|
Grex > Pets > #48: What do I do with my cat, now that I'm getting a real baby? |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 95 responses total. |
bhelliom
|
|
response 41 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:04 UTC 2002 |
I didn't say people were bringing emotional issues into this. I said
that this argument was getting emotional and a little personal, and
rather bitter. Plenty of people provided reasons for me to blieve
this.
Why is this any different? Because you did decide to get personal. You
on made the assertion that I am kosher with just ditching pets, that I
have emotional issues with people exercising the given right to state
an opnion. What else have you decided?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 42 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:23 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 43 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:28 UTC 2002 |
#40> I'll give them the benefit of the doubt and say they're stupid people.
Emotionally stunted, at least. Mediocre candidates for parents, but I'll never
meet them or their brat kid, so I really don't care that much.
|
slynne
|
|
response 44 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:29 UTC 2002 |
Ok, it isnt any more insulting than this statement: "This seems to be a
judgemental squabble built on emotion and condemnation with very little
attempt to consider other aspects of the situation. The tone of some
of these post wavers between superior to bitter and hostile." The
implications are that anyone who has posted here saying that they think
is wrong to give up a pet is judgemental (arent we all?), emotional
(and therefore not logical?) That our posts are bitter, hostile and
superior (is this how you see *everyone* who expresses an opinion about
morality?)
I never said that you were kosher with just ditching pets. My question
was rhetorical. I expected you to answer "no" at which point
I could present an argument that this particular couple *is* giving up
a family pet on a whim. I needed to ask that question so I could know
which way to direct my argument. It wasnt intended to be like the
famous "do you still beat your wife" question. Same with the emotional
issues question. I am just wondering. You have shown signs that this
*might* be something that is an emotional issue for you so I am just
wondering if that is the case. The reason being that if it IS something
that is based on some emotional issue, there is no point discussing
this issue anymore.
Frankly I am kind of suprised that you are getting all bent out of
shape about this. It is normal for people to have emotional issues. I
dont find it insulting to suggest that someone might have emotions.
Would you rather I suggested you were a cold heartless emotionless
person? Its kind of funny actually but your reaction has let me know
that at the very least you have some kind of issue with your emotions.
Part of the whole reason it bugs me that someone would throw out a cat
like that is because I have an emotional attachment to cats. I see them
as a member of the family. My emotional issue in this case is very
relevant. If I didnt think that way about cats and thought about them
more the way jep does or the way I think about chickens, goats, pigs
(not raised as pets), etc then it wouldnt bug me that this couple has
abandoned their cat.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 45 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:31 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
brighn
|
|
response 46 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:41 UTC 2002 |
I love the smell of Grex Metadiscussion in the morning...
(Is this post metametadiscussion?)
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 47 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:42 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
johnnie
|
|
response 48 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:45 UTC 2002 |
Just to stir up the pot, a selection from some medical and pet sites:
----
There is an old myth that cats can climb into cribs and “suck the air”
out of babies. While this is generally considered an old wives’ tale, it
may have a basis in fact. Cats are either cuddly creatures or aloof
pets, depending on their temperament. Cuddly creatures enjoy snuggling
up to other cuddly creatures, including babies. Since very young infants
are incapable of turning their heads or moving their bodies away from
the cat, the danger of suffocation does exist. Additionally, some babies
may be sensitive to cat hair or dander, both of which will be deposited
on the sheets when your cat naps.
----
There are number of dangers associated with pets especially when small
children are involved. Infections that can be caused from pets include,
fungal infections (ringworm), scabies, cat-scratch fever,
gastrointestinal infections, respiratory infections, and even strep
throat, just to name a few. However, these infections are rather
uncommon when compared to the trauma that pets may inflict.
Any scratch or bite can get infected, so it is important to clean any
wound very thoroughly. Cats may tend to be more docile, however,
because their teeth are more pointed, bites from these animals tend to
get infected more often.
----
Many young mothers may be concerned about whether a cat can be a danger
to the unborn baby...The fact is, there is a danger of contracting
toxoplasmosis—a parasite that can be transmitted from cat feces.
Toxoplasmosis can be a more severe illness in people with immune-system
problems and in young infants, resulting in damage to the brain and
eyes. In addition, a pregnant woman with toxoplasmosis early in the
pregnancy can pass the infection to her unborn child, leading to severe
mental and physical problems in the infant.
|
randyc
|
|
response 49 of 95:
|
Jul 23 17:47 UTC 2002 |
My cats are both aloof and cuddly. Aloof when you wanna harass them, and
cuddly when you is reading a book. Sometimes cats like to sleep on top of you
so if a person is inlcined to nightmare-having, one may get the notion that
the cat is trying to steal some breath this way. Note: It helps if the person
in question is fairly dim-witted.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 50 of 95:
|
Jul 23 18:22 UTC 2002 |
I'd be happy if the parents saw this discussion, personally. I'd be happy
to say to their faces everything I've said in it.
Being a new parent doesn't give you a right to be an irrational asshole.
|
randyc
|
|
response 51 of 95:
|
Jul 23 18:29 UTC 2002 |
Yeah, but i guess they feel better now that they can use that as an excuse.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 52 of 95:
|
Jul 23 18:33 UTC 2002 |
It even works on some people, amazingly.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 53 of 95:
|
Jul 23 18:45 UTC 2002 |
Regarding for the quote you used: I gave the concession that this was
how the tone of the item *seemed* to me. In my eyes, that did not mean
no one had a right to express themselves in the way that they did. On
the otherhand, it seemed that other aspects of this issue were
overlooked in favor of uniformally condemning the end result.
