You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   296-320   321-333      
 
Author Message
13 new of 333 responses total.
keesan
response 321 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 01:22 UTC 2006

Today I have been getting mail progressively from June 9, June 8, June 7 and
now June 6.  I wondered why people had stopped writing.  Thanks again.
keesan
response 322 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 01:56 UTC 2006

In among the June 7 I just got a May 23 mail!  Rane was saying it took up to
12 days to get mail at grex, but this is about 21 days.  How does the mail
manage to get so bogged down?  Can exim be instructed to deliver the oldest
mails first instead of the newest ones?
steve
response 323 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 04:09 UTC 2006

   There are some old pieces of mail in the queue which I think will now
get liberated.  Exim is likely going to get a little more tweaking
before this is all over.  But mails are moving fairly quickly now.
It took about 1.5 minutes for mail to get from msu.edu to grex, and
faster than that the other way around.
rcurl
response 324 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 15 07:57 UTC 2006

Wow! The e-mail dam has burst. But, thanks!
gull
response 325 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 16 23:57 UTC 2006

Re resp:317: I don't have the permissions to see what's 
in /var/spool/exim here, but on my own machine I see four directories.

db/ - This only has four files in it, on my system.  I think it 
contains Exim's retry database.

input/ - This holds the message queue.  If I remember right there are 
two files per message, one containing just the headers and one 
containing the message body.  If you've got a lot of crap in there, you 
need to figure out why messages are stacking up in the queue.  A common 
culprit is undeliverable bounce messages, which Exim "freezes" and 
keeps in the queue until the time set in the 
"ignore_bounce_errors_after" option is reached.  You want this time 
*short* because undeliverable bounces are almost always the worthless 
backscatter from spam runs.  Right now Grex has this set to 2 days, 
which I'd say is on the long side.

msglog/ - This holds log information about messages that are in 
transit.  The files here (one per message) are normally deleted once 
the message is delivered, although sometimes they get missed and 
linger.  Again, if this is full, it might be because you have a long 
queue.  This information is duplicated in the main log, so it's safe to 
say "message_logs=false" in the beginning part of exim.conf and delete 
the contents of this directory.  This should help the inode problem.

scan/ - This is a temporary directory where messages are unpacked while 
they're scanned by external software like ClamAV or SpamAssassin.  I 
don't think Grex is running either of those programs, so there 
shouldn't be anything in there.
mcnally
response 326 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 00:18 UTC 2006

 The msglog directory has tens, or possibly hundreds, of thousands of
 files, some of them dating back to 2004.

 I presume those aren't from messages Grex is still attempting to deliver..
gull
response 327 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 00:39 UTC 2006

Remember that Grex crashed a lot, for a while.  Most likely Exim never 
got to delete those files due to a crash, or perhaps there's a bug that 
causes them to occasionally escape deletion.

Like I said, they're safe to delete, and if you set 
"message_logs=false" you shouldn't have to deal with them anymore.  
They're really only useful for troubleshooting delivery problems, and 
the same info can be gleaned from the other logs with a bit of effort.
cross
response 328 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 00:18 UTC 2006

This response has been erased.

gull
response 329 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 20:35 UTC 2006

I'm not arguing with that.  I've got four old message log files on my 
own small server, and I have no idea why.  Frankly, I think the whole 
individual-message-log thing is a misfeature that should be removed, or 
turned off by default.

UNIX software in general doesn't seem to clean up after itself very 
well.  If it did there wouldn't be a need for periodic /tmp cleaning 
scripts to get rid of old, stale lockfiles and the like.
eprom
response 330 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 21 23:43 UTC 2006

its officially summer
keesan
response 331 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 01:29 UTC 2006

I could not dial either number just now and connect - they both just rang.
naftee
response 332 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 02:10 UTC 2006

what !

m-net seems to be down :(
scholar
response 333 of 333: Mark Unseen   Jun 22 02:13 UTC 2006

 :(

plz fix
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   296-320   321-333      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss