|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 115 responses total. |
morwen
|
|
response 5 of 115:
|
Mar 5 01:37 UTC 2002 |
resp:2 I agree, this item should REALLy be retitled to reflect the
contents. IE This item is for adults only.
|
jazz
|
|
response 6 of 115:
|
Mar 5 02:25 UTC 2002 |
As might any item, potentially, on GREX.
Some people forget that children might read items; others don't care,
and don't let considerations for potential audiences stifle good
conversations.
|
phenix
|
|
response 7 of 115:
|
Mar 5 03:24 UTC 2002 |
what he said
|
brighn
|
|
response 8 of 115:
|
Mar 5 04:26 UTC 2002 |
Which of the rules is being broken? The title describes the items, we're to
believe the posts are true (I have no way of knowing), and there's no rule
in the entry screen about saying adult items must be so marked.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 9 of 115:
|
Mar 5 13:39 UTC 2002 |
This is the SEX conference. I think it's obvious that any item, at any time,
could contain adult content just from the conference title.
|
phenix
|
|
response 10 of 115:
|
Mar 5 17:53 UTC 2002 |
works for me
wow
|
morwen
|
|
response 11 of 115:
|
Mar 6 00:29 UTC 2002 |
<shrug> okay. I give. But I still think that the word "Pornographic"
should be included in the title of this. Then again, I feel the same
way about the three or four things that Jamie posted over in Agora. :P
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 12 of 115:
|
Mar 6 01:27 UTC 2002 |
Is that for aesthetic reasons (you want to skip poorly written Net Porn)
or moral reasons?
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 13 of 115:
|
Mar 6 04:41 UTC 2002 |
Me, I'd say a little of both. It would be nice to have a little
warning in either case.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 14 of 115:
|
Mar 6 06:42 UTC 2002 |
Um...
Item 21: hotel exhibitionism
Entered by jack ulation (cum) on Sat, Mar 2, 2002 (14:38):
This isn't rocket science, really.
|
jazz
|
|
response 15 of 115:
|
Mar 6 06:42 UTC 2002 |
I kinda wonder what the poster (or posters, if they are indeed
seperate entities) wanted to see out of the forum they were posting this in;
any reasonable exhibitionist who liked to tell stories would know that just
posting stories doesn't make it very likely they'll be believed.
|
hoe
|
|
response 16 of 115:
|
Mar 6 07:45 UTC 2002 |
Hi ! My name is Christy Anne and I'm an eighteen
year old sex worker. I really want to say how happy I
am that somebody has finally gotten around to
telling about some sexual experiences instead of the
constant bickering and moralizing that has been the
typical fare for discussion in this sexuality
conference.
I want to tell about visits I have with a regular client
here where I live most of the year. Mike is a thirty
year old father of two with a prudish and churchy
wife; that comes to me to consistently recharge his
batteries, if you know what I mean?
First, my figure can be described as 36C-25-38 and
you should know that I have a number of body
piercings. I have bar studs in both of my perky
nipples and 3 captivating rings that close my pussy
lips most of the time. Normally, I remove my body
jewelry before seeing clients; Mike is so attentive
that he discovered the holes from the piercings and
demanded to see my jewelry installed. I also have
toe rings that I sometimes wear on the middle toes
of both my left and right feet.
Mike likes to see me in a motel that has a balcony
walkway past each of the rooms. and the rooms all
have large picture windows that allow full view into
the bed area especially after dark. Mike likes me to
wear white thigh-high stockings and when I arrive he
has me remove everything except the stockings. I
start each session by putting on his long-sleeve
white shirt which I am never allowed to button. We
always open the room's drapes as fully as possible
'cause he is excited by exhibiting our adult play to
whoever walks by and cares to view what's happening.
Mike begins by removing first my nipple studs and
then my pussy rings. He exercises extreme care to
have me recline on the bed with my open thighs
toward the big window. Next he massages my chest,
waist, hips and cunt with a special lotion he supplies
that is somewhat like a lotion and somewhat like an
oil if you can imagine that being spread on my
smooth, tanned skin. Next he lathers my entire pubic
area and shaves me HAIRLESS taking perfect care
not to block the WINDOW'S view of the entire process.
After my labia have been smoothed he slowly
removes those white stockings and plays with my
toe-rings; occasionally he gives me a pedicure or
paints my toe-nails. All this attention that Mike is
focusing upon me is causing a full head of 'steam' to
build up in him. He always blows his first copious
load externally on my pussy and massages his juice
into my skin just like a lotion. While he massages his
cum into my cunt I like to have him lie end to end
and give him a little head.
When enters me, he like to have me on my hands
and knees on the bed and sideways to the window
while he is standing. Occasionally, he'll bind my
wrists and ankles with leather straps for our fuck
sessions. He particularly likes to massage my ass
while his reinflated cock impales my pussy.
Mike tells me he wants to knock me up 'cause he'd
like to massage my big belly too. Since I see Mike
regularly, I never have to groom my pussy for
myself. He also tells me he wants to have me tattoed
with a special icon that he won't describe to me; I
know where he got that idea 'cause he had me watch
that film called the Story of 'O'. What do You think?
Want to have me come visit you?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 17 of 115:
|
Mar 6 15:27 UTC 2002 |
Re #15: Especially since these look like they've just been copied off Usenet
or something.
|
jazz
|
|
response 18 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:33 UTC 2002 |
All I ever read well enough to recognize was Kateri's stuff, and this
ain't it.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 19 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:46 UTC 2002 |
They just look like that kind of generic story.
|
jazz
|
|
response 20 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:58 UTC 2002 |
True; it definitely doesn't sound like real reports from the field.
|
brighn
|
|
response 21 of 115:
|
Mar 6 16:59 UTC 2002 |
#16 has a personalized paragraph at the beginning, FWIW. OTOH, I think it's
offensive to come in here and say, "Oh, the new people are SO wonderful
because they're posting things *I* want to read, and you people who have been
here for YEARS and who are talking about things you want to talk about? YOU
SUCK! How dare you talk about things YOU enjoy in YOUR conf?"
|
jazz
|
|
response 22 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:36 UTC 2002 |
Well, it's not all that strange when you consider they're all the same
person. You don't need to do the actual legwork on this one, either -
they've all got unusual online habits and characteristic phrasing, which
suggests that it's not even three people who know each other, but one person.
|
phenix
|
|
response 23 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:37 UTC 2002 |
ok. what exactly is the problem here?
your local fw has lost track of what the argument's over.
also, if i DO find that these stories are plagerized i WILL freeze
this item, notify the original authors and give them the posters
ip.
i will also post something to this effect in the item so that it's not some
random freeze thing.
|
jazz
|
|
response 24 of 115:
|
Mar 6 17:38 UTC 2002 |
This is a situation that calls for good old-fashioned skepticism and
gentle guiding into active participation, not a bazooka ... :)
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 25 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:48 UTC 2002 |
No kidding. Or just good old-fashioned ignoring of posts you aren't
interested in.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 26 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:49 UTC 2002 |
And hang on a minute -- why would you want to freeze the item if #0 is
"plagiarized"?
That wouldn't stop people from reading the "plagiarized" text, it would
just stop us from talking about it, which is pointless and silly. LIke
trying to require posts in the sex.cf that include sex stories to bear the
label "pornography -- warning, evil".
|
brighn
|
|
response 27 of 115:
|
Mar 6 18:57 UTC 2002 |
I'm seeing Greg act in an unusual way in this item. Are you having a bad week,
Greg? I mean, sure, this is a weird item, and worth hostility, but not THIS
much hostility.
|
phenix
|
|
response 28 of 115:
|
Mar 6 19:57 UTC 2002 |
plagarism pisses me off, if I have proff of it, and i could, i'd wipe the posts
but grex does not allow me to do that. i accept that.
*IF* i recieve proof of plagarism, the item will be frozen, and people
are more than welcome to start a new item talking about the issue.
and #0 is not what's at issue, it's the varying unoriginal trite stories
in this item.
(note unoriginal not in the sense of someone else's work, just unoriginal
as in totally dirivitive net pr0n)
and how is this unusual/hostile?
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 29 of 115:
|
Mar 6 21:09 UTC 2002 |
I dunno if it's unusual, but denying us the ability to comment on the boring
stories won't stop the guy from posting them, now will it?
|