|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 150 responses total. |
sabre
|
|
response 47 of 150:
| 
Jul 25 11:34 UTC 2003 |
Ha Ha I will show up in MI faggot boy. YOU look like a wannabe surfer. I'm
6'3" at 215...all muscle. I will break your scrawny neck pretty boy. I'll tie
you up and let all the grex faggots buttfuck your pussy ass. I will walk up
to you without warning. I will smile and extend my hand as if in greeting but
I will use it to break your fucking jaw. New Yorkers are pussies..at least
most of them are. I can see from your faggot ass picture that it wouldn't take
much to have you cry like a baby.
heh heh...but we will see. After you get your ass beat remember this...You
shot your mouth off and your hummingbird ass couldn't cover it. Oh
yea...twenex confessed that he sucks cock..maybe you and him can have a "butt"
party. You look like you suck alot of cock yourself.
|
scott
|
|
response 48 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:10 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, sure, pussycat, and right now you're using the computer in the gym in
between sets on the lat machine?
|
gull
|
|
response 49 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:53 UTC 2003 |
Re #40: His uniform says he has rights over others, I suppose. I wonder
if he's stricter with people trying to cross the border if he thinks
they're "liberals".
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 50 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:08 UTC 2003 |
/shudders at the thought
|
spectrum
|
|
response 51 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:14 UTC 2003 |
Hello scotty
|
spectrum
|
|
response 52 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:30 UTC 2003 |
sabre......post something useful. I can handle your political threads.
At least they allow two diffrent views to be expressed.
This kind of thread is pure garbage. It doesn't profit anyone.
I don't twit filter you because sometimes you are amusing. Please refrain from
this kind of thread. No one can take your views seriously if you create
threads like this.
|
sabre
|
|
response 53 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:34 UTC 2003 |
RE#48
I can still beat your ass "aikido" man
RE#52
Eat shit..I post whatever I want
|
janc
|
|
response 54 of 150:
|
Jul 25 14:02 UTC 2003 |
Prove it.
|
cross
|
|
response 55 of 150:
|
Jul 25 14:58 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
novomit
|
|
response 56 of 150:
|
Jul 25 15:00 UTC 2003 |
Good idea. lord knows any more shit wouldnt fit in his head.
|
sabre
|
|
response 57 of 150:
|
Jul 25 15:11 UTC 2003 |
Cross I would beat your faggot ass to a pulp. You pussy faced bitch.
I will not make a special trip to NY to beat a pussy's ass like yours.
I am going to MI soon. Why don't you meet me there loser?
I'll beat your ass in front of all grexdom. You're too chickenshit I bet.
I can tell from your pussy faced picture. You act real brave in NY.
NYC is the worst city in the USA. New York is the armpit of planet earth.
You are a total pussy. I bet it comes from sucking so much cock. Tell me fag
boy do you spit or swallow?. I bet you slurp that cum right on dowm.
Go buttfuck your father.
|
edina
|
|
response 58 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:16 UTC 2003 |
I think my question is this: what makes a relationship between two men or
two women, not normal? Is it the sex? If anal sex makes it not normal, does
that mean a husband and wife who enjoy and engage in anal sex aren't normal?
If two lesbians having oral sex isn't normal, if (again) a husband and wife
enjoy and engage in it - are they not normal too?
|
spectrum
|
|
response 59 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:23 UTC 2003 |
Why do people encourage this? If he was ignored he would go away.
|
edina
|
|
response 60 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:31 UTC 2003 |
Because I want to know. What makes a loving relationship between two men or
two women wrong?
|
tod
|
|
response 61 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 62 of 150:
|
Jul 25 18:38 UTC 2003 |
RE#58
Nature has grouped us into two diffrent sexes. It violates the laws of nature
to engage in sexual acts with those of the same sex.
|
novomit
|
|
response 63 of 150:
|
Jul 25 18:51 UTC 2003 |
What about those of us who don't worship nature? And what are hermaphrodites
supposed to do???
|
keesan
|
|
response 64 of 150:
|
Jul 25 18:53 UTC 2003 |
Normal is a statistical term. You can define it as what 90% of people do,
or 98%. If 98%, homosexuality is normal. 'Wrong' is what someone in one
group wants someone in another group to stop doing, not necessarily for any
good reason other than that they are doing something differently from the
first group and the first group wants to feel superior. For the record, Bruce
was, despite being our token conservative, very accepting of his daughter when
she reversed his ideal order of marriage and childbirth.
