You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-59        
 
Author Message
10 new of 59 responses total.
tsty
response 50 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 10 08:46 UTC 1996

dunno the solution to 47/49. happens far too often. quandry for
me too. i'd love to find a solution.
mdw
response 51 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 11:19 UTC 1996

Shill.
tsty
response 52 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 08:05 UTC 1996

as in pr?
mta
response 53 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 13 15:40 UTC 1996

No, a shill is a person planted in the audience intended to respond as 
the organizer hopes to inspire others to react.  

For instance a snake oil salesman might plant a shill to rush up and buy 
3 bottles, proclaiming loudly that 'it saved my Tilly's life, gave 
granpaw back his own teeth, and worked great to keep my hat on in a high 
wind, too."  The idea being that other members of the audience, seeing a 
rush to buy, would join him.

In this case, I think Marcus is suggesting having someone come in and 
start making the "stick the neck out" posts and responses that Rane was 
hoping to see, giving Rane the opportunity to visibly reward this sort 
of use of the cf.

(Did I get that right, Marcus?)
mdw
response 54 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 01:12 UTC 1996

(Yup.)
ryan1
response 55 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 21:59 UTC 1996

Woah!  I *never* thought I'd see what I just saw!
A *one* (count it-- 1) word response by marcus :)
heh 
ladyevil
response 56 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 01:09 UTC 1996

Yeah, but for one word, he managed three punctuation marks..
davel
response 57 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 13:14 UTC 1996

But his *previous* response was also one word, and only one punctuation mark.
(But the word had 5 letters - this one only had 3.  And he got someone else
to explain the first one at greater length.)
tsty
response 58 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 13:22 UTC 1996

agreed that planting a shill works great in a random assembly of people.
  
might even be worth a try in a closed group of ppl who see each other
a coupletimes a week and who might be able to identify the foreigner.
  
however, it is worth a try in that context. something has towork.
mta
response 59 of 59: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 00:18 UTC 1996

<laugh>  I guesss I'm still pretty well trained even after all this time. 
;)
 0-24   25-49   50-59        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss