You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   23-47   48-72   73-95       
 
Author Message
25 new of 95 responses total.
jgelinas
response 48 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 21:48 UTC 2010

RSN.  
denise
response 49 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 14:28 UTC 2010

We need to hold the elections soon, so we should close the nominations 
within the next few days. Say by 1/15th. There are 4 positions
available.  Four people have accepted nominations thus far [unicorn,
STeve, kentn, and  denise] and two have nominated themselves [scholar
and lar].  There are a  number of people that have been nominated but
have not accepted or  declined; if you're one of these people and would
like to run, please  accept by 1/11. 
denise
response 50 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 14:48 UTC 2010

Oops, that should read 'please accept by 1/15'.
tsty
response 51 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 14:56 UTC 2010

  
will remmers be teh vote-admin? 
  
denise
response 52 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 15:54 UTC 2010

I'm assuming so as we agreed to have him be vote administrator before
Grex  was down for so long.
remmers
response 53 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 16:11 UTC 2010

Yes, I'll do it.  Someone will have to tell me who the candidates are,
when the voting should start, and what votes should be counted.  (I
think there was some agreement at the last Board meeting to deviate
from the usual rules.)  Also, a rootish person will need to grant me
some relevant permissions permissions in order to update the necessary
files.  It's been a few years since I've done voteadm stuff, so my
memory is a tiny bit rusty as to exactly what permissions are needed.
(I know, I know, I wrote the voting software, but still...)
tsty
response 54 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 15:01 UTC 2010

  
aruba did say sumothing about it being relatibely easy to generate
an   'are you now or have you ever been'  membership list.
  
iirc, those ppl are the voters pool.
  
remmers
response 55 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 15:29 UTC 2010

Yes, I believe that's correct.
denise
response 56 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 22:46 UTC 2010

For this election, those that are or have ever been a member will be 
eligible to vote.
tonster
response 57 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 02:57 UTC 2010

Counts me out!
jgelinas
response 58 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 12:47 UTC 2010

Monthly dues are six dollars ($6.00), payable by the end of the
election.

Usually, a three-month investment, eighteen dollars ($18.00) is required
to vote, but that requirement has been waived.
jep
response 59 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 20:11 UTC 2010

I was a member probably 7 or 8 years ago.  I can vote?  Well, if so, I'll 
take my vote seriously and try to vote for the best candidates.
denise
response 60 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 23:01 UTC 2010

Yep, you're able to vote in this election.
tsty
response 61 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 15 06:34 UTC 2010

  
welcome jep
  
jep
response 62 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 15 19:34 UTC 2010

Heh, I'll be raking all the candidates over the coals to find out their 
positions on the important issues of the day.
tsty
response 63 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 20:21 UTC 2010

  
you got -that- mcuch coal at the end of last month?   [ed: oh, MY!]
  
jp2
response 64 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 13:47 UTC 2010

49:  I sself-nominated and accepted back in 42.
denise
response 65 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 17 22:23 UTC 2010

Yep, jp2 should be added to the list of people that have nominated 
themselves and accepted. Scholar and lar also nominated themselves. 
Unicorn, STeve, kentn and denise have accepted nominations.

It looks like we can start voting whenever remmers is able to set things
 up for us.  I don't recall for sure how long voting is usually open
for,  though.
tsty
response 66 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 05:17 UTC 2010

  
14 days?  iirc
remmers
response 67 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 14:36 UTC 2010

Okay, I'll get on this.  Before I can proceed, I need some
permissions so that I can edit relevant files, and it'll take
someone with root access (which I don't currently have) to give
them to me.  I'll email staff and see if I can get that moving.

So should I take it from resp:65 that the final list of candidates
is unicorn, steve, kentn, denise, jp2, scholar, and lar?

Yes, I believe polls are open for 14 days.
denise
response 68 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 18 20:49 UTC 2010

I got the list in resp:65 from skimming through this item. I'm not sure 
how serious scholar and lar are about running, though they did nominate 
themselves. jp2 is self-nominated but did also accept the nomination in 
the same response, iirc.
remmers
response 69 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 13:05 UTC 2010

If I recall correctly, the policy adopted at the last board meeting
was that anyone who's been a member in the past and who accepted
prior to closing of nominations was eligible to run for the board
this time.  Please correct me if I'm wrong.  In any event, I'll
email aruba and ask him which of the folks on the list meet the
past-member criterion.

I emailed Grex staff (at grex-staff@googlegroups.com, which I
believe is the current address) a couple of days ago requesting
that someone with root privileges give me the necessary access
so that I can configure the vote program for the current election.
No response so far.  

A couple of roots seem to be reading Coop, so I'll repeat the
request here:  I need write access to the directory /var/spool/vote,
and be added to group 'motd' so that I can post election
announcements.
tonster
response 70 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 14:31 UTC 2010

I'd help out, but I've gotten a similar response from staff since
volunteering.
remmers
response 71 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 14:48 UTC 2010

Hm, somebody appears to have added me to group 'motd'.  Don't know
who, but thanks for that.  Still can't seem to access the vote
directory though.  Once that's fixed and I get a response from the
treasurer on who's eligible to run, the election can move forward.
remmers
response 72 of 95: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 16:33 UTC 2010

After reading my own documentation and refreshing my memory
as to how things are supposed to work, the directory /var/spool/vote
should actually be owned by voteadm:vote instead of board:vote as
it is now.  Don't know why it was changed.  So maybe the thing that
a root should do when they get to it is change ownership and then
give me the ability to su to voteadm (via sudo configuration, I
presume).

(Documentation for installing and configuring the vote program is
in the file ~remmers/grexdoc/vote/doc/INSTALL.)
 0-24   23-47   48-72   73-95       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss