|
Grex > Agora41 > #112: Why Americans ,in general, are so dumb in geography? | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 360 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 50 of 360:
|
Apr 25 16:11 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 51 of 360:
|
Apr 25 17:10 UTC 2002 |
It's not that clear at all. Some districts do very well.
|
jp2
|
|
response 52 of 360:
|
Apr 25 17:14 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 53 of 360:
|
Apr 25 17:16 UTC 2002 |
Is education in Singapore privatized? I thought most "civilized" countries
had government-sponsored education.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 54 of 360:
|
Apr 25 17:31 UTC 2002 |
did you go to private school K - 12, Jamie Jr?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 55 of 360:
|
Apr 25 17:56 UTC 2002 |
The real problem with comparisons like that is taht in countries like
Singapore and Japan, only the upper segment of the student population goes
to the "standard track" of schools and thus gets counted in those statistics.
We count everyone. In those countries, the slow kids get tracked into
vocational ed early and aren't counted.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 56 of 360:
|
Apr 25 18:16 UTC 2002 |
they fudge the stats.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 57 of 360:
|
Apr 25 18:25 UTC 2002 |
In a sense, yeah. But they really don't have an equivalent stat to give us,
even if they wanted to.
|
polygon
|
|
response 58 of 360:
|
Apr 25 18:31 UTC 2002 |
The human ability continuum is such that chopping off the bottom end is a
sure-fire way to improve your stats. They call it the "Lake Wobegon
Effect": all the school districts are above average.
In Muskegon Heights a few years ago, they embarked on a quiet but intense
campaign to reclassify low-achieving students as "special ed" (and hence
removed from the testing pool). Parents of these students were given
misleading information and pressured to sign waivers. At the next round
of statewide testing, the district achieved a huge bounce, the largest
test-score increase in the state. They celebrated this without mentioning
the hundreds of students who had been reclassified. Just plain
dishonesty.
Critics who point with alarm at the decline in SAT scores over the past
forty years don't seem to be interested in the fact that the percentage of
students who take the SAT is vastly larger now than it was a generation or
two ago. More dishonesty.
|
brighn
|
|
response 59 of 360:
|
Apr 25 18:38 UTC 2002 |
Exactly. Does anybody have stats on the percent of people who graduated high
school 10, 20, 50 years ago? Or the percent of people who graduated college?
And my question still stands. Jamie's thesis is that government-sponsored
education guarantees poor output. His evidence is a comparison of the United
States to other countries which also, to my knowledge, have
government-sponsored education.
|
gull
|
|
response 60 of 360:
|
Apr 25 20:39 UTC 2002 |
Charter schools in Michigan recently proved that relaxing the government
regulations doesn't necessarily improve test scores. The charter
schools, on average, scored poorer on the MEAP than traditional public
schools.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 61 of 360:
|
Apr 25 21:32 UTC 2002 |
Possibly -- I don't know, I'm guessing -- because unlike the traditional
public schools, they don't devote huge amounts of effort to teaching to the
MEAP.
|
janc
|
|
response 62 of 360:
|
Apr 26 01:31 UTC 2002 |
I remember visiting Germany as a kid. When we arrived at my
Grandmother's house, we found the neighbor kid peering eagerly from the
bushes. They had heard that some American children where coming to
visit my grandmother, and were eager to see real live black people.
At first I thought they'd been over-exposed to news reports about the
civil rights movement and had some how decided that all Americans were
black. But I soon learned that it was much simpler than that. The
German words for "America" and "Africa" sound as much alike as the
English words do, and they had simply gotten America and Africa mixed
up.
To an American, this seems quite an incomprehensible gaff. I'd never
met anyone before who'd made *that* mistake, but I'm sure it's pretty
common among school children world wide. So it's easy to see fault in
the geographic knowledge of people from other countries, especially
with respect to your own country. I'm sure folks in India are a lot
more likely to know where Bombay is than Americans are, but are they
more likely to be able to identify Pacific Islands?
But there are other factors too. The rest of the world matters less to
Americans than it does to folks in other countries. Actions by the
governments of Spain, Botswana, and Thailand are unlikely to effect any
particular American. At most they might start a war that some
Americans get sent to, while most Americans stay home and watch TV as
usual. Being a superpower confers a degree of complancy. Even the
9/11 thing, didn't really change the lives of many Americans.
Also, if you are a member of one of the wealthier, more educated
families in India, you are very likely to have some relatives who have
lived in America, or even moved there. The odds that an American has
any relatives who have lived or moved to India is much lower (mostly
only happens if they are of Indian descent). So this too makes America
more interesting to Indians than India is to Americans.
|
avin
|
|
response 63 of 360:
|
Apr 26 02:29 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 64 of 360:
|
Apr 27 01:16 UTC 2002 |
re: "the percentage of students who take the SAT is vastly larger now than
it was a generation or two ago." And the scoring has gotten easier.
|
polygon
|
|
response 65 of 360:
|
Apr 27 02:19 UTC 2002 |
Re 64. Maybe that's why we have seen a gentle decline rather than a
precipitous drop.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 66 of 360:
|
Apr 27 05:07 UTC 2002 |
A few years back, a Virginia (I think it was) school district was so upset
by their poor performance on a standardised test that they . . . changed
tests.
On the poor MEAP performance of the charter schools: I wonder how much of
that is because the kids in those schools were doing badly before they got
to the charter school? That is, they were failing, their parents knew they
were failing, so they were moved to a new school.
I'm not sure how close to the MEAP the public schools are teaching.
Some are closer than others, no doubt. However, now that the legislature
seems to be getting serious about tying dollars to MEAP performance,
it's like that everyone will be teaching very close to the test.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 67 of 360:
|
Apr 27 05:12 UTC 2002 |
WHich is a damn shame, really.
|
senna
|
|
response 68 of 360:
|
Apr 27 05:27 UTC 2002 |
Yep. There are a lot of things a school needs to do, but the MEAP encompasses
almost none of those. The bottom third still gets screwed, the kids are still
poorly adjusted, allt hose controversial moral issues are still controversial.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 69 of 360:
|
Apr 27 13:40 UTC 2002 |
re67: absolutely.
|
avin
|
|
response 70 of 360:
|
Apr 27 14:30 UTC 2002 |
Hey..all school kids here! no grads ? sorry to bother u guys ..it was only
a little more geography was what I asked for and see what I got!!
|
sarkhel
|
|
response 71 of 360:
|
Apr 27 16:32 UTC 2002 |
Avin u have to bear with it, its US, like to distract from the main issue and
make world a fools paradise :-(
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 72 of 360:
|
Apr 27 16:40 UTC 2002 |
Hey, this is a BBS. Going off-topic is what BBSes are for.
I suspect my knowledge of world geography is stronger than either of yours,
but there's no real way to test that since we've all got web access.
|
jp2
|
|
response 73 of 360:
|
Apr 27 17:00 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
md
|
|
response 74 of 360:
|
Apr 27 19:16 UTC 2002 |
[as Jamie misses one bus but boards another] Which item was that?
|