You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   315-339   340-364   365-389   390-405   
 
Author Message
25 new of 405 responses total.
wlevak
response 340 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 31 04:35 UTC 2004

IT appears to be down again
wlevak
response 341 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 31 05:26 UTC 2004

It's working normally now.  Did someone fix it, or did it do it by itself?
keesan
response 342 of 405: Mark Unseen   May 31 16:35 UTC 2004

I am getting frozen connections again, when telnetting from grex to elsewhere.
mcnally
response 343 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 07:38 UTC 2004

  lag, drop, lag, drop, drop, drop.

  (my experience tonight trying to post two responses in agora..)
twenex
response 344 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 15:07 UTC 2004

An update on progress (or lack thereof) with the replacement dsl modem might
be nice. It's starting to get worse again.
rcurl
response 345 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 17:40 UTC 2004

Just got dumped from my telnet connection. Viva dialins....
gull
response 346 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 19:42 UTC 2004

Seems to have been down since this morning...at least, the two times I've
tried to SSH in, it's timed out.

How's the new modem coming?
aruba
response 347 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 20:49 UTC 2004

Grex is still off the net.
tpryan
response 348 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 21:53 UTC 2004

Login      Name               TTY  Idle  Login Time   Location   Work Phone
amishel  anton mishel          p5   17d  May 15 02:31
newuser  The Newuser Program   p0   30d  Apr 24 13:51
sgsg     sg                    p6   32d  Apr 30 08:12
tpryan   Tim P. Ryan          *qe        Jun  1 17:50
tuks     stalin                p2    2d  May 29 20:12
viju     Johnson               p8   14d  May 18 02:28

        Looks like I'm the piker with the short conversation.
twenex
response 349 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 1 22:02 UTC 2004

It's back!!!
richard
response 350 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 17:35 UTC 2004

Last night for a period of time grex's url's were pointed elsewhere.
www.cyberspace.org brought up a search engine.  www.grex.org brought up a
different search engine.  In the past when grex went off the 'net, you
would get a "page not found" or some other error.  If somebody at grex's
isp changed its urls to pointers to point elsewhere, does that indicate
more than just a hardware problem?  
aruba
response 351 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 19:03 UTC 2004

That sounds very weird, Richard.  Are you sure your browser isn't infected
with adware?  Sometimes adware will redirect your browserto where it wants
to go.  What browser are you using, and what search engine did you get?
twenex
response 352 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 19:08 UTC 2004

That sounds like the most plausible explanation to me, too.
scott
response 353 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 20:54 UTC 2004

That or a localized DNS problem.  A couple weeks ago I absolutely could not
get a connection to a well-established website for a couple days.  Couldn't
even send mail; it would bounce.
richard
response 354 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 03:22 UTC 2004

well I did have some evilware that snuck in and installed itself on my hard
drive. But thats a side effect of doing a lot of websurfing.  A lot of those
pop up ads on ad driven sites come loaded with hidden downloads.  But I've
never had that particular issue at other times when grex was off the web. 
Its an annoying bad habit of my computer that its supposed to notify me if
anything is being downloaded, but things still get by it and install
themselves anyway from time to time
aruba
response 355 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 04:09 UTC 2004

My roommate had the same thing happen to him recently.  He had to boot up in
safe mode and delete some files, before they had a chance to run. 
spyware.com was helpful.
bru
response 356 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 14:53 UTC 2004

My ISP is now checking mail, and they have blocked 4 mails perportedly from
Microsoft about critical security upgrades that they say have virus attached.
Is that normal?
gelinas
response 357 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 15:12 UTC 2004

Roughly speaking, yes, it is normal, bru.
gregb
response 358 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 15:16 UTC 2004

No it's not.  If there are security updates, you'll receive them via IE,
either through Auto Notification or by clicking Update Windows in the
Tools menu.
mcnally
response 359 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 16:19 UTC 2004

  Conflicting answers above can be explained as a confusion between:
  "yes, it's normal to block them", and "no, it's not normal to receive them."
tpryan
response 360 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 16:30 UTC 2004

        Normal to get them?  Well, I was getting them on a regular
basis, until Earthlink learned they used less resources to block 
the virus attached.
        Using Update Windows is the better method for finding about
security updates.
pgreen
response 361 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 17:58 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 362 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 18:30 UTC 2004

Right; Microsoft does not distribute its security updates by e-mail.
Several viruses DO distribute themselves by e-mail by masquerading as
Microsoft security updates.

So blocking them is normal, and receiving them is normal.  Even applying
them is also normal.  However, applying them is not desirable.
pgreen
response 363 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 18:55 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

salad
response 364 of 405: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 21:09 UTC 2004

Indeed, why not ^
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   315-339   340-364   365-389   390-405   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss