|
Grex > Helpers > #134: Grex System Problems - Summer 2004 |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 286 responses total. |
i
|
|
response 38 of 286:
| 
Jul 18 22:10 UTC 2004 |
Grex was down from about 6:24AM to 6:00PM (EDT) today due to another hardware
lockup/crash. Too warm in the pumpkin, bad alignment of stars, or what?
|
cross
|
|
response 39 of 286:
|
Jul 18 22:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 40 of 286:
|
Jul 19 02:12 UTC 2004 |
New fan?
|
bru
|
|
response 41 of 286:
|
Jul 19 06:21 UTC 2004 |
or the effects of polytarps actions.
|
gregb
|
|
response 42 of 286:
|
Jul 19 14:45 UTC 2004 |
If he's alaising as Pgreen, I vote for the latter.
|
keesan
|
|
response 43 of 286:
|
Jul 19 21:50 UTC 2004 |
174 new items in agora.
|
cross
|
|
response 44 of 286:
|
Jul 20 01:23 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gregb
|
|
response 45 of 286:
|
Jul 20 01:28 UTC 2004 |
<RANT>
Just zap his ass. It was very tedious getting rid of all his @#$% from
my topics list (I use Backtalk). How much of this stupid crap do we
have to put up with before something gets done?
</RANT>
|
tpryan
|
|
response 46 of 286:
|
Jul 20 03:26 UTC 2004 |
Dan, I give more authority to ask 'em to stop than it has
for posting them.
|
naftee
|
|
response 47 of 286:
|
Jul 20 03:33 UTC 2004 |
re 44 Can you please retire those items?
|
glenda
|
|
response 48 of 286:
|
Jul 20 04:19 UTC 2004 |
I believe that they have been removed.
|
cross
|
|
response 49 of 286:
|
Jul 20 04:52 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
tsty
|
|
response 50 of 286:
|
Jul 20 07:29 UTC 2004 |
hell, a buncha of us *wish* we could take credit for the salvation.
congratulations to whomever it was!
/
|
naftee
|
|
response 51 of 286:
|
Jul 21 02:18 UTC 2004 |
re 49 oic, but why'd it take so long ?!
|
jor
|
|
response 52 of 286:
|
Jul 21 12:09 UTC 2004 |
grex: telnet
/tmp: write failed, file system is full
/tmp: write failed, file system is full
/usr/local/grex-scripts/.inet_real/telnet>
|
jor
|
|
response 53 of 286:
|
Jul 21 12:11 UTC 2004 |
grex: df
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/sd0a 109823 73971 24870 75% /
/dev/sd0d 156783 120973 20132 86% /usr
/dev/sd6h 1971009 1798533 0 101% /usr/local
/dev/sd0e 706783 372750 263355 59% /bbs
/dev/sd0f 471183 450069 0 106% /x
/dev/sd6g 1969885 1621510 151387 91% /var
/dev/sd7h 1969885 1026946 745951 58% /var/spool/mail
/dev/sd2a 31023 16317 11604 58% /rootbak
/dev/sd2d 31023 15998 11923 57% /suidbin
/dev/sd2f 62863 56584 0 100% /tmp
/dev/sd2h 842574 709514 48803 94% /s
/dev/sd4a 1944365 1749935 0 100% /c
/dev/sd7g 1971009 774405 999504 44% /d
/dev/sd11g 1971692 1733443 41080 98% /a
/dev/sd2e 699223 455142 174159 72% /oldvar
grex:
|
naftee
|
|
response 54 of 286:
|
Jul 21 15:48 UTC 2004 |
Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/sd0a 109823 73979 24862 75% /
/dev/sd0d 156783 121239 19866 86% /usr
/dev/sd6h 1971009 1798541 0 101% /usr/local
/dev/sd0e 706783 372754 263351 59% /bbs
/dev/sd0f 471183 450069 0 106% /x
/dev/sd6g 1969885 1629334 143563 92% /var
/dev/sd7h 1969885 1028824 744073 58% /var/spool/mail
/dev/sd2a 31023 16317 11604 58% /rootbak
/dev/sd2d 31023 15998 11923 57% /suidbin
/dev/sd2f 62863 3873 52704 7% /tmp
/dev/sd2h 842574 709514 48803 94% /s
/dev/sd4a 1944365 1671559 78370 96% /c
/dev/sd7g 1971009 780978 992931 44% /d
/dev/sd11g 1971692 1733229 41294 98% /a
/dev/sd2e 699223 455142 174159 72% /oldvar
|
rcurl
|
|
response 55 of 286:
|
Jul 22 05:26 UTC 2004 |
The vandal has struck here too - 50 newresponse items, with many just
'activations' of items with no response entered. Does Grex have any
way to stop these denial-of-service attacks?
|
glenda
|
|
response 56 of 286:
|
Jul 22 05:34 UTC 2004 |
These are the result of Tod scribbling all his responses yet again.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 57 of 286:
|
Jul 22 05:37 UTC 2004 |
It sure is a nuisance.
|
glenda
|
|
response 58 of 286:
|
Jul 22 05:39 UTC 2004 |
He hit almost every cf, including 107 new responses in Fall 2003 Agora and
60 in Winter 2003/2004.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 59 of 286:
|
Jul 22 05:57 UTC 2004 |
It would be useful if responses could only be scribbled within some short
time - 24 hours? - after posting them.
|
mfp
|
|
response 60 of 286:
|
Jul 22 06:53 UTC 2004 |
That's not technically feasible. Especially since no-one's going to spend
any time doing it. Since they aren't even making New Grex go.
|
slynne
|
|
response 61 of 286:
|
Jul 22 15:19 UTC 2004 |
resp:59 - yes, it would be useful if that were the rule. We could have
avoided the whole valerie and jep thing if that were the case. As it
is, as long as we allow some users to delete their posts, we have to
allow everyone to do it even if some people choose to be obnoxious
about it.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 62 of 286:
|
Jul 22 17:03 UTC 2004 |
I don't think a limit on scribbling is warranted, as much as I'm annoyed.
As intelligently as he writes, tod is acting like a moron every time he does
this. Maybe he's trying to keep up with the polytarp's in the twit race...
|