|
Grex > Agora56 > #84: Newspaper in Denmark prints cartoon pics of Mohammed | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 432 responses total. |
richard
|
|
response 354 of 432:
| 
Feb 20 20:46 UTC 2006 |
And I ask mcnally and other, if the blue ribbon thing did not require a
member vote, which was grex taking a political stand, why should this?
|
kingjon
|
|
response 355 of 432:
|
Feb 20 20:54 UTC 2006 |
Re #353: Article 3, Section c: "The BOD shall make decisions related to system
maintenance, staff responsibilities and appointments, and issues related to
daily business." This is none of these.
Whether to post something on the web page is (IMO) up to the webmaster, but his
decision can be made for him by a member vote.
|
richard
|
|
response 356 of 432:
|
Feb 20 20:56 UTC 2006 |
I think that by placing the blue ribbon on grex's webpage without a
member vote, grex set a precedent that these decisions on matters
related to taking political stands, can be made by the board and do not
require a member vote. Which is not to say a member vote isn't a good
thing. Just that the board is authorized by the membership to make
these decisions themselves.
|
myopicislam
|
|
response 357 of 432:
|
Feb 20 21:20 UTC 2006 |
http://grex.cyberspace.org/~myopicislam/
|
mcnally
|
|
response 358 of 432:
|
Feb 20 21:28 UTC 2006 |
> And I ask mcnally and other, if the blue ribbon thing did not require a
> member vote, which was grex taking a political stand, why should this?
Because it rather undermines the claim that you are making (that Grex
supports free speech) when you haven't even asked the membership of
Grex whether it agrees with your symbolic gesture.
If no consensus was sought at the time of the blue ribbon campaign then
the same was true of that gesture, but that doesn't make it a better idea
the second time around.
|
jep
|
|
response 359 of 432:
|
Feb 20 22:36 UTC 2006 |
The Board does not have any authority to take political stands which
claim to represent my position. I don't vote for Grex Board members in
order to have someone else to make political statements for me. I do
so in order that someone will be in charge of Grex, to provide a
community forum where I can discuss things with other people who like
to discuss things.
Grex doesn't need to have an editorial voice. It's a place to express
one's editorial voice. Grex is an electronic barbershop, not a
newspaper.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 360 of 432:
|
Feb 20 23:58 UTC 2006 |
Is that the twisted analogy you used to have your items deleted?
|
jep
|
|
response 361 of 432:
|
Feb 21 00:02 UTC 2006 |
Nope. You know, you should have discussed that two years ago when it
was relevant. It's not now, or in this item.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 362 of 432:
|
Feb 21 00:24 UTC 2006 |
It was a natural question given how false your analogy was. Barbershops
don't archive the conversations that occur there.
|
jep
|
|
response 363 of 432:
|
Feb 21 00:43 UTC 2006 |
No, it was a very strained question, obviously inappropriate, obviously
discussed at extremely great length when it was meaningful two years
ago, and obviously intended as a mean spirited attack from out of the
blue. If you want to be a jerk, cyklone, at least own up to what you
are doing. Be an honest jerk.
|
naftee
|
|
response 364 of 432:
|
Feb 21 00:48 UTC 2006 |
Since the items are still (to my knowledge) available somewhere, the
discussion is as valid now as it was two years ago.
Some people don't forgive others for selfish acts, jep. you have to be
prepared to accept the consequences of your decisions years after the fact.
otherwise you're going to be calling an awful lot of people 'jerks'.
|
scholar
|
|
response 365 of 432:
|
Feb 21 01:08 UTC 2006 |
I've heard rumours that the vandalized items will be reposted someday soon.
|
twenex
|
|
response 366 of 432:
|
Feb 21 01:15 UTC 2006 |
I haven't been paying much attention to this item, but now I'd like to make
a point.
