|
Grex > Coop > #279: Minutes from 6/13/10 Board Meeting | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 20 new of 69 responses total. |
tsty
|
|
response 50 of 69:
| 
Jul 8 07:18 UTC 2010 |
kewl .. carrying stuff w/me at all tmes
|
richard
|
|
response 51 of 69:
|
Jul 8 16:33 UTC 2010 |
why does janc need to sign? as far as I know, he has left grex and
hasn't used it in quite some time. he probably would not want to sign.
|
tsty
|
|
response 52 of 69:
|
Jul 9 00:30 UTC 2010 |
becasue the balnk says hse does.
|
lar
|
|
response 53 of 69:
|
Jul 9 00:42 UTC 2010 |
what's a balnk? your imaginary friend?
|
kentn
|
|
response 54 of 69:
|
Jul 9 01:43 UTC 2010 |
The bank is not grex, so janc can leave grex, but that does not
necessarily cancel any bank account-related access.
|
lar
|
|
response 55 of 69:
|
Jul 9 09:13 UTC 2010 |
him and popcorn have been waiting for 7 or 8 years for you lamers to
figure it out.
|
tsty
|
|
response 56 of 69:
|
Jul 10 04:54 UTC 2010 |
daer lur:
it was fingerd ourt loooong ago, by us. it jsut took you 7-8 yrs to figure
it out. we knew all along, of course.
|
lar
|
|
response 57 of 69:
|
Jul 10 16:03 UTC 2010 |
OH RLY? you slugworm clusterfucks
|
richard
|
|
response 58 of 69:
|
Jul 14 21:30 UTC 2010 |
What if Jan is unavailable/missing/lost at sea/deceased/abducted by
aliens or whatever? There has to be a mechanism by which the bank can
be informed that it is simply no longer possible to obtain his
signature and that things must proceed without it.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 59 of 69:
|
Jul 14 21:59 UTC 2010 |
Just add a new signature to the account.
|
cross
|
|
response 60 of 69:
|
Jul 15 16:18 UTC 2010 |
Regarding the Grex SSL certificate: Mark is right. It's something that
I paid for out of pocket (because I got tired of seeing warnings from
web- browsers about expired, self-signed certs). I used my personal
GoDaddy account to do it which, somewhat ironically, I can't really
access from Afghanistan. I think the best course of action would be
for someone who's got some real access to go ahead and buy a new one.
If I get an email from GoDaddy, I can try and explain the situation to
them.
|
kentn
|
|
response 61 of 69:
|
Jul 15 17:25 UTC 2010 |
Thanks, Dan. We should pay you for your expenses on Grex's behalf IMO
(if the Board agrees). The Board already approved money for Tony to set
up a new godaddy account and generate new certs, so hopefully we're okay
that way. Thanks for doing this for use previously.
|
cross
|
|
response 62 of 69:
|
Jul 16 15:06 UTC 2010 |
Hey, no problem.... No need to be reimbursed, either. It benefited me
as much a anyone else.
|
tsty
|
|
response 63 of 69:
|
Jul 20 04:52 UTC 2010 |
reimburse .. not even a qauestoin.
|
tsty
|
|
response 64 of 69:
|
Aug 2 04:29 UTC 2010 |
PayPal balance: $286.95 USD
|
tsty
|
|
response 65 of 69:
|
Aug 2 04:59 UTC 2010 |
of which $280.00 has now been trnsferred to the checking acct ...
|
kentn
|
|
response 66 of 69:
|
Aug 2 12:05 UTC 2010 |
Thanks, TS! Have you noted who paid for memberships so that they can be
notified?
|
tsty
|
|
response 67 of 69:
|
Aug 3 04:25 UTC 2010 |
that will come next time i go to papal ... their softwarz for tha twere out
of commission at the itme.
|
tsty
|
|
response 68 of 69:
|
Aug 31 06:48 UTC 2010 |
got the rundown... ur good.
|
tsty
|
|
response 69 of 69:
|
Sep 2 07:34 UTC 2010 |
got an idea .. baracuda newtworks did an aacs shoe tinight.
interseting, actally,.
it was mostl a sales pitch (which we trashed, apporpoptriately) but there is
a tech buy who will do a show in a cojuple moths.
much more to our code-scriblesrs;s liking.
anyways, grx -cpould- ofer web ased emal with a baracudda front end for spam
control ... selected by the loginid ... not blankest mandatory.
teh ... @cyberspace.orfg addrs has sastonishing resonance.
we are original ... we are pioneers.
ik odn;t knw what gui/html/wab emaikl process wold/could run here but as teh
net advances, wome ow grex meeds o fo d a wau to stayu/imporove currncy with
standard toech (of the moent).
tyoing sucks ... read through it. tnx.
|