You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-357     
 
Author Message
25 new of 357 responses total.
jep
response 325 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 22:07 UTC 2004

I, of course, also voted yes on this proposal.

There is no compelling reason for the items to be restored.  They won't 
be any good to anyone.  There has been very little, if any, harm from 
them being deleted.  I don't think anyone would have ever noticed they 
were gone if I'd had the power to delete them on my own, unless I said 
something.  They were last written to two years ago.

On the other hand, having them gone has been considerably relieving to 
me, aside from the time, energy and stress of dealing with them again 
at all.

There were no tools for mass deleting one's own responses at the time 
that these items were removed.  I'm knowledgeable about Unix, but not a 
good scripter or programmer.  I could have gone through thousands of 
responses and deleted them one at a time, and hoped I didn't drawn 
attention to the items before I was done... that really wasn't 
practical.
cyklone
response 326 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 22:14 UTC 2004

Yes, but now that you've been promised a mechanism to delete your words, why
are you so hellbent on censoring the words of others?
albaugh
response 327 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 22:19 UTC 2004

Just vote NO!
remmers
response 328 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 29 23:02 UTC 2004

(I voted no.)
naftee
response 329 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 01:50 UTC 2004

Thank you, remmers and albaugh.
jep
response 330 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 02:23 UTC 2004

re resp:326: I have written at great length and with great patience 
about my request, my decision and my reasoning.  I don't think I have 
any more to say.
polytarp
response 331 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 02:29 UTC 2004

THEN SHUT THE FUCK UP< FATTY
mary
response 332 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 09:57 UTC 2004

I voted no.
witzbolt
response 333 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 10:17 UTC 2004

I voted "yes".
jep
response 334 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 16:02 UTC 2004

Thanks very much to all who have voted "yes" on my proposal.  I 
appreciate it very much.
keesan
response 335 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 16:48 UTC 2004

Aren't you supposed to be buying us all whisky if we even show up to vote?
tod
response 336 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:49 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jep
response 337 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 19:11 UTC 2004

Sindi, I didn't know you were a whiskey drinker.  Yes, I can supply 
Bushmill's to anyone who shows up at my home to vote.
tod
response 338 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 19:29 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 339 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 20:18 UTC 2004

Jep knows I am joking.  I drink water, juice, or milk, usually water.
If we show up at jep's home in the next month by bike I will drink whisky.
Or even water from the local swimming hole if we can crack the ice.
jep
response 340 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:16 UTC 2004

Todd, you are welcome at my house any time.
tod
response 341 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:58 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

va1erie
response 342 of 357: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 05:22 UTC 2004

If Va1erie were a member, it's clear how her vote would be cast.
dpc
response 343 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:49 UTC 2004

I voted no.
remmers
response 344 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:05 UTC 2004

The treasurer has informed me that the voter list is up to date.
With 51 out of 82 eligible members voting, the results are:

        yes     34
        no      17

The motion passes.
tod
response 345 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 18:36 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

ryan
response 346 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 19:09 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jep
response 347 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 22:03 UTC 2004

Thanks very much to the members of Grex for supporting my request.  I 
very much appreciate it.  I also very much regret the need I saw which 
caused me to make this request.

Thanks also to all of those who participated in the discussion and/or 
the vote.  I can only hope the animosity from the discussion will die 
down and that Grex can go back to being as pleasant for it's users as 
it has been for the rest of it's existence.
tod
response 348 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 22:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 349 of 357: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 23:30 UTC 2004

You're welcome!  Feel free to e-mail me if you feel I should keep quiet if
staff abuses someone/something and keeps quiet.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   300-324   325-349   350-357     
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss