You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-4   4-28   29-52        
 
Author Message
25 new of 52 responses total.
slynne
response 4 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 15:13 UTC 2003

Well, we could improve the hardware (so things are faster). I 
understand this is already in the works. 

We can try to attract some interesting new people into the conferences 
and/or party. This is pretty hard. I am not exactly sure how to do 
this. 

mynxcat
response 5 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 15:24 UTC 2003

That's a good start. We are discussing the latter point in coop at 
this moment. So if you have ideas, or are interested in what people's 
ideas are, that's a good place to start. I want to say it's item 47, 
or thereabouts.
slynne
response 6 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 15:42 UTC 2003

Yes, I have been reading that item. :)
jep
response 7 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 15:46 UTC 2003

Technically, I'm mainly frustrated with Grex's speed.  I like the 
interfaces and the system itself.  There are some things I'd like to 
see, such as POP mail.  If passwords are still being expired 
periodically, they shouldn't be, but the staff likes crud like that and 
I'm never going to win any battles on the subject.  Life will go on.

Socially, Grex is open to anyone but still manages not to be a slime 
pit somehow.  I don't understand how this happens, but it works.  There 
are quite a few local social events, such as the weekly walk, Board 
meetings, and Grexpeditions, so that if you can make it to Ann Arbor 
you can meet some of the people you talk to on-line.

Grex is a community.  No community anywhere is completely open to 
anyone who happens by.  It is possible to join Grex's community, but I 
don't know how to make it easy, and am not sure it ought to be easier 
than it is.

I'm pretty happy with Grex as it is.  That's why I keep coming back.
mynxcat
response 8 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:07 UTC 2003

I like the interfaces too. At least backtalk. I prefer it to the new-
fangled discussion boards out there that make it hard to follow items. 
Pico could have been a little more intuitive, but I'm used to it now. 
Sometimes, when I see a new user post in bbs, and it looks like they 
were having trouble with it, I wish it was simpler. I know it took me 
a while to get used to the interface, and I guess I was bored enough 
to keep trying. :)

Community wise, you know my stand :) But to be fair, I personally have 
been pretty happy with the acceptance I've had from most 
members/users. Improvements could be made, true, and they'll take 
time, but I'd like it not to stagnate, which I think it has/had.

jp2
response 9 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 16:43 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 10 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 17:25 UTC 2003

I don't know if POP *and* IMAP are necessary.  If we decide to supply
IMAP access, do we really need POP?
jp2
response 11 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 18:05 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 12 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 19:06 UTC 2003

(I use both on my main mail box.  IMAP to delete messages I don't want on
my disk at all, and POP to get the ones I do want.  Actually, I use Pine and
MH.)
jp2
response 13 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 20:01 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 14 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 20:25 UTC 2003

I wasn't arguing from a system load standpoint, I just don't believe in
having any more ports open than necessary. ;>
jp2
response 15 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 20:48 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

gull
response 16 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 20:56 UTC 2003

True.  I just looked at the email program on my PDA, and it only seems
to support POP.
katie
response 17 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 21:25 UTC 2003

It bums me that my email can't function like everybody else's (can't
get attachments, etc)\
krj
response 18 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 22:00 UTC 2003

Another vote for improving the speed of conferencing via Backtalk.
Cafe Utne runs a similar interface (Motet, derived from Picospan via
the Well) and is nice and crisp, and yes I know they've got thousands
of extra dollars to spend.  Grex's Backtalk suffers sadly in comparison.
jep
response 19 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 22:01 UTC 2003

Backtalk is much, much faster on M-Net, which lives hand to mouth.  M-
Net's bank account is often reported in the tens of dollars.
mynxcat
response 20 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 22:16 UTC 2003

I like backtalk's interface, but it could be faster. I vouch for mnet's faster
backtalk. 

katie - do you mean your email on grex?
katie
response 21 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 5 22:18 UTC 2003

Yes, it's the only email I have. Attachments arrive as screenfuls of
garbage characters, with no way to interrupt it.
null
response 22 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 01:06 UTC 2003

I wish backtalk here ran over a secure connection so passwords wouldn't 
be sent in plaintext.
tod
response 23 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 01:16 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

richard
response 24 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 03:06 UTC 2003

Grex's reason d'etre is its conferences.  But every time I suggest grex
re-organizing its conferences, eliminating dead or dormant ones, and combining
redundant ones (of which there are more than a few convering the same
material), I get shot down.  People seem to want Grex to be a museum, and even
if a conf hasn't had a post in several years, keep it around JUST IN CASE.
I still think Grex needs to re-organize its conferences as I suggested, and
develop a new conferencing menu.  There are too many people who come to grex
and just use party and don't even realize there are conferences, or they think
Agora is the only conference.  
gelinas
response 25 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 03:12 UTC 2003

I see no reason to remove conferences.  My conference list includes many that
get fewer than a response a year.  And it does not include many others that
are probably far more active.  I don't (much) care if someone says something
in jellyware every other minute.  I do care if someone says something in
rialto.

Ce'st la vie.
gelinas
response 26 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 03:16 UTC 2003

BTW, there are also items I follow in a couple of different conferences.
For example, I read the System Problems items in both agora and helpers.
lorance
response 27 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 04:36 UTC 2003

I personally like Grex the way it is. Sure it's slow at times, but so is my
connection. I love reading the conferences and am now finally participating.
I would become a member just to support Grex if I could afford it. But since
I can't even afford a Net connection of my own it will have to wait.

It would be nice to see a little less bickering. I support the staff whole
hartedly. They get too much greif for the ammount of work they do at no pay!
twenex
response 28 of 52: Mark Unseen   Dec 6 10:31 UTC 2003

I'm not sure that I want GREX to be a museum,
but it's certainly interesting (only for a
relative newcomer, perhaps) to be able to see the
"evolution" of the system. Deleting old confs
also means someone(s) has/have to sit down and
decide which confs to delete, and any arbitrary
date you can think of is bound to raise
objections. ALso, making the case ofor making the
space is a bit incongruous when we're waiting for
a new system with more space. The economics of
the PC market are such that any new upgrade to
give us jmore space, if timely made, is likely to
be more cost effective per unit of bytes than the
last one, whilst people's time generaly gets more
wexpensive over time, not cheaper (fi you work it
out based on the amount of $ you would get if you
were working at GREX "professionally"). Getting
rid of cruft sounds like a good idea, but on top
of all the above, you open yourself up to the
temptation to "modernise" the system even more by
ading this, that and the other, which again is
expensive in administratio time and could very
well turn out to be a boondoggle. The one thing
I'd like to see GREX add - X - is not likely to
be added anyway, given the impracticality of
using it over dialup and telnet aaround Michigan,
never mind on some b ox somewhere over the
Rainbow, er, Atlantic. What might be more useful
is to see what, if any, changes are made to our
work environment on NextGREX, and then figuring
out, perhaps at a board meeting or series
thereof, what other changes that haven't already
happened need to be made in order to turn our
new system into "out beloved old system", or
improve it where it's generally agreed that GREX
sucked.

Remember - people have been using hte wheel and
axle essentially unchanged for thousands of
years!
 0-4   4-28   29-52        
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss