You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   363-387   388-412   413-424 
 
Author Message
25 new of 424 responses total.
naftee
response 388 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 17:03 UTC 2004

The above is an excellent choice for a parody.
jp2
response 389 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 19:31 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 390 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 21:36 UTC 2004

I filter your mom
jp2
response 391 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 7 21:45 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 392 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 01:10 UTC 2004

Re 382, where Valerie comments on the deletion of the items quoting
Plato's Republic:  In fact, staff _did_ contact the fairwitness and _did_
wait for her to remove the items.  There were one or two staff members
who were willing to act, but most of us felt the right thing to do,
in light of the current controversy, was to wait of Katie.  So we did.
tod
response 393 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 03:37 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 394 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 04:33 UTC 2004

valerie, you lose more credibility and respect with every additional word you
write.  Your reaction to something done elsewhere and overt action (negative,
IMO) against grex do not demonstrate justification one iota.  I acknowledge
that those you feel wronged you are also participating in the issue here on
grex.  But you did not take the high road.  And that is something you will
not admit, and that is what I dislike the most about this whole thing.
jmsaul
response 395 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 07:02 UTC 2004

Re #387:  For better or worse, people who have no sense of humor about
          themselves are excellent targets for parody.
jaklumen
response 396 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 09:59 UTC 2004

resp:382 #4 & #5 Good God.  Have you read *anything* concerning what 
has been written say, in the discretion of blogging?  What has been 
written there could well be applied to a situation such as yours.  The 
point is not so much "punishment" but that personal information should 
be handled carefully on public forums, be they bbs, weblog/live 
journal, etc.  We've said that a number of times now.

I think what the big issue has been with the deleted items is that 
people replied to them.  Their responses were deleted without their 
permission.  Anything else, other arguments, I believe, are lesser-- 
arguments that the items had value for others besides the authors, etc.

What do people want from Grex?  This is a public forum-- personal 
information is going to be subject to some scrutiny.  Policy is always 
a band-aid/tailpipe solution at best.  People will either have to be 
comfortable with the fact that such words can be exploited, or they 
maybe shouldn't share-- or share so much.  I think we said there are 
forums a little less public than this-- a little more secure.
naftee
response 397 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 15:19 UTC 2004

Your 'big issue' is correct.
keesan
response 398 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 15:39 UTC 2004

Re 395 - by 'excellent targets' do you mean for the purpose of hurting
people?
jmsaul
response 399 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 16:10 UTC 2004

Re #398:  No, I mean that people with no sense of humor about themselves are
          usually extremely funny to others.  (If they had a sense of humor
          about themselves, they'd know how funny they are, and could either
          change their behavior or accept it as humorous and move on.)  
tod
response 400 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

iggy
response 401 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 18:55 UTC 2004

"wont somebody please think of the CHILDREN? My poor innocent babies?"
um.. 
were the excruciating details of your personal life entered under duress?  
Was someone forcing you to not thinkk of your own words or how they would
affect your own children when you entered them?  
Really, If it was harmless to them THEN, it is harmless to them NOW.
happyboy
response 402 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 20:37 UTC 2004

...even if she entered them in some sort of OCD spaz-out
she still ENTERED them.

YOU CAN'T TAKE BACK WHAT YOU SAID, VAL, EVEN IF YOU
WERE FLORIDLY PSYCHOTIC WHEN YOU ENTERED THOSE ITEMS.

you stole from me, vandal.
naftee
response 403 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:55 UTC 2004

She violated you, did she.
happyboy
response 404 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 07:46 UTC 2004



        *sniff*


        :(~~~
remmers
response 405 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:03 UTC 2004

The treasurer has informed me that the voter list is up to date.
With 52 out of 82 eligible members voting, the results are:

        yes     15
        no      37

The motion fails.
ryan
response 406 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:08 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

boltwitz
response 407 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 20:43 UTC 2004

Thanks for eating your own children, Jews.
naftee
response 408 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 21:45 UTC 2004

Nazis.
cyklone
response 409 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 00:13 UTC 2004

Pussies
boltwitz
response 410 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 00:19 UTC 2004

Whores.
anderyn
response 411 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 00:30 UTC 2004

Now that's a mature response. And so mysogonistic too.
boltwitz
response 412 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 10 00:34 UTC 2004

Yeah.  Whores.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-374   363-387   388-412   413-424 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss