You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   24-48   49-54        
 
Author Message
6 new of 54 responses total.
mcnally
response 49 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 20:25 UTC 2003

  I understand that you could do that but if the whole vote relies on
  voter-held information for verification purposes, then a suborned voter
  could essentially withdraw their ballot by claiming it invalid.  In a 
  close election, that could be enough to throw the race to the other side.
  And if the information supplied to the voter isn't necessary to validate
  her ballot, then what's it for?
jp2
response 50 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 20:46 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mcnally
response 51 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:05 UTC 2003

  If the presumption is that the counted ballot is valid unless
  the voter can prove otherwise, how does that differ from the
  current system?
jp2
response 52 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:27 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 53 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:36 UTC 2003

Are these paper ballots or just electronic ballots?  If the latter, how is
a voter to know that the counting of her ballot _should_ be challenged?
jp2
response 54 of 54: Mark Unseen   Dec 19 23:46 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

 0-24   24-48   49-54        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss