You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   17-41   42-66   67-73       
 
Author Message
25 new of 73 responses total.
phenix
response 42 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 22:07 UTC 2002

yha, high school. my collage carrier, so far as it exists to this point,
has not exactly been a social extraviganza
oval
response 43 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 22:26 UTC 2002

yes there are jenny jones candidates in college too. in fact, they're
everywhere. they seem to have terrible tempers. i can hear them outside
screaming at each other when i'm trying to sleep. i think i do a pretty good
job at avoiding them, but some of them are just goddamn loud.
flem
response 44 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 22:45 UTC 2002

There's more than one kind of cock-tease.  There are the malicious ones, who
get a power rush out of deliberately manipulating men, and there are the ones
who flirt for attention and just don't know how to tell when they're
crossing the line.  Innocent, but obnoxious.  
oval
response 45 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:01 UTC 2002

i never considered a man a c*** tease. i have lots of male friends who are
very affectionate with me. we kiss and hug and flirt, but there's no issue
of sex. if i proposition a man who's touchy and flirty and he's not intersted,
does that make him a c*** tease?
phenix
response 46 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:04 UTC 2002

only if he's created the unrealistic expectation of nookie
oval
response 47 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:07 UTC 2002

that answer doesn't satisfy me
orinoco
response 48 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:38 UTC 2002

Then how 'bout "only if he used that expectation to manipulate you."?  If
someone is flirty and physical with me, I make a proposition, and I get turned
down, then there's not necessarily any harm done.  But if that proposition
is used to guilt-trip or blackmail me, or if the promise of getting laid is
being held out like a carrot to get favors out of me, then I start to get
pissed.
oval
response 49 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 00:44 UTC 2002

then he's just a manipulative c***.
lelande
response 50 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 22:03 UTC 2002

if you proposition a man who's touchy and flirty and he's not interested then
he's either scared or wants you to TAKE him, by hook or by crook.
brighn
response 51 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 04:37 UTC 2002

Once again, there's a difference between touchy and flirty, and creating an
expectation of sexual readiness. Also, if I'm fliting with someone and I'm
not serious, and they proposition me as if I'd been serious, I'll tell them
that I could see where there had been a misunderstanding, but I'm really not
interested in anything beyond flirting, sorry. I don't laugh and say, "Sex?
With you? You must be crazy. Where'd you get that silly idea?"
 
And then I re-examine my own flirtation to see if the confusion was justified
by my actions, or if the person just misread signals.
oval
response 52 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 06:10 UTC 2002

okay so then whats exactly the difference between touchy and flirting and
creating an expectation of sexual readiness?
cyklone
response 53 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 06:22 UTC 2002

As Paul mentioned, it sometimes depends on the perceptions of the person
trying to make that determination. OTOH, the more legitimate question
would be "how would a *reasonable* person define the distinction between
'touchy and flirty' and 'creating an expectation of sexual readiness'?" 

oval
response 54 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 06:48 UTC 2002

well i'm hoping a *reasonable* person is willing to provide an answer.
cyklone
response 55 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 14:06 UTC 2002

I'm not sure a reasonable person would post on grex 

;)
brighn
response 56 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 18:33 UTC 2002

In party I gave one example. I had invited a friend from Maine for a weekend,
and it was clear that that weekend would involve sex. A mutual friend from
Saginaw also wanted to visit. Both me and the woman from Maine asked the third
person repeatedly if she was interested in a threesome. Her words, repeatedly,
were, "We'll see" and "Maybe." We told her repeatedly that it was cool if she
didn't want to have sex, no problem, just tell us so we didn't get our
expectations up. Nope, "we'll see" and "maybe." Weekendcomes and goes, no
threesome, which was cool, but she admits later that she never had any
intention of having sex with us, and that she wasn't that sort of girl, etc.
 
So one "reasonable expectation" is, if I ask you if you're interested in sex,
and you say, "Maybe," then the reasonable expectation is that you haven't yet
ruled out the possibility. The direct approach, but most people are too shy
for the direct approach.
 
Another example: If you ever see me in party with mooncat, there's a
better-than-even odds that I'll hit on her, or make some other sexual
innuendo. She and I have an undestanding: She's not interested, I'm interested
but realize she isn't and don't really mind, and she doesn't care how much
I flirt with her as long s I keep my hands to myself and not sabotage any
serious relationships she might have. Groovy. I have no expectation of sexual
readiness on her part, so if she flirts back with me (which she does), I don't
consider that cockteasing.
 
Another example: A week or two back, oval, you asked me here, in this
conference, if I would have sex with you. I answered honestly, because I don't
know you well enough to know whether you were joking, flirting, or serious
(I assumed you were either joking or flirting). Since the question was not
part of a string of flirtations, I didn't consider it to be a profound
indication of sexual readiness, but if you'd followed my answer up with,
"Cool, wanna meet in party and see where it goes?" I would have taken THAT
as a proposition.
 
If you want a clear set of rules that handles every scenario, I can't give
you one. There ARE clear examples of creating an expectation (or not), but
there are likewise many scenarios where the only way of determining
expectations is by asking. Another example: I was flirting online with a guy
who, as far as I knew, was heterosexual  and in a monogamous marriage. As far
as I was concerned, those two details meant that any flirting I did would be
taken as "just playing." He surprised me when he telled me with: "Sorry I'm
not flirting as much with you today. I'm trying to figure out how to tell my
wife about this." [paraphrase, it's been a long time] My initial reaction was
to laugh at him (remember, I admitted to being a cocktease myself, in the
past), then realized that, while I was fully aware of what my intentions were,
someone else could have made other, similarly reasonable conclusions. So I
try not to flirt with people I'm not interested in, now (at least willing to
consider the potential for sex). But I also keep in mind that many people DO
flirt with no intention, and that's ok.
eeyore
response 57 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 7 04:03 UTC 2002

I'm honest enough to admit that I am the worst kind of flirt at
times....mostly with guys (although I do have my moments with women), and
while it's sometimes mild flirting, it's not always.  But the people that I
do massive flirting with are people that I'm comfortable with, and that know
me well enough to flirt massively back, while knowing that it's all in fun
and we'll never end up in bed.  This does include having my hands on people,
although usually in the manner of a back rub, or hugs, or laying my head on
their shoulder or something.  The reality is, I'm a very tactile person.  I
*LIKE* having my hands on people/things.  But if I'm not comfortable around
you, then my hands aren't on you.  And I'm usually not comfortable around
people that I'd like to get into bed....too nervous.  :)

(for those of you who have dealt with me in the touchyfeelyflirt mode, you
can agree or disagree with me as you see fit....I'm just seeing it from my
angle. :)
oval
response 58 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 15:45 UTC 2002

it could be my turn to say something. or not. i feel like maybe it is.
although i can't figure out what to say. <shrugs>
eeyore
response 59 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 17:08 UTC 2002

Tag, Youre it!  :)
oval
response 60 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 21:33 UTC 2002

crap.
phenix
response 61 of 73: Mark Unseen   Jan 8 22:58 UTC 2002

heh. i wanna tag oval:)
sj2
response 62 of 73: Mark Unseen   Mar 7 08:38 UTC 2002

I don't have an issue with jealousy. I think its what you and your 
partner are comfortable with. I am ok with monogamy. Polygamy seems way 
too complicated to be fun. Managing emotions between two people is 
enough for a lifetime, i guess.
ssjgoten
response 63 of 73: Mark Unseen   Oct 23 22:36 UTC 2002

well i am new to this bbs, but if you want my opinion ,i think manogamy is
better because then you can have that one person and you dont have to worry
about pleasing so many people, but non-manogamous relationships you dont have
to worry about just one person, if you piss one person off, there's allways
someone else, just a thought

Goten Sayain

email me at: ssjgoten@cyberspace.org
jazz
response 64 of 73: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 16:52 UTC 2002

        Huh?
orinoco
response 65 of 73: Mark Unseen   Oct 24 22:24 UTC 2002

Manogamy.  You know, the cultural practice of marrying one's hand.  It keeps
you from having to worry about pleasing so many people.
michaela
response 66 of 73: Mark Unseen   Oct 25 03:00 UTC 2002

If you're ambidextrous, is it considered polygamy?
 0-24   17-41   42-66   67-73       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss