|
Grex > Agora47 > #195: Is that Air Force one? No. It's a Gulfstream. | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 101 responses total. |
mcnally
|
|
response 45 of 101:
| 
Dec 1 22:16 UTC 2003 |
(although to be fair, I ate my own Thanksgiving meal on a military
base this year with my sister and some of her officers and their
families and the food was quite respectable.)
|
rcurl
|
|
response 46 of 101:
|
Dec 1 23:10 UTC 2003 |
Re #41: it was an EXPENSIVE campaign stunt on the public dole.
But I agree that it is but one small instance of his lack of judgement. There
are much more substantive issues against BUSH.
|
tod
|
|
response 47 of 101:
|
Dec 1 23:15 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
scott
|
|
response 48 of 101:
|
Dec 2 02:06 UTC 2003 |
Hillary met with actual Afghanies, and Iraquis, too. In broad daylight, not
as a thief in the night like W.
|
klg
|
|
response 49 of 101:
|
Dec 2 02:11 UTC 2003 |
re: "#40 (rcurl): Re #37: that conveys that Bush is interested in
his troops but not in Iraq. . . ." (Some will etc, etc, etc.)
|
klg
|
|
response 50 of 101:
|
Dec 2 02:18 UTC 2003 |
By the way, will nobody here do the decent thing and tell us that Mr.
Bush LIED about spending Thanksgiving in Crawford? Oh, the travesty!
|
other
|
|
response 51 of 101:
|
Dec 2 14:40 UTC 2003 |
No, that would be a REPUBLICAN tactic.
|
gull
|
|
response 52 of 101:
|
Dec 2 15:13 UTC 2003 |
I wonder if Bush's trip was meant partly to overwhelm any publicity
about Hillary's? Republicans seem really paranoid about Hillary running
for President, right now.
|
klg
|
|
response 53 of 101:
|
Dec 2 17:04 UTC 2003 |
No. We are not. From where do you get that idea?
|
tod
|
|
response 54 of 101:
|
Dec 2 18:19 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 55 of 101:
|
Dec 2 18:22 UTC 2003 |
She has to vote on behalf of her constituents on matters that affect
or are affected by the conflict in Iraq.
|
tod
|
|
response 56 of 101:
|
Dec 2 22:59 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 57 of 101:
|
Dec 2 23:57 UTC 2003 |
I'm sure she can visit food stamps whenever she wishes.
|
gull
|
|
response 58 of 101:
|
Dec 3 14:42 UTC 2003 |
Re #53: Nearly every conservative talk show host and columnist I've read
has done at least one article in the last year about how they think
there's a conspiracy afoot in the Democratic Party to set up a Hillary
candidacy in either 2004 or 2008. Generally the theory revolves around
either Clark being a stalking horse for Hillary, or the Clintons setting
up a deliberate loss in 2004 so the field will be open in 2008. William
Safire wrote about this last month, for example.
|
tod
|
|
response 59 of 101:
|
Dec 3 17:08 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
klg
|
|
response 60 of 101:
|
Dec 3 17:15 UTC 2003 |
Mr. gull
You ought to be more discerning. That which Republicans believe is not
necessarily reflected by "conservative talk show hosts and columnists"
(a very tiny sample of what you might call "Republicans") and vice
versa. Quite obviously, the latter are interested in attracting
attention (listeners and readers) and will focus upon that
which "sells" rather than providing a true picture of Republican
interests and beliefs.
Thank you.
klg
|
scott
|
|
response 61 of 101:
|
Dec 3 17:18 UTC 2003 |
Messers klg(s),
We'll bear that in mind the next time you post *any* link from *any* media
source to support *any* of your arguments.
|
klg
|
|
response 62 of 101:
|
Dec 3 17:24 UTC 2003 |
Mr. scott.
As always, you are too kind.
klg
|
johnnie
|
|
response 63 of 101:
|
Dec 4 01:21 UTC 2003 |
Incidentally, it turns out that the story of the British Airways pilot
spotting AirForce1 and nearly blowing the whole plan seems to have been
made up by the folks at the White House. Trying to add a little extra
drama to the project, I guess. Kinda like the whole WMD thing.
|
scott
|
|
response 64 of 101:
|
Dec 4 02:33 UTC 2003 |
Force of habit?
|
johnnie
|
|
response 65 of 101:
|
Dec 4 15:33 UTC 2003 |
And you know that picture of the president holding a tasty-looking
turkey on a platter, surrounded by adoring troops? Turns out the turkey
wasn't real, either. That is, it was an actual turkey, but it was
inedible due to the various things done to pretty it up, a decoration
instead of a meal. A photo-op turkey, in other words (insert Bush joke
here).
|
other
|
|
response 66 of 101:
|
Dec 4 15:45 UTC 2003 |
Plus, it was probably twenty pound lighter than the real thing, you
know, so he wouldn't look like he was struggling to hold it up.
|
flem
|
|
response 67 of 101:
|
Dec 4 18:06 UTC 2003 |
I like this photo-op turkey better:
http://www.polizeros.com/images/2002/10/09/bush_turkey.jpg
|
aruba
|
|
response 68 of 101:
|
Dec 4 19:02 UTC 2003 |
Heh. THat's a good one.
|
bru
|
|
response 69 of 101:
|
Dec 4 19:10 UTC 2003 |
Gee, you think it might have been a CENTERPIECE!?!?!?
Get a life.
|