|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 150 responses total. |
tod
|
|
response 38 of 150:
| 
Jul 24 23:25 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 39 of 150:
|
Jul 24 23:30 UTC 2003 |
RE# 25
happyboy is a trip
|
rcurl
|
|
response 40 of 150:
|
Jul 25 00:50 UTC 2003 |
Re #37: you can say it is wrong for yourself, but you have no right to
consider it wrong for someone else. Since when have you been given rights
over others?
(Re #35: there's that jerk again with a "lot of mouth and bravado".)
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 41 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:00 UTC 2003 |
Re 38> I ignored most of this thread, but that comment made me laugh out loud.
Call me insensitive :P
|
bru
|
|
response 42 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:04 UTC 2003 |
No. I can say it is not normal for anybody. That it is wrong for people to
behave in certain ways. Thats what we do with our laws, we tell people that
what they are doing is wrong. Doesn't matter if it is sex, drugs, assault,
or murder.
You say it isn't illegal. That may be true, but it was at one time, adn
whether a law says it is illegal or not, it is wrong. many things are legal
that are wrong.
|
ea
|
|
response 43 of 150:
|
Jul 25 02:06 UTC 2003 |
re #37 - ok, that makes sense. (Although, I agree with whoever earlier
said to wear the gun, it's part of your uniform, and you shouldn't have
to ask)
|
cross
|
|
response 44 of 150:
|
Jul 25 04:21 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
pvn
|
|
response 45 of 150:
|
Jul 25 04:32 UTC 2003 |
re#40*: THe US Constitution spells out the right of the individual
to tell other people what is right or wrong. It even establishes the
mechanism whereby it is done.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 46 of 150:
|
Jul 25 06:30 UTC 2003 |
Re #42: so, you consider it "wrong". Please tell us what precisely you
consider "wrong" with it. Please also don't obfuscate by saying it is not
"normal", or explain why you think it not normal while those that engage
consensually in homosexual activities find it perfectly normal. Do you
have personal experience with it to be able to judge whether it is
"normal" or not?
|
sabre
|
|
response 47 of 150:
|
Jul 25 11:34 UTC 2003 |
Ha Ha I will show up in MI faggot boy. YOU look like a wannabe surfer. I'm
6'3" at 215...all muscle. I will break your scrawny neck pretty boy. I'll tie
you up and let all the grex faggots buttfuck your pussy ass. I will walk up
to you without warning. I will smile and extend my hand as if in greeting but
I will use it to break your fucking jaw. New Yorkers are pussies..at least
most of them are. I can see from your faggot ass picture that it wouldn't take
much to have you cry like a baby.
heh heh...but we will see. After you get your ass beat remember this...You
shot your mouth off and your hummingbird ass couldn't cover it. Oh
yea...twenex confessed that he sucks cock..maybe you and him can have a "butt"
party. You look like you suck alot of cock yourself.
|
scott
|
|
response 48 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:10 UTC 2003 |
Yeah, sure, pussycat, and right now you're using the computer in the gym in
between sets on the lat machine?
|
gull
|
|
response 49 of 150:
|
Jul 25 12:53 UTC 2003 |
Re #40: His uniform says he has rights over others, I suppose. I wonder
if he's stricter with people trying to cross the border if he thinks
they're "liberals".
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 50 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:08 UTC 2003 |
/shudders at the thought
|
spectrum
|
|
response 51 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:14 UTC 2003 |
Hello scotty
|
spectrum
|
|
response 52 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:30 UTC 2003 |
sabre......post something useful. I can handle your political threads.
At least they allow two diffrent views to be expressed.
This kind of thread is pure garbage. It doesn't profit anyone.
I don't twit filter you because sometimes you are amusing. Please refrain from
this kind of thread. No one can take your views seriously if you create
threads like this.
|
sabre
|
|
response 53 of 150:
|
Jul 25 13:34 UTC 2003 |
RE#48
I can still beat your ass "aikido" man
RE#52
Eat shit..I post whatever I want
|
janc
|
|
response 54 of 150:
|
Jul 25 14:02 UTC 2003 |
Prove it.
|
cross
|
|
response 55 of 150:
|
Jul 25 14:58 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
novomit
|
|
response 56 of 150:
|
Jul 25 15:00 UTC 2003 |
Good idea. lord knows any more shit wouldnt fit in his head.
|
sabre
|
|
response 57 of 150:
|
Jul 25 15:11 UTC 2003 |
Cross I would beat your faggot ass to a pulp. You pussy faced bitch.
I will not make a special trip to NY to beat a pussy's ass like yours.
I am going to MI soon. Why don't you meet me there loser?
I'll beat your ass in front of all grexdom. You're too chickenshit I bet.
I can tell from your pussy faced picture. You act real brave in NY.
NYC is the worst city in the USA. New York is the armpit of planet earth.
You are a total pussy. I bet it comes from sucking so much cock. Tell me fag
boy do you spit or swallow?. I bet you slurp that cum right on dowm.
Go buttfuck your father.
|
edina
|
|
response 58 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:16 UTC 2003 |
I think my question is this: what makes a relationship between two men or
two women, not normal? Is it the sex? If anal sex makes it not normal, does
that mean a husband and wife who enjoy and engage in anal sex aren't normal?
If two lesbians having oral sex isn't normal, if (again) a husband and wife
enjoy and engage in it - are they not normal too?
|
spectrum
|
|
response 59 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:23 UTC 2003 |
Why do people encourage this? If he was ignored he would go away.
|
edina
|
|
response 60 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:31 UTC 2003 |
Because I want to know. What makes a loving relationship between two men or
two women wrong?
|
tod
|
|
response 61 of 150:
|
Jul 25 16:57 UTC 2003 |
This response has been erased.
|
sabre
|
|
response 62 of 150:
|
Jul 25 18:38 UTC 2003 |
RE#58
Nature has grouped us into two diffrent sexes. It violates the laws of nature
to engage in sexual acts with those of the same sex.
|