|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 188 responses total. |
oval
|
|
response 50 of 188:
| 
Mar 28 21:33 UTC 2002 |
kids need to be educated about their sexuality and comfortable enough with
it so that if some freak trys to fondle them they know what that is and that
its wrong. i don't care if pedophiles get their jollies off on a book like
that if the book is something that will help kids know what's going on.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 51 of 188:
|
Mar 28 22:13 UTC 2002 |
I think the more that kids are educated about their bodies and their
functions, the less they will have smarmy attitudes toward sex. They
might not even laugh at "dirty jokes" but rather just consider them
stupid.
|
jazz
|
|
response 52 of 188:
|
Mar 28 22:18 UTC 2002 |
Besides, if we're going to deal with anything that a fetishist could
get off on equally, it's going to get awfully hard to find good shoes.
It's disappointing that we're still grappling with the same issues that
Freud grappled with in the last century.
|
oval
|
|
response 53 of 188:
|
Mar 28 22:31 UTC 2002 |
i blame the christians.
|
jazz
|
|
response 54 of 188:
|
Mar 28 22:32 UTC 2002 |
Italy's very Christian, and they have considerably fewer sexual
hang-ups than America does. I think it's that nasty viral puritan meme that
refuses to die.
|
oval
|
|
response 55 of 188:
|
Mar 28 22:38 UTC 2002 |
yea i just watched something about this whole pedophilia in the catholic
church issue. maybe our sexually repressed society breeds sexually fucked up
individuals, who become priests so they can safely rape little boys.
|
senna
|
|
response 56 of 188:
|
Mar 28 23:18 UTC 2002 |
I really enjoy hearing people tell me that if I'm enlightened, I will agree
with their viewpoints and behavior. Beautiful. :)
|
russ
|
|
response 57 of 188:
|
Mar 29 03:38 UTC 2002 |
Re #55: Or men with urges they find uncomfortable go into the
priesthood where they are supposed to be celebate, and then find
out that urges are still there and the temptations are more than
they ever thought.
|
flem
|
|
response 58 of 188:
|
Mar 29 05:53 UTC 2002 |
And the conformist meme. Don't forget that one, it's at least as bad as the
puritan one.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 59 of 188:
|
Mar 29 08:04 UTC 2002 |
A long term (17 year?) study was released recently (past couple days)
that showed a positive correlation between exposure to 'media' violence
and expression of violence. One might infer that exposure to depictions
of pedarestry might correlate similarly.
Child pornography isn't art by any stretch of the imagination, and it
isn't too much of a stretch of the imagination to conclude that there
is 'art' that normal people would consider art that is quite 'exciting'
to some less normative segments of the population. Its not too hard
to further imagine that some folk might find a catalog for a livestock
auction to be on par with "Victoria's Secret" catalog. There are
apparently sick fucks in Japan who regard Janet Reno as a sex god and
I seem to recall some media mention of one fellow with a fixation on
chainlink fences somewhere out east.
One doesn't need to encompass the entire krafft-ebbing spectrum as
definintion of 'art' to decide that which is not.
|
jazz
|
|
response 60 of 188:
|
Mar 29 13:27 UTC 2002 |
Chainlink fences? Wow.
|
gull
|
|
response 61 of 188:
|
Mar 29 14:32 UTC 2002 |
I've heard about a lot of weird fetishes, but that's a new one on me.
Obviously we need to require all chain link fences to be covered so
sickos like that don't get aroused by seeing them. ;)
|
jazz
|
|
response 62 of 188:
|
Mar 29 14:46 UTC 2002 |
Definitely. More barbed wire.
Wait. What if someone gets off on that?
|
slynne
|
|
response 63 of 188:
|
Mar 29 15:00 UTC 2002 |
Now I understand why I wasnt allowed to put up a chain link fence last
year.
|
oval
|
|
response 64 of 188:
|
Mar 29 18:20 UTC 2002 |
stop it you guys are turning me on.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 65 of 188:
|
Mar 29 18:25 UTC 2002 |
Re #59: the study was not of the effect of TV exposure to violence per-se,
but simply to TV viewing of any kind. The correlation was found between
degree of TV watching and later proclivities to violence.
This may be just a correlation, however, and not cause and effect. If
a demographic likely to be more violent in later life from other
influences (crime in the community, gangs, poverty, etc) also tended
to watch more TV when young, for lack of other diversions, then such
a correlation would be found.
|
slynne
|
|
response 66 of 188:
|
Mar 29 20:33 UTC 2002 |
One time a friend of mine said to me that I had nice proclivities but I
thought he said that I had a nice pair of titties so I gave him a dirty
look.
|
oval
|
|
response 67 of 188:
|
Mar 29 20:41 UTC 2002 |
hey, but it's a compliment either way!
|
slynne
|
|
response 68 of 188:
|
Mar 29 21:24 UTC 2002 |
That is true!
|
other
|
|
response 69 of 188:
|
Mar 29 21:58 UTC 2002 |
<lol> I'll have to remember that one. :)
|
brighn
|
|
response 70 of 188:
|
Mar 29 22:35 UTC 2002 |
#48> "Caligula" was a fairly strong criticism of the excesses of that Roman
Emperor. Since it is chastising such behavior, is it ok? (That's an excuse
many early filmmakers used -- if they made movies about Bible stories like
Sodom, it was okie dokie to get really graphic.)
Beady> "Lolita" is child pornography. It is also art.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 71 of 188:
|
Mar 30 05:42 UTC 2002 |
re#70: Are you refering to the nabokov (creepy guy) novel or the films?
I haven't read or seen any, so I'll take you word that it is porno as
well as art.
|
brighn
|
|
response 72 of 188:
|
Mar 30 05:56 UTC 2002 |
#71> Both, actually. Seen one movie version (the most recent), read the book.
It's hardly "hardcore," but there is "intimate" time between an adult and a
minor.
|
bdh3
|
|
response 73 of 188:
|
Mar 30 06:16 UTC 2002 |
And you see that as a good thing?
|
redcom
|
|
response 74 of 188:
|
Mar 30 07:53 UTC 2002 |
hey if fictional characters are enjoying themselves and each other, that is
a good thing.
|