You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
 
Author Message
25 new of 610 responses total.
gelinas
response 479 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 6 05:13 UTC 1999

Oof.

Serving size: 1 0unce ; fourteen servings per container
110 calories, 5 from fat
Total Fat: 1g, saturated fat 0g
Cholesterol: 0mg 
Sodium: 200mg
Total Carbohydrate: 24g
Dietary fiber: 2g
Sugars: 0g
Protein: 3g
Vitamin A:  0%        Vitamin C: 0%
Calcium:    4%        Iron:      2%

happyboy
response 480 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 03:08 UTC 1999

putayter chips?
gelinas
response 481 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 05:16 UTC 1999

No, but probably close enough.  Differentiating between potatoes and corn
after they've been through that particular process is done only by taste.

So you're up.  :)
happyboy
response 482 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 8 23:02 UTC 1999

okie doke:

tomato puree (water, toamto paste), water,
cooked enriched macaroni product (flour
enriched with niacin, ferrous sulfate thiamine
mono-nitrate and riboflavin), high fructose corn syrup,
salt, enzyme modified cheddar cheese (cheddar 
cheese [milk, cheese culture, salt, enzyme], water
disodium phosphate), vegetable oil (corn, cottonseed
or partially hydrogenated soybean oil), enzyme modified
butter, oleoresin paprika, spice extract, citric acid
and nonfat dry milk.
i
response 483 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 9 02:29 UTC 1999

SpaghettiOO's (or however it's spelled).
happyboy
response 484 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 10 02:40 UTC 1999

YAY!!!
i
response 485 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 02:54 UTC 1999

(Does #484 mean i actually got it, or ?????)
lilmo
response 486 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 12 23:05 UTC 1999

methinks so.
happyboy
response 487 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 00:33 UTC 1999

yup
lilmo
response 488 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 15 20:02 UTC 1999

Go for it, Doc!
i
response 489 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 16 02:47 UTC 1999

Serving Size:   1 T
Per Container:  about 47
Calories:       20      from fat: 10
Total fat:      1.5g    2%
Saturated:      1g      4%
Cholesterol:    0mg     0%
Sodium          0mg     0%
Total Carbs:    3g      1%
Diet. Fiber:    1g      6%
Sugars: 0g
Protein:        1g
Vitamin A, C, Calcium:   0%
Iron:           4%
keesan
response 490 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 03:00 UTC 1999

Jim guesses Miracle Whip.  (No eggs?)
i
response 491 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 11:03 UTC 1999

I'd think Miracle Whip would have loads more fat and sodium.  In any
case, it's not that.
keesan
response 492 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 14:46 UTC 1999

Miracle Whip Lite, he meant.  But you are right about the sodium.  Half its
calories from fat sounds like a lot to us.  Some kind of unsalted spread?
remmers
response 493 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 15:29 UTC 1999

The numbers in resp:489 don't add up right.
  • 1.5 gm fat = 13.5 calories (not 10 as stated on the label)
  • 3 gm carb = 12.0 calories
  • 1 gm protein = 4.0 calories
for a total of 29.5 calories, not 20.
keesan
response 494 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 18 16:21 UTC 1999

Labels are often wrong.  A 2-pound container of feta cheese says servings are
1 oz and there are 500 servings.  A package of bamboo shoots claims to have
0 g fiber.  The people who make the rules about labels must not read them very
closely, or else only read the fat and cholesterol info, currently in fashion.
i
response 495 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 01:17 UTC 1999

Neither Miracle Whip Lite nor any unsalted spread.

I checked the numbers in #489 against the label - they're "right".  My
guess is that 1.5 g fat means 1.5 +/-.25 g fat, etc. and they don't
count the calories in the fiber.
lilmo
response 496 of 610: Mark Unseen   Oct 19 01:50 UTC 1999

Also, 10 cal means 1O +/- 5 cal.  And I'm pretty sure you're right about the
fiber calories being defined as 0.

Hmmm...  no salt or sugar at all.  It must not be American.  :-)
i
response 497 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 14 19:39 UTC 1999

The mystery food up in #489 isn't incredibly obscure or hard to guess....
BUT YOU GOTTA PLAY TO WIN!
:) 
keesan
response 498 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 21:39 UTC 1999

peanut butter?
lilmo
response 499 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 15 22:24 UTC 1999

only if it's all-natural
i
response 500 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 17 03:33 UTC 1999

1 T of peanut butter has far more grams of 'most everything....especially
fat (though much less of it is saturated).
carson
response 501 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 11:30 UTC 1999

(the serving size suggests something like a condiment or a mix orf
some sort. the lack of sugar is definitely confusing, even though it
*should* help to narrow it down. "half" the calories from fat suggests
... is it cocoa?)
i
response 502 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 18:31 UTC 1999

And the label says........

Ghirardelli Premium Unsweetened Cocoa!

...so carson's up next.
carson
response 503 of 610: Mark Unseen   Nov 27 23:02 UTC 1999

(oh my. I guessed it from looking at a can of Hershey's. cool.) :)

(ok... here's the stuff for my food:)


Nutrition facts

Serving size  1/4 cup (40g)
Servings per container  about 11

Amount per serving

Calories                    130

                 % Daily Value*

Total fat  0g                0%
  Saturated fat 0g           0%
Cholesterol  0mg             0%
Sodium  10mg                 0%
Potassium  310mg             9%
Total carbohydrate  31g     10%
  Dietary fiber  2g          9%
  Sugars  29g
Protein  1g
Calcium  2%           Iron   6%


(the asterix is the standard "based on 2000 calorie diet" disclaimer. the
box also says that the food is "not a significant source of vitamin A and
vitamin C.")

(finally, I'll note that some numbers don't add up exactly. it's a 2.5 cup
container, 425g. hope that helps!)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   400-424   425-449 
 450-474   454-478   479-503   504-528   529-553   554-578   579-603   604-610   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss