You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   20-44   45-69   70-94   95-119   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-218 
 
Author Message
25 new of 218 responses total.
johnnie
response 45 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 19:14 UTC 2006

Now this:  

CORPUS CHRISTI, Texas (CNN) -- The fellow hunter who was shot and
wounded by Vice President Dick Cheney has suffered a "minor heart
attack" after a piece of birdshot migrated to his heart, a hospital
spokesman said Tuesday.

Harry Whittington, 78, is in stable condition in intensive care and will
remain hospitalized for up to seven days, hospital officials said.

"Some of the bird shot appears to have moved and lodged into part of his
heart ... in what we would say is a minor heart attack," said Peter
Banko, administrator at Christus Spohn Hospital Corpus Christi-Memorial. 
---------
Sounds like the shooting was more serious than the White House has been
letting on.
happyboy
response 46 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 19:17 UTC 2006

he musta looked alot like a bird thru cheney's scotch-goggles.
tod
response 47 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 19:25 UTC 2006

Harry got peppered perdy good!
happyboy
response 48 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 19:37 UTC 2006

like a denny's tuna sammich!
gull
response 49 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 14 23:25 UTC 2006

Re resp:45: I never expected an incident involving Dick Cheney to 
result in someone *else* having a heart attack. 
 
 
Re resp:40: I guess my question is, if this had been a traffic 
accident, would Cheney have been charged with involuntary manslaughter?  
If so, how is it different just because he used a gun instead of a car? 
 
bru
response 50 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 01:09 UTC 2006

no one has died, no manslaughter.
other
response 51 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 03:57 UTC 2006

Yet.
nharmon
response 52 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 04:09 UTC 2006

Yet. If this guy dies of his wounds, or otherwise as a result of the
gunshot wound, Cheney is on the hook. Or, so he should be.
naftee
response 53 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 04:30 UTC 2006

I've been hit by a pickup truck before.

Was it my fault for not reacting fast enough, or his fault for deciding to
risk a turn and drive into me ?
richard
response 54 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 16:56 UTC 2006

cheney did not have a license to hunt quail.

some example he is setting.  
nharmon
response 55 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 16:59 UTC 2006

Yeah, maybe professional athletes weren't such bad role models after
all, huh? :)
tod
response 56 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 17:37 UTC 2006

I think we can all move beyond this simply by mandating that anything Cheney
kills has to be eaten by him.  If he can't finish what's on his plate then
he can share it buffet style with the Administration.  Setup some big BBQ pits
right there on the White House lawn and get a convoy from Walter-Reed's morgue
going. Snap to it.
nharmon
response 57 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 17:42 UTC 2006

Gross.
tod
response 58 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 17:56 UTC 2006

Yea, disgusting...isn't IT.
johnnie
response 59 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 17:58 UTC 2006

And this:  Apparently, the owner of the ranch where Cheney went on his
rampage hinted in an interview that the Veep may have had "a beer or
two" prior to the shooting, which may not be such a great thing for a
guy with a couple of drunk driving arrests on his record.  
happyboy
response 60 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:00 UTC 2006

but beer is good for lubing up his pacemaker, d00d.
jep
response 61 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:11 UTC 2006

re resp:59: "Apparently" someone said Cheney was drinking?  It's not 
apparent to me.  If there's information, cite it right out in the 
open.  I'm not going to assume there's anything to a story you cite 
like that.

I assume that is all a rumor which was started right here in this item 
as idle speculation because it would be so titillating if there was 
anything to it.  It is nothing short of contemptible to be spreading 
that kind of garbage.  How much lower can you possibly go for a 
standard of reporting and judgement, than to make up a rumor yourself 
out of nothing at all, and then repeatedly cite it as a fact?

I'm not a fan of the vice president or the Administration, but I have 
nothing but disdain and despite for the "drunk hunting" innuendos which 
were started in this item.  No one with the slightest self-respect 
would act in that manner.
tod
response 62 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:24 UTC 2006

re #61
 If there's information, cite it right out in the
 open.
They were wearing orange hunting jackets.  BRIGHT ORANGE jackets.
That's a fact.
jep
response 63 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:28 UTC 2006

Highly enlightening, Todd, as usual.
tod
response 64 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:30 UTC 2006

I'll give you enlightening in the next few new items I post, professor.
richard
response 65 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:40 UTC 2006

it doesnt matter if they were wearing hunting jackets, cheney WAS NOT LICENSED
to hunt quail.  He had no legal right to hunt that particular animal.  He was
licensed to hunt deer.
tod
response 66 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:40 UTC 2006

One question raised by Whittington's condition is just how far from
Whittington was the vice president when he pulled the trigger on his 28-gauge
Perazzi Brescia Italian shotgun. The original report on the incident from the
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department says Cheney was 30 yards away from
Whittington. But the news that one shotgun pellet is now apparently lodged
in the muscle of Whittington's heart will likely lead to a reexamination of
the force with which Whittington was hit, and therefore, of the distance
between the two men when the shooting occurred.

*tipping my drink to drinky guy Cheney*
richard
response 67 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 18:48 UTC 2006

Whitting should sue Cheney and get some of his haliburton money
cyklone
response 68 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:01 UTC 2006

Jep, for what it's worth the drinking angle was not started on Grex. I've come
across it a couple of other times. Apparently, others are capable of deducing
the possibility from the facts known so far.
marcvh
response 69 of 218: Mark Unseen   Feb 15 19:38 UTC 2006

Supposedly MSNBC reported it earlier but then retracted the report.
It's entirely possible that it was simply a misquote or something.
But, since Cheney didn't allow law enforcement officers to talk to 
him until the following day, there's really no way anybody could
conclusively eliminate alcohol as a possible factor.  It's just another
facet of the fact that, even many Republicans agree, Cheney handled
this incident very stupidly.
 0-24   20-44   45-69   70-94   95-119   120-144   145-169   170-194   195-218 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss