|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 13 new of 56 responses total. |
jgelinas
|
|
response 44 of 56:
| 
Oct 15 17:41 UTC 2010 |
OK, so the proposal had two endorsements within 48 hours of the final
text being posted. Mr. Treasurer, Sir, is "two" ten percent of the
current membership, allowing this to proceed to a vote?
|
cross
|
|
response 45 of 56:
|
Oct 16 04:45 UTC 2010 |
I think this 10% endorsement for a vote thing needs to go away. That
was enacted in the wake of the popcorn incident, in order to prevent
jp2 from filing motion after motion to get the membership to force
staff's hand in restoring the deleted items. However, that seems
distinctly less relevant now that Grex has only a handful of members.
|
kentn
|
|
response 46 of 56:
|
Oct 16 12:01 UTC 2010 |
With only a handful of members, meeting the 10% requirement is even
easier (e.g. with 6 members, one person is all it takes). I doubt it
would prevent anyone from proposing a lot of changes (all you need are
a couple friends to be members and away you go). It will become more
difficult if we can increase the membership significantly.
|
remmers
|
|
response 47 of 56:
|
Oct 18 12:45 UTC 2010 |
I've started the voting on this proposal. It runs through October 28.
Voting booth: https://grex.org/cgi-bin/pw/voting-booth
|
tsty
|
|
response 48 of 56:
|
Oct 29 06:58 UTC 2010 |
re 44 .. as of midnight last niht .. close of polls, total membershikp
is 10 [ten] ... so 1 [one] woudl do it at the 10% level.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 49 of 56:
|
Oct 29 21:25 UTC 2010 |
First time my vote has ever had such individual power! Did all the board
members rejoin? I'd say that if any didn't, they can't vote at a Board
meeting.
|
kentn
|
|
response 50 of 56:
|
Oct 29 23:39 UTC 2010 |
I see 6 of 7 Board members are members of Grex. One has said he would
pay, but maybe has forgotten.
|
veek
|
|
response 51 of 56:
|
Oct 30 13:49 UTC 2010 |
Re #25: Grex on a laptop. spam - whitelist. Bsdtalk held an interview
with SDF, pretty soon he'll be on the Wiki - bunch of posers *sigh*
anyway..
|
remmers
|
|
response 52 of 56:
|
Oct 31 15:04 UTC 2010 |
Nine eligible members voted. 9 yes, 0 no. The proposal PASSES.
|
jgelinas
|
|
response 53 of 56:
|
Oct 31 15:40 UTC 2010 |
Were there any other votes cast, John?
|
tsty
|
|
response 54 of 56:
|
Nov 1 15:59 UTC 2010 |
good question ... all votes are to be reported, onmly some count for
pass/fail.
|
remmers
|
|
response 55 of 56:
|
Nov 3 19:29 UTC 2010 |
In addition to the official votes reported above, six non-members
voted: 4 yes, 2 no.
|
tsty
|
|
response 56 of 56:
|
Nov 4 06:39 UTC 2010 |
tnx much .. goo djob.
|