|
Grex > Coop13 > #75: Member Initative: Restore the Murdered Items | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 424 responses total. |
jep
|
|
response 344 of 424:
| 
Feb 3 16:22 UTC 2004 |
From M-Net:
#7 of 7 by James Howard (jp2) on Tue Feb 3 11:14:55 2004:
I think the vote ends on Saturday. Regardless, be warned now, under any
circumstance but A passing and B failing, the initiative for A will be
re-entered and Grex will continue voting on it every ten days until
they get it right.
|
jp2
|
|
response 345 of 424:
|
Feb 3 16:38 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
dpc
|
|
response 346 of 424:
|
Feb 3 16:47 UTC 2004 |
Sorry, I don't think so. 8-) There is no provision for repeated
voting on something that fails.
I voted yes on A and no on B, FWIW.
|
jp2
|
|
response 347 of 424:
|
Feb 3 16:56 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
krj
|
|
response 348 of 424:
|
Feb 3 19:19 UTC 2004 |
The censored log issue sat for a long time -- over a year? -- before
being revisited. Maybe it'll be necessary to have a bylaw change to
dictate a waiting period before revisiting an issue that's been voted
on.
|
other
|
|
response 349 of 424:
|
Feb 3 19:56 UTC 2004 |
There is a by-law amendment on the table right now, which I would
consider amending specifically to allow the voteadm to exclude system-
abusive, repetitive proposals.
|
jp2
|
|
response 350 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:05 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
krj
|
|
response 351 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:17 UTC 2004 |
Sure thing, Diebold!
|
other
|
|
response 352 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:21 UTC 2004 |
For the record, the response jp2 wants removed quotes a posting he made
on m-net [#7 of 7 by James Howard (jp2) on Tue Feb 3 11:14:55 2004]
declaring that his initiative, should it fail, will be re-entered
repeatedly (every ten days) "until they get it right."
|
jp2
|
|
response 353 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:30 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
other
|
|
response 354 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:40 UTC 2004 |
By the way, Jamie, can you prove that the text posted in resp:344 was
originally written by and is owned by you? Pointing to its origination
on m-net alone would not constitute proof without some verification
that the account jp2 on m-net is owned by you, which cannot be verified
by grex staff unless they also have sysadmin privileges on m-net, or
unless the m-net sysadmin vouches for the accuracy of any origin-
specific log data...
|
albaugh
|
|
response 355 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:45 UTC 2004 |
Quoting someone, with full attribution, isn't going to be deemed copyright
infringement to begin with.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 356 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:49 UTC 2004 |
Re. 354: According to 352, you already know jp2 owns it.
|
jp2
|
|
response 357 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:54 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 358 of 424:
|
Feb 3 20:59 UTC 2004 |
Prove it...
|
gelinas
|
|
response 359 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:06 UTC 2004 |
jp2 really do *not* want this resolved in his favour. If it is, then
there is another can of worms opened: how to track down all of the other
copies of his words that exist on the Internet. Of course, it is not _his_
problem to track down all the copies of the baby-diary and divorce items,
but it becomes attractive to some to try.
While parody is protected, I wonder how much was directly quoted in m-net's
parody conference, and what relation the quotations bear to the totality
of the original work.
This really isn't something you want to start, jp2.
|
jp2
|
|
response 360 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:24 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jp2
|
|
response 361 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:31 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 362 of 424:
|
Feb 3 21:54 UTC 2004 |
(this is coop, not agora).
|
jp2
|
|
response 363 of 424:
|
Feb 4 11:07 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
naftee
|
|
response 364 of 424:
|
Feb 4 14:16 UTC 2004 |
HEY DIDSOMEONE METION THE DMCA?
|
remmers
|
|
response 365 of 424:
|
Feb 4 17:12 UTC 2004 |
As long as we're mentioning things, somebody should mention "fair
use", which I believe #344 to be.
|
jp2
|
|
response 366 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jep
|
|
response 367 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:32 UTC 2004 |
It's a paragraph, Jamie.
It was quoted directly, in context, from a public site, and with the
intention of conveying information relevant to an ongoing policy
discussion.
But by all means, take legal action if you find it necessary. Please.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 368 of 424:
|
Feb 4 18:50 UTC 2004 |
What about the fair use rights of people who posted in your item?
|