You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   14-38   39-63   64-76       
 
Author Message
25 new of 76 responses total.
flem
response 39 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 02:26 UTC 2002

One of my coworkers has XM radio.  He seems pretty happy with it, though I'm
a little less than impressed with the variety of what I hear from his office.
  w.r.t.  classical stations, I've still not seen a match for andante.com.
I've started to check out bbc radio a little, based on ken's rantings :) but
I've yet to find any shows that I'm really impressed with.  Not ready to give
up yet, though...
tpryan
response 40 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 02:44 UTC 2002

        94.9fm is classic rock that rocks.  The station pats itself on
the back a bit less often, also.
krj
response 41 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 03:31 UTC 2002

flem in resp:39 :: are you paying for andante?  Can you lay out some 
details about their audio operations?  I've only used their site to 
read text articles.
krj
response 42 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 03:49 UTC 2002

Also, flem in resp:39 :: can you go into some detail about how 
your coworker gets XM Radio in his office?  Thanks.
flem
response 43 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 16:56 UTC 2002

I'm not paying for Andante.  They seem to have a couple of tiers of streaming
audio.  "Andante Radio" is free, linked to from the main page.  No
commercials, except thirty seconds every half hour or so advertizing their
membership services.  These seem to include live concert broadcasts as well as 
on-demand streaming of various recordings.  I've not really looked into it 
a great deal.  
  My coworker bought an XM unit that can be removed from the car and plugged 
into a second adapter/antenna thingy in the office.  It has a normal audio
output, that he plugs into a small desktop stereo system.  He has had some 
trouble with the reception inside the office, but he has a window (pointing
east, I think) and has found (and carefully marked) a couple of spots 
near the window that seem to do all right.  
keesan
response 44 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 20:27 UTC 2002

Can you buy one that is sold for use ONLY without a car? (one not two adaptor
thingies)
tpryan
response 45 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 12 23:35 UTC 2002

        This line is hear so I can find the item in general and 
forget it there, as agora is about to rap up.
gull
response 46 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 16:53 UTC 2002

What scares me about XM is it appears to be a proprietary system.  I'd hate
to buy a $300 head unit and have it become a $300 dash filler plate when the
company went out of business.

That and, well, if I want music in the car I don't get on broadcast radio, I
can just use my MP3 player or pop in a cassette.
dbratman
response 47 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 18:14 UTC 2002

The original article (sorry to get back to that) may be scary, but no 
scarier than those old "pop star interview" LPs I've occasionally seen 
in used-record stores.  They were distributed to local radio DJs along 
with scripts.  You, the DJ, read the questions from the script, pop the 
needle down on the record appropriately, and - this is almost an exact 
quote from the blurb - it'll sound like Famous Star is RIGHT THERE in 
the studio with YOU!

Early 60s, most of this stuff, IIRC.  Nothing's changed.
jep
response 48 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 18:16 UTC 2002

What scares me is that it's proprietary and requires monthly 
subscriptions fees.  I don't have that much use for coast-to-coast 
radio, since I travel out of the state about once per year.
gull
response 49 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 18:52 UTC 2002

For me, too, one of the fun parts of travelling is listening to different
radio stations.  I particularly like tuning around the AM dial at night.  I
can remember driving through Tennessee after dark listening to WABC New York. 
It was coming in strong, but with that periodic fading you only hear on
skywave-propegated signals.  Fun stuff. :)
keesan
response 50 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 19:14 UTC 2002

The $10/month is instead of wasting time with commercials.
slynne
response 51 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 14 19:17 UTC 2002

The commercials sometimes are pretty entertaining especially out in 
BFE. 
keesan
response 52 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 00:07 UTC 2002

What is BFE?
jazz
response 53 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 05:28 UTC 2002

        Anal intercourse, Egypt.
gull
response 54 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 15:06 UTC 2002

I'm skeptical.  A lot of cable TV networks were commercial free at first,
too, but that didn't last long.  Now you pay a subscription fee to watch
commercial breaks longer than those on broadcast TV.
jazz
response 55 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 15:09 UTC 2002

        Comcast continues Mediaone's sordid tradition of selling late-night
airtime to infomercial providers.  It's virtually impossoble to find
programming after 2 am.
keesan
response 56 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 15 16:30 UTC 2002

Do you have a VCR?
other
response 57 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 16 07:23 UTC 2002

I wonder what the origin of the BFE reference is.  I've known it most of my
life.
slynne
response 58 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 16:18 UTC 2002

Heh, I remember hearing BFE as a child although I didnt know what it 
stood for until later. Where would something like that come from? "Butt 
Fuck, Egypt" It makes no sense. 
krj
response 59 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 06:04 UTC 2002

Slashdot pointed to an interesting article about the Sirius satellite
radio system, the competitor to XM.  I'm not sure I fully understand
it, but I think Sirius is asking the FCC to restrict the usage of 
the 802.11 wireless networking frequencies, because those frequencies
are close enough to the Sirius frequencies that the music 
service is seeing some interference issues.
jmsaul
response 60 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 06:47 UTC 2002

Stupid f*ckers.  Hopefully, they'll get slapped down.
gull
response 61 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 13:37 UTC 2002

It wouldn't surprise me.  802.11 is rapidly becoming the new Citizen's Band,
complete with a total disregard for the legal limits on effective radiated
power. ;)
jp2
response 62 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 17:14 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

gull
response 63 of 76: Mark Unseen   Mar 19 19:46 UTC 2002

Oh?  Are they operating under Part 15?
 0-24   14-38   39-63   64-76       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss