You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   17-41   42-66   67-74       
 
Author Message
25 new of 74 responses total.
tod
response 42 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 18:34 UTC 2006

re #40
Exactly.  It was about distributing a lethal prescription to assist a suicide.
It had nothing to do with his personality or the "machine" people are
referring to.  This whole discussion is really an extension of how our
government and corporations control prescription drugs and how the media plays
into it by portraying people like Kevorkian as monsters for making such things
available to those in need.  Fascism at its finest.
Why is it that only a few years ago, everyone was happy to see lawyers and
states going after Microsoft for controlling our lives but nobody wants to
step up to the plate when it comes to Big Brother controlling our medicine?
nharmon
response 43 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 18:49 UTC 2006

Because tod, we're too busy putting freedom on a force-march.
tod
response 44 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 19:06 UTC 2006

Killing our youth over a purple finger, yep.
jep
response 45 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 19:50 UTC 2006

re resp:41: Geez, Rane, can you please give me some warning before 
dropping zingers like that?  I almost swallowed my telephone headset.  
I would not have thought your keyboard was capable of the string, "I 
agree with what jep says".
twenex
response 46 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 20:08 UTC 2006

Oh dear. More humour. You tiresome individual. :-(
tod
response 47 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 20:11 UTC 2006

I agree with #41
cross
response 48 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 21:45 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

tod
response 49 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 21:53 UTC 2006

I prefer the Liotta Tofu Stir Fry in Hannibal
richard
response 50 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 22:56 UTC 2006

Kevorkian has already said that if released he will never do an "assisted
suicide" again.  The reason is that the state of Michigan revoked his
physician's license.  He is an ethical man and believes that ONLY licensed
doctors should be allowed to treat patients.  He will not act as a doctor
since he will never again be licensed to do so.
happyboy
response 51 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 23:07 UTC 2006

re49:"What is that? It smells delicious! *mummble*"

tod
response 52 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 19 23:09 UTC 2006

re #50
Never Say Never

*twangs 007 music on electric mandolin*
nharmon
response 53 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 00:40 UTC 2006

According to Wikipedia, Kevorkian lost his license after the second of
over one hundred assisted suicides. The lack of a physician's license
did not stop him before. Why would it stop him now?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevorkian
tod
response 54 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 01:53 UTC 2006

The terrorists are WINNING
klg
response 55 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 04:08 UTC 2006

That was my recollection, NH.  Richard don't know squat.
richard
response 56 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 15:39 UTC 2006

re #53 wikipedia might be wrong, don't assume everyting you read on wikipedia
is fact.  Kevorkian was also licensed in more than one state.  He has in fact
stated in writing that he will no longer treat patients if he is released.
nharmon
response 57 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 16:27 UTC 2006

I usually give Wikipedia the benefit of the doubt. Unless you have
something that contradicts it?
klg
response 58 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 17:06 UTC 2006

I wonder which definition of "treat" Dr Death has in mind.
johnnie
response 59 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 19:30 UTC 2006

Yes--generally speaking, a doctor "treats" patients to make them better,
to keep them alive.  Killing a person wouldn't conflict with a promise
not to treat them.
richard
response 60 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 19:21 UTC 2006

klg don't call him "dr. death", he has a name.  call him "dr. 
kevorkian"  The man has a family and spent a lot of years helping free 
people who were prisoners of their bodies and of chronic pain.  I don't 
think you can appreciate this issue until or unless you have 
experienced that kind of pain and there is nothing you can do about it, 
or if someone you loved has experienced that kind of pain.  

If a horse or a dog or a cat is in that kind of pain, we put them under 
and call it "humane"  Yet, because of religious thinking that these 
people may not even hold to, they are somehow obliged to stay alive 
even when they are screaming in pain day in and day out.  Go to a 
hospital some time to a Chronic ward klg, listen to the screams.  Then 
tell me you don't think its humane of one of these people wants a way 
to die with dignity, just like dogs and horses get.
nharmon
response 61 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 19:54 UTC 2006

Lets not turn this into a another reason to bash religion. Richard,
would you agree that the fact that his actions were good does not
distract from his being a nutjob?
rcurl
response 62 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 20:42 UTC 2006

I rather considered him just unconventional.
nharmon
response 63 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 21:02 UTC 2006

I think Kevorkian did more harm to his cause than he helped.
rcurl
response 64 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 22:11 UTC 2006

Unconventional people often do that. It isn't always obvious what unconvential
course of action will accomplish an objective: e.g., sometimes demonstrations
help, sometimes they hinder.
klg
response 65 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 22:21 UTC 2006

I didn't realize there was a Mrs. Death.
johnnie
response 66 of 74: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 00:49 UTC 2006

There isn't.  He was engaged once, but broke it off because his fiancee
"was not self-disciplined."  He has said he never married because he
"couldn't find a perfectly compatible partner who shared his values and
goals and interests."  Huh--who woulda figured?

He has a sister, though, and has said he has no friends other than the
guy who used to sell him carbon monoxide for his, uh, activities.

>don't call him "dr. death", he has a name.

Don't fuss--he supposedly likes the nickname.  He acquired it from his
coworkers when he was a resident at Detroit Receiving Hospital many
years ago.  Young Doc Jack requested the night shift because more people
died then. He'd tape open the eyelids of terminal patients so he could
look into their eyes as they died.  He claimed his goal was to discover
how eyes changed at the moment of death (and published a paper on the
topic). He called his "project" the Death Rounds, and would wear a black
armband for added effect. 
 0-24   17-41   42-66   67-74       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss