|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 4 new of 48 responses total. |
jazz
|
|
response 45 of 48:
| 
Mar 25 13:31 UTC 2002 |
Sounds like one of my old roommates. ;)
|
orinoco
|
|
response 46 of 48:
|
Mar 25 17:19 UTC 2002 |
Re #43: I was thinking about it, but I realized most of my arguments would
be based on pretty shallow demographics. My intuition runs something like:
Knows UNIX? Furry. Goes to punk shows? Body mod enthusiast. Does both?
Flip a coin.
The "Leopard guy" was in the Guinness book of records when last I read it,
for having the greatest percentage of his skin tattooed. He's got plain
yellow inked in between the spots, so there's ink covering upwards of 90% of
his skin. I don't recall where he doesn't have it, although I suspect he
might have everything but eyelids and genitals covered.
|
jazz
|
|
response 47 of 48:
|
Mar 26 00:51 UTC 2002 |
I don't know. There are a lot of punk, gothic, and industrial fans
in the technology sector - quite possibly because it's one of the only
decent-paying jobs where you can learn on your own and wear what you choose
- who would have to get all dark and stompy on the plush animal abusers. My
guess is that anyone who's gone through that degree of body modification has
to be an enthusiast of it; it's too great a thing to ask of someone who
isn't in love with the idea.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 48 of 48:
|
Mar 26 01:20 UTC 2002 |
resp:43 the other guy I was talking about with the tiger stripes.
I didn't feel like engaging in a debate about Cat's existence as a
furry.. to wit, I don't have full definitions of what a furry is and
isn't. If he doesn't feel akin to mating with animals, or doesn't
believe he *is* an animal partly in soul, that deflates a lot of the
argument. Sorry.
|