I'd pretty quickly decided that they made a stupid mistake, but first I
considered what was going on, the mitigating circumstances. It seemed
as if no one was going to voice them even if they already did consider
them, so I did. The implication as to what they would do with their
kids or assuming that they were just so blase --or rather the manner in
which that assumption was expressed-- about tossing out the cat seemed
both bitter and hostile to me. I also did not make a blanket statement
about this; I was very carefully to use the word "some," so as not to
imply that I was referring to every post. Furthermore, some of my
posts that mentioned that there were a couple of things they did right
were competely blown out of proportion and made into an argument that I
did not make.
This particular issue is no more emotional for me than it is for anyone
else in this item. I love my dog and wouldn't give her up for the
world. I put off getting her until I knew I would have the time and
energy to raise a dog. The same holds true with the kitten I just
adopted. Having pets changes certain aspects of ones life, but I knew
that when I decided to adopt Loki and Magnus. Your question did not
pertain to emotions in general, unless I read it incorrectly? You
asked if I had emotional issues with "people verbalizing how they feel
others "should* act?" That goes a lot further than asking if someone
is emotionally invested in this particular argument.
|
slynne
|
|
response 54 of 95:
|
Jul 23 19:17 UTC 2002 |
Yes, I was wondering if you have an emotional issue about "people
verbalizing how they feel others *should* act". I asked this because it
seemed to me that your problem was not that you thought this couple did
the right thing but that you didnt like that they were being criticized
even though you agreed that they were in the wrong here. Why dont you
like that? Is it an emotional response to something else? Does it make
you angry when people are critical of others? Please note the
difference between a question and a statement. I did not say that you
do have an emotional issue here, I am wondering if you do because some
of your statements have indicated that you *might* have one. If I knew
that you have one, I would have made a statement rather than asking a
question. This seems to be a button for you. Why?
You complain that I have overlooked how careful you have been to use
words like "some" but that isnt the case. I didnt notice *any*
responses that were as you described.
I think speculation about what they might do to their kids is valid. It
is just speculation with a lot of "ifs" thrown in. I still believe that
anyone who thinks of a pet the way I do (as a member of the family) and
can still throw it away is a very cold person indeed who probably
wouldnt be what I would consider a good parent. If they feel that pets
arent members of the family, I kind of think they shouldnt have pets
but probably still can be good parents. I dont think that making
assumptions about this couple is totally wrong for the purposes of our
discussion. For all practicle purposes, even though this is a real
couple, this discussion is hypothetical. It isnt really all that unfair
to take this action and then wonder what it means as far as how they
will be as parents.
Basically I am taking an action that I think of as morally wrong and
then saying that anyone who takes that action would be a bad parent.
FWIW, you probably do the same thing or at least I hope you do. Would
you say that a person who abused an animal by beating it would be a
good parent or do you think it isnt fair to make that assumption
without understanding the full situation?
|
ric
|
|
response 55 of 95:
|
Jul 23 21:12 UTC 2002 |
If I thought my cat or my dog were a danger to my baby, sure I'd give them
away. But they're not.
|
slynne
|
|
response 56 of 95:
|
Jul 23 21:21 UTC 2002 |
What would it take for you to think that your cat or your dog were a
danger to your baby?
I dont even have kids but if one of my dogs or my cat hurt a baby, I
would probably have it put to sleep. If one of my dogs bit an older kid
who was provoking it, I probably wouldnt put the dog to sleep but if it
were someone else's kid, I would make sure my dog was never in contact
with that kid again and if it were my kid, we would have a little
discussion about teasing dogs.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 57 of 95:
|
Jul 23 21:43 UTC 2002 |
You'd put your cat to sleep if it, say, scratched a baby who was messing with
it? Or if it made an unprovoked attack?
|
slynne
|
|
response 58 of 95:
|
Jul 23 21:47 UTC 2002 |
I would put my cat to sleep if it made an unprovoked attack. A scratch
isnt really putting a baby in danger. I guess that wasnt clear when I
said "hurt a baby" but I meant "attacked a baby"
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 59 of 95:
|
Jul 23 21:49 UTC 2002 |
I don't know if I would, or if I'd just give it to someone who never had
babies around their house.
|
russ
|
|
response 60 of 95:
|
Jul 24 04:49 UTC 2002 |
Re #12: This sounds more like a power-struggle within the marriage,
and the pregnant wife is throwing her weight around to get rid of the
cat she never liked; the husband is giving in to try to preserve
harmony. The cat is an innocent victim, collateral damage.
If I had a cat, I would *never* give it up for such ridiculous reasons.
(I would probably not marry someone who wouldn't accept my cat.) I
grew up with cats, was practically raised by two Siamese, and would
not want any child of mine to miss that experience.
Besides, there's nothing quite like a warm, purring mass in your lap.
(The fact that I get my jollies from stroking their fur and watching
them divert their fine hunting instincts to chasing inedible or even
immaterial "prey" is a related issue... oh, hell, I admit it. I just
like watching cats have fun, and experiencing the pleasure of another
being.)
|
slynne
|
|
response 61 of 95:
|
Jul 24 13:03 UTC 2002 |
re#59 I would consider that option but my cat is 13 years old and, as
we've already discussed, it is difficult to find a home for a cat that
age. Even nice old cats have trouble getting homes sometimes but who
would take in a mean old cat?
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 62 of 95:
|
Jul 24 14:07 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 63 of 95:
|
Jul 24 14:26 UTC 2002 |
Okay, Dr. Doolittle . . . what kitten do you not want to take home? Is
3.5 lbs small or large for a cat that age?
|
randyc
|
|
response 64 of 95:
|
Jul 24 14:29 UTC 2002 |
My cat vomited on me this morning. Bloody ingrate!
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 65 of 95:
|
Jul 24 14:30 UTC 2002 |
This response has been erased.
|