You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   299-323   324-348   349-373   374-398   399-423   424 
 
Author Message
25 new of 424 responses total.
keesan
response 324 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 16:48 UTC 2004

People put election signs in their yards so that prospective neighbors will
know whether they fit in.  Jim's street has a lot of flags, relative to the
rest of his area of town (pro-war).  
gelinas
response 325 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:47 UTC 2004

(That is a different perspective on yard signs.)
tod
response 326 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:48 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gull
response 327 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:51 UTC 2004

I've been told it does.
tod
response 328 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 19:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gull
response 329 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:15 UTC 2004

That's the vibe I've gotten from listening to Bush...
tod
response 330 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 331 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 22:22 UTC 2004

No, he joined the Reserves and then skipped out on the meetings.
tod
response 332 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:30 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 333 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:52 UTC 2004

> Date: 29 Jan 2004 05:45:09 -0000
> From: valerie@unixmama.com
> To: xxxxxxxxxxxx@cyberspace.org
> Subject: a request  

> Hello.  I'm writing with a request that is very important to me.
> I deleted my online baby diary from Grex.  There is a vote that has
> just started, to undelete it, against my wishes.  Please, even if
> you haven't used Grex in a long time, I urge you to log in and vote   
>to leave the baby diary deleted.  The vote also includes John Perry's
> divorce diary, which I deleted at his request, and which he wishes
> to also stay deleted.  I encourage you to log in and vote to leave all
> these items deleted.  My baby diary items contain lots of personal
> information about me and my children that I no longer wish to be
> posted on the Internet.  Even if my items are restored without my
> postings, my baby diary items are still all about me and my children,
> and the other people's postings are full of my personal information
> that I no longer wish to have posted.
>
> Here are the details of what happened: Back in 1997, I started
> keeping an online baby diary on Grex, logging many personal details
> of pregnancy, the births of my children, and many details of raising
> them, and about my personal life.  I originally posted it because
> I thought people who hadn't experienced pregnancy and childbirth
> might be interested to read about these things.  I figured that
> since it was located in a back corner of Grex, the only people who      
> would wade through my baby diary were people who were interested
> enough in parenting to wade through hundreds of postings about messy
> diapers and other topics of interest only to people who were truly
> interested in parenting issues, and also to people who were very
> patient friends of mine who wanted to keep up with my life.
>
> A few weeks ago, I discovered that a parody of my baby diary had
> been running on M-Net for the past 2 1/2 years, without my knowledge.
> (If you would like to see it, it's item 39 in the "Agora" conference
> on M-Net.)  Some of the postings there are funny, some are nasty.
> Finding the parody explained a lot about why the real baby diary
> had, in the past 2 1/2 years, acquired a number of people who didn't
> really seem to be interested in parenting, as you could tell by
> their postings.  They were visiting my baby diary to acquire
> material to parody on M-Net, or better yet to post my words verbatim
> and laugh about how outrageous or personal the information was.      
> The rules of the parody game in M-Net's Agora conference say that
> anything posted anywhere on Grex is open to parodying.  There is
> no way to opt out of being parodied.  That is, if you post anything
> on Grex, the people in M-Net's Agora conference take it as an open
> invitation to parody you.  I wished to opt out.  So I deleted my
> baby diary.  I used my Grex staff access to do it, just as I would
> have done for any user of Grex who asked staff to delete an item that
> was full of his or her personal information that they no longer wanted
> to have online.
>
> When I deleted the baby diaries, someone started a discussion
> in the co-op conference, claiming that my deletion of the baby
> diaries was "root abuse".  User jp2 started a vote, this vote that
> I am writing to you about, to undelete the baby diaries.  His
> reasoning is that since there were other people's words in the baby
> diaries, he claims it was censorship for me to delete their words    
> without their permission.  I find this claim bizarre.  The information
> in those baby diaries is all about me and my children.  If someone
> else had posted my credit card numbers, it would clearly be appropriate
> to delete that posting, because it contained my personal information.
> Most of the postings in the baby diaries are likewise all about my
> personal information.  I no longer wish to have this personal
> information online.
>
> So, if you would log in to Grex and vote "no" on proposal "A",
> I would very much appreciate it.
>
> To vote, log in to Grex, and, type    !vote    from a menu, or
>    vote    from a shell prompt.  Then follow the menus from there.
>
> -Valerie                                                           
tod
response 334 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

naftee
response 335 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 00:27 UTC 2004

And she doesn't even mention my username.  I'm just a "someone".


What a bitch.


(btw Thanks, cyklone)
va1erie
response 336 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 05:21 UTC 2004

If Va1erie were a member, it's clear how her vote would go.
jaklumen
response 337 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 07:44 UTC 2004

resp:333 Again and again, the message seems to be-- cyberspace is 
pretty open, so be wary of posting personal information; people can and 
will exploit it.  Be knowledgable of how secure the forums are that you 
post to.  Can you trust the folks you're sharing information with?  And 
who might those folks be?

Of course, a lot of those ideas and questions seem moot... moot to be 
asked or applied, at least to that particular situation.  Yes, the 
issue at hand now is policy.  But that's just a matter of symptom... I 
think the concerns described above probably are matters of prevention.

Policies do guide decision-making.  But people have to put thought in 
those choices-- and should, each and every time.
naftee
response 338 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 31 19:51 UTC 2004

va1erie. heh
sarahlee
response 339 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 17:22 UTC 2004

I vote no to the restoration of deleted items or posts from tape.

I feel perfectly okay with the risks I take posting on Grex. One of the
risks is that the item could be deleted at any time, including all of my
posts. If I write something I particularly care for, it's my
responsibility to keep a copy of it. Not Grex's.
I also reserve the right to delete every post I ever made on Grex,
without regard to the "damage" that action would cause to the context of
other people's posts. 
I have no expectation that my posts on Grex are guaranteed against
anything, including deletion. Same with anything I write anywhere
online, unless I personally signed a contract giving me that guarantee. 
I posted a great deal in Valerie's baby diary and don't care one whit
that my posts there are gone. If that item is restored, with or without
her posts, I request my posts there be deleted.
tod
response 340 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 18:21 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

albaugh
response 341 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 19:59 UTC 2004

(sarahlee is not a member, BTW)
witzbolt
response 342 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 20:38 UTC 2004

i'm ejaculating on your tits.
naftee
response 343 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 2 21:52 UTC 2004

 !members >> fags.on.GreX
jep
response 344 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:22 UTC 2004

From M-Net:

#7 of 7 by James Howard (jp2) on Tue Feb 3 11:14:55 2004: 

I think the vote ends on Saturday.  Regardless, be warned now, under any
circumstance but A passing and B failing, the initiative for A will be
re-entered and Grex will continue voting on it every ten days until 
they get it right.
jp2
response 345 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:38 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

dpc
response 346 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:47 UTC 2004

Sorry, I don't think so.   8-)  There is no provision for repeated
voting on something that fails.

I voted yes on A and no on B, FWIW.
jp2
response 347 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 16:56 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

krj
response 348 of 424: Mark Unseen   Feb 3 19:19 UTC 2004

The censored log issue sat for a long time -- over a year? -- before 
being revisited.  Maybe it'll be necessary to have a bylaw change to 
dictate a waiting period before revisiting an issue that's been voted
on.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   299-323   324-348   349-373   374-398   399-423   424 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss