You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   378-402   403-427 
 428-452   453-477   478-502   503-527   528-552   553-577   578-602   603-627   628-652 
 653-677   678-680         
 
Author Message
25 new of 680 responses total.
snowth
response 403 of 680: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 03:47 UTC 1997

Isn't it obvious from my response, that it not only hs *one* mind, but
several?
orinoco
response 404 of 680: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 16:50 UTC 1997

Would that make it a symbiotic entity?
carson
response 405 of 680: Mark Unseen   Dec 31 21:09 UTC 1997

(wouldn't it be a parasitic entity?)
snowth
response 406 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 1 08:29 UTC 1998

Isn't this discussion getting just a tad bit too geeky for it's own good?
orinoco
response 407 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 2 15:51 UTC 1998

Are you accusing me of being geeky again?
lilmo
response 408 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 3 19:58 UTC 1998

Who let in the Trill?.
bikeman
response 409 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 06:59 UTC 1998

Isn't a trill when you quickly move between 2 notes on an instrument?
snowth
response 410 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 4 11:50 UTC 1998

Do we care?
orinoco
response 411 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 03:18 UTC 1998

How can you not care about trills?
lilmo
response 412 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 20:37 UTC 1998

Is no one else here a Star Trek fan?
bikeman
response 413 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 5 21:02 UTC 1998

Would you hate me if I said I didn't?
carson
response 414 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 18:22 UTC 1998

(do you think that I wouldn't make you suffer at the hands [so to speak]
of the terrible Tribbles?)

snowth
response 415 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 19:53 UTC 1998

what hands?
diznave
response 416 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 6 23:40 UTC 1998

Can you believe that in between semesters, they close the computer labs? So,
Dan, they're not still picking on you, are they? Sean, do you play any
instruments?
orinoco
response 417 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 9 00:27 UTC 1998

(Can you belive this guy?  Actually trying to have a coherent conversation,
is he?  Isn't it shocking?!)
carson
response 418 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 10 01:13 UTC 1998

(can you believe this guy, swiping my parentheses?)
bikeman
response 419 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 02:11 UTC 1998

Is it even possible to have a conversation in ANY of these confrences?
orinoco
response 420 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 11 02:36 UTC 1998

How dare you accuse me of swiping 'your' parentheses?  Just because you use
parentheses for everything, does that mean the rest of us cannot make the
occasional honest parenthetical remark?
bikeman
response 421 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 02:32 UTC 1998

Can't we all just get along?
carson
response 422 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 12 19:09 UTC 1998

(what should I use for a parenthetical remark?)
lilmo
response 423 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 01:46 UTC 1998

Shouldn't you use parentheses?
orinoco
response 424 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 13 03:28 UTC 1998

Would double parentheses ((like these)) perhaps be in order?
carson
response 425 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 14 01:39 UTC 1998

[can I give up now? please?]
lilmo
response 426 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 15 22:17 UTC 1998

Should we let him?
carson
response 427 of 680: Mark Unseen   Jan 16 00:14 UTC 1998

(do you mean blood let?)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   375-399   378-402   403-427 
 428-452   453-477   478-502   503-527   528-552   553-577   578-602   603-627   628-652 
 653-677   678-680         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss