|
Grex > Helpers > #138: Grex System Problems - Winter 2004/2005 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 870 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 449 of 870:
|
Jan 19 04:51 UTC 2005 |
Re 426: the "Do Not Delete" message is an artifact of Pine. If you don't
use Pine, delete it. If you do use Pine, you won't see it.
|
keesan
|
|
response 450 of 870:
|
Jan 19 05:28 UTC 2005 |
Three more mails arrived - is grex cured? I could also send mails out.
|
keesan
|
|
response 451 of 870:
|
Jan 19 05:33 UTC 2005 |
Pine works and I think I replied to a mail, but a mail forwarded from here
elsewhere did not arrive. I can now ssh elsewhere too. (I am dialed in).
If someone fixed grex, thanks. If not, let's hope it stays fixed for two more
weeks.
|
naftee
|
|
response 452 of 870:
|
Jan 19 08:12 UTC 2005 |
GreX is fast and then locks.
That is all.
|
tsty
|
|
response 453 of 870:
|
Jan 19 09:42 UTC 2005 |
grex is fast and fine as of this entry ... whatever was done - thankxx!
|
russ
|
|
response 454 of 870:
|
Jan 19 12:21 UTC 2005 |
Yup, enough of the problem has been fixed to allow mail to flow again.
|
tsty
|
|
response 455 of 870:
|
Jan 19 15:37 UTC 2005 |
oh, did i type too fast in #453 .... bogged & idleded & disconnected
about 3 minutes later ...
|
gull
|
|
response 456 of 870:
|
Jan 19 23:11 UTC 2005 |
It seemed suspiciously like a path MTU discovery problem of some sort.
Pings and such worked, but anything that used larger packets failed.
|
jor
|
|
response 457 of 870:
|
Jan 19 23:12 UTC 2005 |
right. number of bytes.
|
gull
|
|
response 458 of 870:
|
Jan 19 23:50 UTC 2005 |
Yeah. Initially I thought I was having a rerun of an MTU problem I used
to have on my own connection, but then I noticed every site I tried
except Grex was working fine.
|
russ
|
|
response 459 of 870:
|
Jan 20 01:21 UTC 2005 |
The lag problem and the mail-delivery problem appear to have been
fixed completely.
|
naftee
|
|
response 460 of 870:
|
Jan 20 03:38 UTC 2005 |
Whoa.
|
bru
|
|
response 461 of 870:
|
Jan 20 06:28 UTC 2005 |
wanna bet? took nearly 30 seconds to establish the telnet connection over
my eathernet from work.
|
jep
|
|
response 462 of 870:
|
Jan 20 15:59 UTC 2005 |
The system is deadly slow again, both via putty and Backtalk. I assume
someone is aware there is a problem, but there's very little information,
it5 seems, about what is being done about it, or if anything is being
done. Any idea abuot what is causing the problem?
|
cross
|
|
response 463 of 870:
|
Jan 20 18:43 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 464 of 870:
|
Jan 20 19:11 UTC 2005 |
Still very slow.
|
richard
|
|
response 465 of 870:
|
Jan 20 22:37 UTC 2005 |
BAcktalk is barely responding at all. Half the time the pages don't load and
when they do it takes five minutes or more. I couldn't even get to the agora
screen, I had to telnet in finally just to post this
|
gull
|
|
response 466 of 870:
|
Jan 21 01:05 UTC 2005 |
How long will it be before we move to colo? Is it really not worth even
trying to get the upstream problem resolved in the mean time?
Right now I'm even getting intermittent lag on the *dialin*. This morning
dialin was giving me a 1-2 second delay for each character.
|
rksjr
|
|
response 467 of 870:
|
Jan 21 03:07 UTC 2005 |
Re. #463 & #466, postings by cross and gull, referring to "a problem with
an upstream ISP":
Does "a problem with an upstream ISP" mean: unusual use or misuse of the
dsl service by some other customer of the service in such a way as to
limit Grex' normal use of the service?
|
keesan
|
|
response 468 of 870:
|
Jan 21 03:09 UTC 2005 |
What does an upstream ISP have to do with slow dialin, which I just had for
the past 10 minutes (wait 20 sec to see the cursor move)?
If the DSL line is the problem can we cancel wtihout having to pay for the
rest of the contract?
|
cross
|
|
response 469 of 870:
|
Jan 21 03:43 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
richard
|
|
response 470 of 870:
|
Jan 21 04:26 UTC 2005 |
#469...so you are saying its just a *coincidence* that these major lag issues
occurred with in days after grex moving to the new server? The timing has
to make you wonder. maybe grex would be better off back on the old server
for the time being. maybe nextgrex can't handle its job
|
cross
|
|
response 471 of 870:
|
Jan 21 05:00 UTC 2005 |
This response has been erased.
|
russ
|
|
response 472 of 870:
|
Jan 21 05:01 UTC 2005 |
Conditions have deteriorated the point that mail delivery seems to
have halted some time Thursday morning. Lag is bad now and I jave
had to drop one connection because it was stuck.
|
keesan
|
|
response 473 of 870:
|
Jan 21 05:02 UTC 2005 |
Dialed in. Load average 028. It just took me three tries to type that number
and I have to wait 10 sec or so to see what I typed appear onscreen.
0.28. Sometimes things go full speed, sometimes a great deal of lag.
No mail came in recently (for a few hours). How would ISP problems affect
dialins?
|