|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 393 responses total. |
jp2
|
|
response 348 of 393:
| 
Jan 15 17:02 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
flem
|
|
response 349 of 393:
|
Jan 15 17:05 UTC 2004 |
From the rapidity of the shitstorm which gathered when valerie deleted
the baby items, I'd say it's pretty disingenuous, if not downright
dishonest, ofyou to claim that you didnt' know deleting your items would
produce controversy.
|
jp2
|
|
response 350 of 393:
|
Jan 15 17:08 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 351 of 393:
|
Jan 15 18:46 UTC 2004 |
What I was saying John is you took a big chance you'd be able to have
everyone's responses killed.. You simply wanted it done in a real hurry.
You demanded it be happen before any discussion took place, even among
staff and board. Clearly, the discussion of the propriety of this
censorship wasn't as important as getting the items killed.
So now it's being discussed. It may end up you won't be able to censor
everyone comments. Opps.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 352 of 393:
|
Jan 15 18:47 UTC 2004 |
I'm beginning to think jep is not deliberately lying in the typical sense of
the word. What I do find disturbing is that he seems to be showing a
cluelessness very similar to what some of us were discussing in his divorce
item. In other words, I'm seeing more denial and rationalization than lying.
|
jp2
|
|
response 353 of 393:
|
Jan 15 18:55 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 354 of 393:
|
Jan 15 19:03 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 355 of 393:
|
Jan 15 20:34 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 356 of 393:
|
Jan 15 20:36 UTC 2004 |
It was unnecessary.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 357 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:07 UTC 2004 |
What was in there?
|
jp2
|
|
response 358 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:12 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 359 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:19 UTC 2004 |
Wow. Guess we really *do* have to be careful what we discuss here, if
it's likely to be passed on to the police.
|
willcome
|
|
response 360 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:20 UTC 2004 |
Huh?!
|
mary
|
|
response 361 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:33 UTC 2004 |
Yep. But then I decided how discussion of Jep's divorce didn't
belong in the item discussing his divorce item. Hope that makes
sense. Anyhow, it didn't belong here. There are already too many
hurt feelings.
|
gull
|
|
response 362 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:58 UTC 2004 |
I am curious, now, if there's any truth to the rumors that mary also
gave a copy to jep's ex-wife. I'd dismissed those comments as
hypothetical until reading resp:358.
|
jp2
|
|
response 363 of 393:
|
Jan 15 21:59 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
tod
|
|
response 364 of 393:
|
Jan 15 22:19 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 365 of 393:
|
Jan 15 22:43 UTC 2004 |
See, now you're making it up as you go along. ;-)
No hardcopy was given to anyone. Remember, this is an
open access public system.
|
tod
|
|
response 366 of 393:
|
Jan 15 22:48 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
mary
|
|
response 367 of 393:
|
Jan 15 23:01 UTC 2004 |
Nope. Nope.
At least not because of anything I did.
|
scott
|
|
response 368 of 393:
|
Jan 15 23:35 UTC 2004 |
Re 365:
Well, your scribbling of your responses makes your denial difficult to
confirm. I think jp2 was making a point about scribbled responses...
|
jp2
|
|
response 369 of 393:
|
Jan 16 01:10 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 370 of 393:
|
Jan 16 02:40 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 371 of 393:
|
Jan 16 03:24 UTC 2004 |
re #359: That's already happened on mnet, and the user was actually visited
by the police. She laughed it off, according to her posts. Another
difference between mnet and grex I guess.
re #370: Is it time to invoke Godwin's Law now?
|
naftee
|
|
response 372 of 393:
|
Jan 16 03:44 UTC 2004 |
If you think Irving is a Nazi. However I don't believe Hitler had a website
as slick as Irving's.
|