I think those of you who are panicking about "the reaction in the Muslim
world" are missing the point. Much of the Muslim world is in the THIRD World,
a region well known for revolutions, counter-revolutions, violent protests,
and a general state of anarchy, irrespective of the religion of the people
concerned. In contrast, most of the Muslims in the /developed/ world, along
with citizens professing other religions, has been calm (there was a rally
in London at which some Muslim protesters demanded the beheading of the
cartoonists, but they were almost universally condemned for this by the rest
of the British Muslim community).
|
tod
|
|
response 367 of 432:
|
Feb 21 03:13 UTC 2006 |
All I have to say is that it was the Taliban that demolished the 1500 year
old Buddhists monuments and you didn't hear a squeak from the Muslim world.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 368 of 432:
|
Feb 21 03:54 UTC 2006 |
Jep, you used twisted "logic" to justify deleting items. Now you use a twisted
analogy of barbershops and grex. If you want to define me as a "jerk" for
pointing out your continued inability to think clearly, be my guest.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 369 of 432:
|
Feb 21 04:19 UTC 2006 |
re #366: who's panicking?
re #360, 368: I think jep's position, as expressed in #359 is quite
clear, furthermore totally agree with him that Cyberspace Communications'
raison d'etre is to maintain Grex for public use, not to speak out on
political issues or crusade for free speech.
Here's what he wrote, again:
> The Board does not have any authority to take political stands which
> claim to represent my position. I don't vote for Grex Board members in
> order to have someone else to make political statements for me. I do
> so in order that someone will be in charge of Grex, to provide a
> community forum where I can discuss things with other people who like
> to discuss things.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 370 of 432:
|
Feb 21 09:21 UTC 2006 |
re367: i recall more protest from archeologists than from
the buddhist community.
|
fudge
|
|
response 371 of 432:
|
Feb 21 10:54 UTC 2006 |
re#367: that's because their issue is indeed with representation of figures
of worship - they don't give a damn about respecting other religions (which
are fundamentally evil to them), the fuss they're making is only about their
rule being broken. what they expect to achieve by staging worldwide
violent demonstrations because of a stupid cartoon published by one newspaper
is beyond me, but the only likely outcome I can foresee is the proliferation
of material ridiculing islam.
|
jep
|
|
response 372 of 432:
|
Feb 21 14:06 UTC 2006 |
re resp:368: Do you disagree with my statement about the Board (or
staff) creating a Grex position on the question of anti-Muslim
cartoons? Or aren't you able to comprehend that part of the discussion
in this item? I can try to state it in simpler words if you're having
trouble following what I wrote.
|
naftee
|
|
response 373 of 432:
|
Feb 21 14:25 UTC 2006 |
GreX should create a barbershop quartet
|
rcurl
|
|
response 374 of 432:
|
Feb 21 16:07 UTC 2006 |
There is no reason for the Board to create a Grex position on anti-Muslim
cartoons if no one on the Board thinks tht Grex should take a position on a
matter that is not directly relevant to Grex. There are many much more
significant domestic freedom of speech issues that affect Grex and its
purposes than this Muslim dustup.
But even then, there is a perfectly good procedure in place to raise the issue
with the membership, by proposing a resolution and having it put to a vote.
Arguments for and against can be made at that time.
|
other
|
|
response 375 of 432:
|
Feb 21 16:55 UTC 2006 |
Get this straight. The ONLY organizations that have a _responsibility_
to republish the cartoons are press organizations whose role is to
inform their customers about the causes and nature of this issue. To
republish them in the absence of such a responsibility, even simply as a
symbolic statement supporting the freedom of speech and of the press, is
irresponsible and offensive and reflective of a narrow and parochial
mindset.
There are lots of ways to protest innapropriate limits on freedom of
speech (that includes the freedom to offend), but to offend on principle
and without reservation solely to make the point that being offensive i
that particular way is acceptable to you is ignorant in the extreme,
especially if you would admonish someone for similarly offending you and
your beliefs just to show that they can or have the right to.
I don't think it was at all apropriate of the Jyllens-Posten to solicit
and publish these cartoons originally, but I do think it entirely
appropriate once the response gathered steam that other news agencies
republished them to inform their constituencies about the conflict and
its causes. Grex has no such role or responsibility, and for Grex to
republish these cartoons would be an act of unvarnished affrontery which
serves no justifiable real or symbolic purpose.
|
nharmon
|
|
response 376 of 432:
|
Feb 21 17:13 UTC 2006 |
Can Grex maintain its charity status while also officially bashing
religions?
|
tod
|
|
response 377 of 432:
|
Feb 21 17:17 UTC 2006 |
Grex has charity status?
|
nharmon
|
|
response 378 of 432:
|
Feb 21 17:23 UTC 2006 |
Isn't that how donations are tax deductible?
|