|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 477 responses total. |
cyberpnk
|
|
response 375 of 477:
| 
Nov 4 18:46 UTC 1994 |
Is there room for a Vampire Prince?
|
wavestar
|
|
response 376 of 477:
|
Nov 4 23:31 UTC 1994 |
prince? that's royalty... only a few get royalty. Perhaps you could settle for
a lordship? An unliving Prince and a prince of the Damned, and a Prince of the
Canites have already been refused among fuz's closest friends....
|
selena
|
|
response 377 of 477:
|
Nov 8 17:07 UTC 1994 |
Salutations, your Majesty, and to the royal and noble members of His
Court! I wish to propose a title for myself, for consideration by your grand
wisdom. I would like to be known as "Enchantress of the Glimmering Smile".
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 378 of 477:
|
Nov 8 21:02 UTC 1994 |
I can live with a lordshpi. Perhaps I can be Load Malkavian?
|
selena
|
|
response 379 of 477:
|
Nov 9 15:01 UTC 1994 |
For cyberpnk's sake, I think you should title him "Lord Malkavian"
instead of "Load Malkavian", as he typed.
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 380 of 477:
|
Nov 10 22:16 UTC 1994 |
Oops. I Meant 'Lord Malkavian'. I wonder if Selena wants to be Lady Malkavian?
|
sidhe
|
|
response 381 of 477:
|
Nov 12 20:18 UTC 1994 |
May i suggest that cyberpnk be given his title, and selena be given
hers, and IF something should arise between them, that the necessary
adjustments be
made then? As for myself I do not NEED a title, but if you would wish, you
may call me by my actual title: Lord of the Seelie Court.
..
|
wavestar
|
|
response 382 of 477:
|
Nov 17 21:56 UTC 1994 |
Seelie? like the Faerie Court? Thou art High in rank indeed, Master Sidhe.
Selena: Wilt t thou enchant us then, with thy Glimmering smile? Lord Malkavian
Is quite agreeable, and any romances blossoming among the court members is
welcomed. Our king recently Got married, and Love is in the air! The
Enchantress issue may come up again, my dear lady, but, For right now, I
welcome you all to the court. Cyberpnk's title is grtanted, Selena's is in the
works.
|
sidhe
|
|
response 383 of 477:
|
Nov 19 14:02 UTC 1994 |
I apologize if i have mislead ye, wavestar. I am not THE (High) Lord of the
Seelie Court, merely a minor Lord of it. Again, I apoligise if this has led
any to believe that I am the High Elderitch, for i am not. I am the Lord of
Autumn's Night, for my full title.
|
wavestar
|
|
response 384 of 477:
|
Nov 19 21:27 UTC 1994 |
Oh well, I had hopes I was actually meeting the High Lord of Seelie Court. If
you wish to be known as Lord of Autumn's night here,, I think think the title
is acceptable. You are hereby granted that tiltle.
|
md
|
|
response 385 of 477:
|
Nov 21 14:55 UTC 1994 |
I wish to request the title of Arbiter of Absolute Taste.
It would be the responsibility of the Arbiter to preview
every work of art - all poems, paintings, sculptures,
works of fiction, musical compositions, architectural
plans, and so on. If the Arbiter approved, the work of
art would be presented to the public. If the arbiter
disapproved, the creator of the work of art would be
put to death immediately.
|
selena
|
|
response 386 of 477:
|
Nov 21 17:22 UTC 1994 |
Petronius, methinks you've been into my moonshine, again, poor silly!
Dragonette: what needest thou, to know whereof I speak, in terms of my being
an Enchantress? Please elucidate, as i am puzzled.
|
jwp
|
|
response 387 of 477:
|
Nov 21 20:46 UTC 1994 |
Ummm...Arbitrator of taste?...what planet do you telnet in from and how
bad is the lag?...no serioulsy I belive all of those things are free in
expression...it would royally piss off the freelancer order if someone had
censorship over art and poetry!
|
jltaylor
|
|
response 388 of 477:
|
Nov 22 02:36 UTC 1994 |
kill the censors...kill the censors
free expresion will never die
|
anne
|
|
response 389 of 477:
|
Nov 22 18:53 UTC 1994 |
cause if art and poetry and the like are censored- where will it end?
Someday perchance religion would be censored...
|
jwp
|
|
response 390 of 477:
|
Nov 22 19:15 UTC 1994 |
Lady wavestar...I ask you to please grant selena her title...I can vouch
for her...
|
wavestar
|
|
response 391 of 477:
|
Nov 22 22:11 UTC 1994 |
or can otherwise prove she is worthy of said tilte, Lord JWP, Her title is
Granted by my order.
duties. Please request another.
|
jwp
|
|
response 392 of 477:
|
Nov 23 01:33 UTC 1994 |
It seems to me part of that respoce was lost could you repeat that?
|
md
|
|
response 393 of 477:
|
Nov 23 20:07 UTC 1994 |
You know, I don't offer my services as Arbiter to just anyone.
Are you quite sure you don't want to grant me the title?
|
jwp
|
|
response 394 of 477:
|
Nov 23 20:11 UTC 1994 |
I think the blessed order would be quite mad if there was an arbitrator of
arts...
|
fuz
|
|
response 395 of 477:
|
Nov 25 18:24 UTC 1994 |
as both a monarch and a poor writer, im against the idea of an Arbiter of Good
Taste. welcomes all around!
|
cyberpnk
|
|
response 396 of 477:
|
Nov 26 18:25 UTC 1994 |
Lord Fuz! You have returned! This court has been longing for your company!
|
fuz
|
|
response 397 of 477:
|
Nov 26 22:15 UTC 1994 |
which company, fuzCourt or IMAGINATION Unltd.?
|
sidhe
|
|
response 398 of 477:
|
Nov 27 19:25 UTC 1994 |
Why, what it is that we missed, M'Lord, is noneother than the honor
of conversing with your regal presence! I should think that this would be
obvious, but i must recall that you possess a perfect sense of modesty, as
well as a fine sense of humor.
|
brighn
|
|
response 399 of 477:
|
Nov 28 03:37 UTC 1994 |
<TBG is once again licking the regal boots>
|
