|
Grex > Coop > #239: We need to have a BoD meeting! | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 46 responses total. |
cross
|
|
response 5 of 46:
| 
Aug 25 19:49 UTC 2008 |
Ain't no thang.
|
denise
|
|
response 6 of 46:
|
Sep 1 00:55 UTC 2008 |
Yeah, I noticed, too, that not too many people responded to the email...
I don't remember how many people are on the board; can we at least get
some kind of quorum together and get down to business?
Until I know when I'll be discharged from my partial hospitalization
trreeatment program, I can't guarantee being to a meeting on time on a
weeknight, as sometimes I don't finish up til 7-8:00. I hope that I'll
be finished sometime in the next week or two but I don't know for sure.
Usually I have the weekend off from the program [except I had to go in
for the day yesterday], so if we do something in the next couple weeks,
maybe a weekend date would be best for me.
|
denise
|
|
response 7 of 46:
|
Sep 1 00:56 UTC 2008 |
What can we do to make the meeting more fun so people would want to
attend? Maybe a potluck or something?
|
nhardon
|
|
response 8 of 46:
|
Sep 2 12:45 UTC 2008 |
A potluck wouldn't be such a great idea because some people are so poor
that they might actually start stealing the food. Ya know, not all of
us can qualify for mensa only to end up asking other people to pay for
their grex membership!
|
denise
|
|
response 9 of 46:
|
Sep 5 22:13 UTC 2008 |
So who's going to pick a date, time, and place, and just get on with
this? I know I've asked about it multiple times in various
items/conferences and to specific people.
It's not like there's absolutely NO interest in keeping this board and
system going. This is my first time on the board thus, am asking for
whatever protocal is needed. Or not needed.
|
cross
|
|
response 10 of 46:
|
Sep 6 02:31 UTC 2008 |
I vote for Sept. 9th, at 7pm Eastern.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 11 of 46:
|
Sep 7 01:25 UTC 2008 |
Is that when Chuck Martin goes to hell with his whore mother?
|
naftee
|
|
response 12 of 46:
|
Sep 7 03:53 UTC 2008 |
chuck is getting chucked out.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 13 of 46:
|
Sep 7 13:49 UTC 2008 |
I hope so. I mean hell, if grex wanted a dumbass to help with the daily
operations, then they should have put nharmon on staff.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 14 of 46:
|
Sep 7 14:57 UTC 2008 |
I would probably spend more time dealing with system problems. Yes, that
means you.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 15 of 46:
|
Sep 7 15:20 UTC 2008 |
This response has been erased.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 16 of 46:
|
Sep 7 15:22 UTC 2008 |
This response has been erased.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 17 of 46:
|
Sep 7 15:23 UTC 2008 |
What good would that do if I post the blueprints to the attack on m-net?
Remember, unitard tried this approach and failed miserably. Geeze, once again,
you failed to learn something. What a shocker. I mean, hell, I wouldn't
guessed it from some 10 year perl veteran that codes on the following level
#12 Nathan Harmon [nharmon] (11) (Mon, May 26, 2008 (15:55)):
nathan@pythagoras ~/temp > cat > stupid.pl
my $worldpac = "5"."0";
my $butt = 5;
print "It treated them as ";
print $butt == $worldpac ? "the same." : "different.";
print "\n";
^C
nathan@pythagoras ~/temp > perl ./stupid.pl
It treated them as different.
nathan@pythagoras ~/temp >
|
gelinas
|
|
response 18 of 46:
|
Sep 8 17:32 UTC 2008 |
So the Board will meet at 7:00pm tomorrow (Sep 9) evening? Where?
I have two suggestions for the agenda: an election of officers, and
scheduling a special election to replace Jan.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 19 of 46:
|
Sep 8 21:33 UTC 2008 |
We also need a special election to replace that worthless piece of shit
that calls himself unicorn.
|
cross
|
|
response 20 of 46:
|
Sep 8 21:48 UTC 2008 |
resp:18 I don't know about everyone else, but I'll be in my apartment....
He he he. :-)
Btw: Could someone please send me the phone number of wherever we are meeting?
|
aruba
|
|
response 21 of 46:
|
Sep 9 17:25 UTC 2008 |
OK, we're going to try to meet tonight at 6:30, at 32 55 Cardinal Drive.
Sorry for the short notice. Hopefully this will be a preliminary meeting to
set up a regular schedule again.
|
remmers
|
|
response 22 of 46:
|
Sep 9 17:35 UTC 2008 |
Excellent! I hope y'all get back on track with regular meetings.
|
cdalten
|
|
response 23 of 46:
|
Sep 10 01:26 UTC 2008 |
Shut it aruba.
|
tsty
|
|
response 24 of 46:
|
Sep 10 20:03 UTC 2008 |
yeh, kinda was short notice hoever if this meeting does no business
*except* set a a future dae for a complete meeting then it's
not a problem, imo.
|
cross
|
|
response 25 of 46:
|
Sep 10 21:48 UTC 2008 |
We did have a meeting last night, and in my opinion, it was quite productive.
Sure, we didn't follow the correct protocol for it (in terms of laying out
the agenda before hand, etc) but in getting back on track, you've got to start
somewhere, and we did do that.
|
jep
|
|
response 26 of 46:
|
Sep 11 17:09 UTC 2008 |
I'm glad the Board met. I look forward to seeing what it did but am
sure some good things happened. I would have liked for it to have
touched all the bases and made sure it followed all of the right
procedures, but if the first two things happened, I'll take that.
Thanks for pulling things together.
|
cross
|
|
response 27 of 46:
|
Sep 11 20:57 UTC 2008 |
No problem, but it wasn't just me. The board mostly followed the
"standard" procedures, but the tone was, to an extent, "Hey, we
haven't talked in a year, what do we need to actually talk about?
What are the issues?" Etc. To that end, a large part of the tenor
was about how we should go about getting back on track.
A tentative date for the next board meeting was set, on October 9
(or was it 7? Either way, that's the general time frame). It is
tentative to some extent, because of my schedule, and whether I'll
be around on that day, or in the treeline doing some more field
training.
|
remmers
|
|
response 28 of 46:
|
Sep 12 10:37 UTC 2008 |
I'm glad that the board got together too. Were officers selected?
|
cross
|
|
response 29 of 46:
|
Sep 12 10:56 UTC 2008 |
Yes. Steve is the president, Mark the treasurer, and either Mark or Denise
the secretary (it was a bit hard to hear on that one).
|