|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 14 new of 63 responses total. |
cmcgee
|
|
response 50 of 63:
| 
Jul 16 01:49 UTC 2007 |
Ok, thanks cyklone. I doubt that is who it is then.
|
krokus
|
|
response 51 of 63:
|
Jul 16 05:53 UTC 2007 |
I agree with cyclone, while she would find it highly humorous.
|
unicorn
|
|
response 52 of 63:
|
Jul 16 06:47 UTC 2007 |
#29: "It doesn't seem that he's actually reading anything, so we might
be under his radar."
Check this out:
unicorn@grex.cyberspace.org:~% ls -al ~pins | grep coop
-rw-r--r-- 1 pins newpeople 459 Jul 14 22:37 .coop14.cf
It appears he read this very conference late Saturday night. If John
is correct, and this is a well-known user, he may have read it since
that time under his other login. I'm quite certain he's watching our
response, though. It may be that certain aspects of our solution may
need to be discussed privately (private e-mail among staff, or even
in-person communications among those of you in Ann Arbor). Technical
solutions, in particular, may be more difficult to circumvent if he
doesn't know how he's being blocked.
|
jep
|
|
response 53 of 63:
|
Jul 19 22:49 UTC 2007 |
re my comments in resp:11: It seemed it took cross a really long time to
get onto the staff, despite his evident Unix skills and willingness to
contribute a great deal of effort. I don't think it took so long for
some current and past staffers who are personally better known to mdw
and steve.
It seems the reluctance to add new staffers was done in the name of
security. It was my intention to assert that this did not make Grex
more secure, but that it instead made Grex less secure.
It was not my intention to personally attack anyone. I am a huge
admirer of the abilities and efforts of a lot of the staff, specifically
including mdw and steve.
The Board appears to be moving quickly to accept unicorn into the staff.
I find this remarkable. The Board isn't waiting for staff approval
before adding a new staff member. I am not sure that's ever been done
before. I guess we will all see whether it works out. I am in favor of
giving it a try, myself. Grex seems to be in much more danger from
staff inactivity than from possibly bringing in an evil staff member.
|
jadecat
|
|
response 54 of 63:
|
Jul 20 13:14 UTC 2007 |
I really have to agree with the very last sentence in that last paragraph.
|
remmers
|
|
response 55 of 63:
|
Jul 20 13:27 UTC 2007 |
Correction to #53, first paragraph: It didn't take long for cross to
get on staff the *first* time. After he resigned in a huff and left
questions about his suitability as a team player, it took a while for
him to get onto staff the *second* time.
|
jep
|
|
response 56 of 63:
|
Jul 20 13:35 UTC 2007 |
I thought it took a while for him to get taken seriously when he first
volunteered. Maybe my perception is wrong. If so, I apologize for my
error.
I understood why it took him a while to be accepted back onto the staff
after resigning.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 57 of 63:
|
Jul 21 19:25 UTC 2007 |
Would rebooting open up the telnet ports?
|
unicorn
|
|
response 58 of 63:
|
Jul 21 22:47 UTC 2007 |
Grex was rebooted shortly after noon today, and it hasn't helped.
|
naftee
|
|
response 59 of 63:
|
Aug 6 01:29 UTC 2007 |
neither has shaving your scrotum
|
lar
|
|
response 60 of 63:
|
Nov 28 21:16 UTC 2007 |
You guys never figured out that spin,pins,nips ect. was cdalten
aka"jan"?
|
unicorn
|
|
response 61 of 63:
|
Nov 28 22:49 UTC 2007 |
But it wasn't. Go to the oldagora conference (aka agora62), and look
at item #4, response #215 for the proof. You can also backtrack to the
previous responses if you want to see more of the discussion. The real
culprit has been behaving himself since then, as far as I've been able
to tell, but Chad has taken up where he left off with a vengeance.
|
naftee
|
|
response 62 of 63:
|
Dec 6 17:11 UTC 2007 |
hi lar
|
lar
|
|
response 63 of 63:
|
Dec 6 21:19 UTC 2007 |
it was polytarp! soup's right hand!
|