Sometimes there are things which most people agree are wrong because they hurt
other people, such as murder and theft. Extramarital sex can spread disease
but the chances can be kept pretty low, so maybe it is 1% wrong.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 65 of 150:
|
Jul 25 19:04 UTC 2003 |
Yes, but would Bruce accept it if his son turned out to be gay?
|
tod
|
|
response 66 of 150:
|
Jul 25 19:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
spectrum
|
|
response 67 of 150:
|
Jul 25 19:15 UTC 2003 |
bru is the "token conservative"? I thought there was a 50/50 ratio.
That would promote a better exchange of ideas. I am a conservative also.
I take it that I'm a minority here? Does that mean that I should not feel free
to express my ideals? I hope not. I think both groups can benifit from
healthy debate. Do you dislike bru because he doesn't agree with you on every
issue? I am new here and I'm just wondering
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 68 of 150:
|
Jul 25 19:25 UTC 2003 |
No, there are other reasons for disliking bru ;)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 69 of 150:
|
Jul 25 19:38 UTC 2003 |
Re #62: "Nature", if by that you mean evolution, has evolved a system of
bisexual reproduction. The has absolutly no implications concerning
anything we do with the results of evolution. There are no "laws of
nature" with any relevance to our behavior, apart from natural
consequences of our actions (separating the objective meaning of "laws of
nature" from the subjective); there are only facts of nature. Since
evolution has led to organisms that engage not only in heterosexual
relations but also homosexual relations, they are equally natural.
The idea of "laws of nature" is bizzarre. How are they laid down, and by
what? All there are are facts of nature. The facts of nature do not
mitigate against homosexual behavior, or it couldn't occur. The concept of
"law" in regard to behavior is totally cultural and subjective.
|
bru
|
|
response 70 of 150:
|
Jul 25 22:31 UTC 2003 |
It doesn't matter how you wish to lay out the law.
If God exists, he has stated that such behavior is immoral and wrong.
If you follow nature, people have evolved into a society where most people,
95% follow heterosexual relationships.
My position is that it is wrong because it does not provide a stabe, healthy
relationship. Now, is it unhealthy because society ostracizes them, or are
they ostracized because the activity is unhealthy?
Which came first, the homosexual or the...
Now, my personal belief is that people who indulge in homosexuality are weak
of will. As all sinners are.
The robber is to weak to resist stealing what he wants.
The murderer is to weak to resist the taking of life.
The sexual deviant is to weak to resist the temptation of his choice.
It is indeed a character flaw, a weakness. A giving in to temptation if you
will. We all have them. I have character flaws. I am a sinner. I admit
it. But I am not going to tell you what my sins are, nor would I expect
society to accept my sins if you knew them.
Nor would I get up and yell my sins to the world. It ain't your business.
But if I were to stand up and say, "I have lusted after 17 year old twins,
and thus sinned in my heart." I would expect that part of society that finds
that particular attitude appaling to stand up and say so, and urge me to
repent and find some way to avoid that temptation.
And that is why I tell those who have confessed their particular perversion,
sin, or violation that I believe it to be wrong.
I do not deny them the right to vote.
I do not deny them the right to own property.
I do not deny them the right to free association.
I do not deny them the right to a job of their choosing.
But I will tell them they are wrong. Just as I would any other violator.
Will you deny me that right?
|
scott
|
|
response 71 of 150:
|
Jul 25 22:31 UTC 2003 |
Are you saying you're tempted to perform homosexual acts, Bruce?
|