|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 73 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 41 of 73:
| 
Jan 9 16:28 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 42 of 73:
|
Jan 9 16:33 UTC 2004 |
Ok, correction noted, but in what way does that alter my conclusion
(that there's really no way to prevent item linking by anyone with
fw access to the conference directory without significantly
rewriting picospan to redefine the functions of or create a whole
new class of fw)?
|
jp2
|
|
response 43 of 73:
|
Jan 9 17:05 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 44 of 73:
|
Jan 9 17:15 UTC 2004 |
or #0, since #1 is rather short on verbage of any useful sort.
|
jp2
|
|
response 45 of 73:
|
Jan 9 17:43 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 46 of 73:
|
Jan 9 17:58 UTC 2004 |
Yeah but what's that in binary, huh? :p
|
jp2
|
|
response 47 of 73:
|
Jan 9 18:01 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 48 of 73:
|
Jan 9 19:49 UTC 2004 |
You've been reading too much Doug Adams.
|
mary
|
|
response 49 of 73:
|
Jan 9 21:29 UTC 2004 |
You folks are setting yourself up for disappointment
here. If you enter text in a blog conference, with all
kinds of special rules about how you'll be in control
of your own text, etc., etc., you be begging folks to
save copies of your items just because they can.
Doubt it? Check out M-net about a day after you
start feeling comfortable with your new control.
Grex is public. You shouldn't enter anything here
you don't want public. If you do, the system is
gracious enough to allow you to remove your words.
But we can't go any further and it's unrealistic to
expect we can make your mistakes go away.
|
willcome
|
|
response 50 of 73:
|
Jan 9 21:32 UTC 2004 |
doesn't mean Grex shouldn't try. As a nurse who has performed thousands of
abortions, you should know pretty well the reasons why it's heartless to not
help people clean up their mistakes.
|
jp2
|
|
response 51 of 73:
|
Jan 9 21:34 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 52 of 73:
|
Jan 9 21:37 UTC 2004 |
51: <chuckle> Yup. Sure did.
|
jep
|
|
response 53 of 73:
|
Jan 9 21:44 UTC 2004 |
Mary's got a good point about control of text. On Grex or on any other
system, there is no way for information to be both public and
controlled.
I don't think that means a blog conference or system can't be part of
Grex. I think people just need to be aware that that's the way it is.
|
naftee
|
|
response 54 of 73:
|
Jan 9 23:48 UTC 2004 |
re 48 He makes for good reads.
re 50 YEAH< BEING MARY< SHE SHOULD"VE MARRIED THE PEOPLE < RATHER THAN
ABORT THEM< AGHAHAHA
|
happyboy
|
|
response 55 of 73:
|
Jan 10 01:07 UTC 2004 |
re50:
/shoots fresca out of nose!
|
scott
|
|
response 56 of 73:
|
Jan 10 02:16 UTC 2004 |
Ya know, this is a golden opportunity for us Grexers to FORCE righteous
M-Netters to archive ludicrous amounts of essentially useless text.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 57 of 73:
|
Jan 10 02:25 UTC 2004 |
OOOh, what a Great Idea!
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 58 of 73:
|
Jan 10 04:50 UTC 2004 |
M-Net's got plenty of disk space.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 59 of 73:
|
Jan 10 11:39 UTC 2004 |
and it is FASTER.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 60 of 73:
|
Jan 10 12:22 UTC 2004 |
ya know ya make me hot when ya talk dirty like that.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 61 of 73:
|
Jan 10 14:09 UTC 2004 |
I don't want to make you hot. I've seen what you post about in the sex.cf.
|
naftee
|
|
response 62 of 73:
|
Jan 10 17:06 UTC 2004 |
YEA, he'll come to m-net, where it's HOT and FAST. BOO YEA
|
janc
|
|
response 63 of 73:
|
Jan 10 19:55 UTC 2004 |
A linked item is a hard link, but the item directories are owned by
"cfadm". No fairwitness could link an item by executing "ln" themselves.
If backtalk and picospan were modified not to prevent fw's in those
conferences from executing the "link" command, it would prevent linked
items.
|
jep
|
|
response 64 of 73:
|
Jan 11 03:55 UTC 2004 |
It would take a modification to picospan and backtalk? Somehow I
don't see those two changes as being very likely.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 65 of 73:
|
Jan 11 10:12 UTC 2004 |
resp:61 pretty much in context with the rest of the horrors there ;)
don't read it if you can't handle it
|