You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   9-33   34-58   59-83   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-258   259-283   284-290       
 
Author Message
25 new of 290 responses total.
keesan
response 34 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 01:00 UTC 2006

You can buy lights at the hardware store that come only when they sense
motion, only if it is dark out.  The settings are adjustable, and they can
be set to stay on for different durations.  You can also run your bathroom
fan on a dehumidistat and/or timer, so it comes on only when it is humid and
stops when it is dry, or you turn a mechanical knob to start a mechanical
timer that will run up to 15 minutes, or an hour.  None of this is
whole-house.  It is good for your health to pull shades up and down.
tod
response 35 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 20 01:55 UTC 2006

 It is good for your health to pull shades up and down.
Not if you are a former President in the 24 series
ric
response 36 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 21 04:34 UTC 2006

My telephone service is provided through my cable modem thanks to a wireless
router.  Perhaps someday, my phones will support 802.11g or some similar
wireless protocol, and then I won't have to have the phones wired into the
wall outlets (though they still need power)
marcvh
response 37 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:01 UTC 2006

Apropos of this, last night my WiFi network stopped working.  First it
got really slow and unresponsible, and then it stopped functioning at
all.  Even when my laptop and my WAP were only two feet apart, they
couldn't see each other and nothing would work.

That happens every once in a while; when it does, nothing seems to fix
it, but a few hours later or the next day it's working fine.  I also
wasn't able to detect any of the other WiFi networks in my neighborhood
(there are 5 of them within range) which suggests some kind of systemic
interference rather than a local equipment problem.

I'm told by others this is far from uncommon; not sure if it might be
caused by sunspots, atmospheric conditions, a neighbor using a
poorly-shielded microwave, or what.  But it happens from time to time.
A hard-wired LAN will probably have availability of four or five nines,
while WiFi seems to be somewhere between one and two nines.
nharmon
response 38 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:08 UTC 2006

My wifi connection is quite reliable. In fact, I have never had it go
out. A lot of times it comes down to the quality of your equipment. A
coworker reports a similiar problem with his d-link wireless router. He
has to cycle the power in order for it to start working again.

I do agree that wired networks are many times more reliable.
twenex
response 39 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:16 UTC 2006

I also find that power-cycling the router helps. You might want to try that,
Marc.
rcurl
response 40 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:22 UTC 2006

When I first installed my WiFi system there would be some blackouts 
(byteouts?) and I called Comcast. On a couple of occasions they were 
announcing that their system was down. For many months now the system has 
been absolutely stable. While I do have a wired LAN using the WiFi 
connection to cable, I don't use the LAN very often - mostly for backups 
and rarely to exchange files. So, at least for my use, the convenience of 
the WiFi is more important than the reliability of the LAN.
marcvh
response 41 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 17:35 UTC 2006

Yeah, my impression is that the D-Link stuff is crap.  I wouldn't buy that.

Sorry if I'm not being clear -- yes, I did power-cycle the WAP.  I also
tried rebooting the laptop, connecting to a different router, using a
different network card, and about a dozen other things, none of which
worked at all.  This was definitely not a failure of any single piece of
equipment.  I suppose if I were being thorough I could have tried other
devices that use the same frequency range, such as my cordless phone, to
see what they did.  Or maybe I could have asked my neighbors if any of
them is in a terrorist sleeper cell using Ham radio to communicate with
Peshawar.

It just happens every once in a while; fortunately it's just a slight
inconvenience since I can fall back to using wires, and it always goes
away the next day if you do nothing.
springne
response 42 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 18:15 UTC 2006

D Link is crap, Linksys is lesser crap.
mcnally
response 43 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 22 20:32 UTC 2006

 re #39:  I'm pretty sure Marc would've tried that in his trouble-shooting.
 re #38:  Many (at this point, probably most..) cordless phones use the same
 2.4Ghz frequency band as 802.11b and 802.11g and depending on the phone
 model cause varying degrees of interference.  If you have a really close
 neighbor with such a phone it may be that you have such outages whenever
 they're using the phone but don't tend to notice the 2-minute outages and
 only notice when they're on the phone for an extended period.
jep
response 44 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 02:36 UTC 2006

If D-Link and Linksys equipment are poor quality, what brands would you
recommend?  Is it the routers which aren't up to snuff, or the network
cards as well?
twenex
response 45 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 02:51 UTC 2006

I use Linksys and D-Link stuff and haven't had any more problems than peooke
I've heard using other brands.
nharmon
response 46 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 03:49 UTC 2006

I have a Linksys router, and connect to it using a linksys pcmcia card
on my laptop, and a microsoft PCI card on my PC. I also have an orinoko
pcmcia card for when I get the temporary urge to put linux on my laptop.
All three have not had problems.

This afternoon my desktop PC discovered a new wifi network in the
neighborhood. 
mcnally
response 47 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 03:49 UTC 2006

 I haven't used any D-Link equipment but the Linksys products are quite
 decent for what they are..  However, keep in mind that there's a bit of
 a difference between professional grade networking hardware and a wireless
 access point that you can buy at Meijer for $40 after rebate..

 I use Linksys at home and am mostly happy with it, though I have replaced
 the manufacturer-provided firmware image with an upgraded Linux-based 
 firmware from a company called Sveasoft.
twenex
response 48 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 04:17 UTC 2006

Re: #45. peooke=people. WEIRD typo.
tod
response 49 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 04:45 UTC 2006

re #37
Are you anywhere near the pipelines?  They might be doing WiFi blackouts.
rcurl
response 50 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 05:48 UTC 2006

Are your neighbors using open systems (with the SSID broadcast)? Why would
they do that? Or can you detect closed networks?
marcvh
response 51 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 05:58 UTC 2006

Nope.  I am within a few blocks of an electrical substation, which I
suppose could be involved in some way.  But really, on the frequency
ranges which are used for tons of different applications by tons of
different people, there's going to be problems once in a while.  Nothing
too surprising or exciting.

Not sure what the future of spectrum use for unlicensed devices like
this will look like.  There's been some increase in the spaces available;
2.4 GHz being the most popular, but some growth in 5 GHz space.  Heck, I
remember when Ricochet, which used the 900 MHz band to get network speeds
comperable to a dialup, seemed pretty cool.  Anyway, there are
incremental improvements in ways to use the spectrum efficiently, but
the demand is also exploding.  It seems reasonable to speculate that
there will come a point where we have wrung all the performance we can
out of the technology, but the demand continues to grow, particularly in
densely populated areas.
ric
response 52 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 13:58 UTC 2006

I don't think I've ever noticed my wifi go down.  Cable goes down sometimes
(not often) so we lose internet access (and phone service) but the wifi always
works.
keesan
response 53 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 16:44 UTC 2006

Should I link this to the do it yourself conference and if so, please remind
me how.
tod
response 54 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 17:25 UTC 2006

I' suspect a flaky router if you're losing signal for extended periods.
slynne
response 55 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 17:44 UTC 2006

resp:53 I believe that if you go to the do it yourself conference, you 
can link this simply by typing 'link agora 63'

marcvh
response 56 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 17:47 UTC 2006

I find it unlikely that my neighbors' routers and mine all are flaky and
all happened to flake out at the same time.  But I suppose it's possible
one of them is flaky and caused interference which masked the signals
from the others.

Re #55: the ironing is delicious
nharmon
response 57 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 17:57 UTC 2006

I agree with Marc that this does sound like some extreme interference.
You could always call the FCC and tell them there is some equipment
nearby that is interfering with your network. Who knows, they might have
plenty of spare time now that Howard Stern is off the air.
gull
response 58 of 290: Mark Unseen   Jan 23 19:46 UTC 2006

Re resp:8: Right now the cable companies seem to be using the switch to digital cable as a way to try to force people to pay more money for the same content. If it had price parity with analog cable I might be more tempted, but otherwise it just looks like another rate increase. I also haven't been terribly impressed with the demo HDTVs at places like Best Buy. Yeah, the picture is really sharp when there's nothing going on, but when there's much action on screen the JPEG blockies start to show up. Re resp:19: There are two problems with predictions like that. One is that they're solutions looking for problems. How many consumers have actually *asked* for their refrigerator to tell them when they're out of milk, or their toaster to tell their washing machine when they make toast so it can pre-configure itself to remove jelly stains? The other problem is that most people can't or won't deal with complex systems like that. Sure, it's possible to load all your DVDs into a central computer and watch them anywhere in the house, but the average consumer, who can't even program his VCR timer, isn't going to want to fuss with trying to figure out how to use it. Until it can be made easy and reliable, at least. There are horror stories of people who have bought "smart homes" and have never been able to get everything working right. Think about how often your computer doesn't behave properly. Now imagine the same unreliablity applied to your lights, heat, and garage door opener, and you have an idea of the problem. Re resp:31: Maybe the older X10 stuff was better. The stuff I've bought in the last ten years or so has all been unreliable junk. Re resp:57: The 2.4 GHz band that wireless network stuff operates on is unlicensed. The tradeoff with not having to have a license is the FCC won't help you if you have an interference problem -- they only care about interference to licensed services. If you look at the documentation for any given wireless device, you'll find this verbiage: "This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following conditions: (1) this device may not cause any harmful interference, and (2) this device must accept interference received, including interference which may cause undesired operation." The 2.4 GHz band is sort of a combination of the Wild West and a garbage dump. You may get interference from cordless phones, amateur radio operators, microwave ovens, and even weather radar. WiFi uses spread-spectrum technology to avoid most interference from other services, and it actually works pretty well, but the potential for problems is built in.
 0-24   9-33   34-58   59-83   84-108   109-133   134-158   159-183   184-208 
 209-233   234-258   259-283   284-290       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss