You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   7-31   32-56   57-81   82-106   107-131   132-156   157-181   182-206 
 207-225          
 
Author Message
25 new of 225 responses total.
mary
response 32 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 18:02 UTC 2003

And then there are the retreats in Cancun.

Oops.

aruba
response 33 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 17 19:24 UTC 2003

I'd like to second the nominations of slynne, bhelliom, and krj.  I'm happy
Mary is running again, too.
janc
response 34 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 20 02:27 UTC 2003

Valerie and I generally spend 7pm to 8pm every night putting kids to bed.
It's fairly common for the process to go later than 8pm.  Because of this,
evening meetings are pretty difficult to attend, and attending meetings is
pretty much the sole duty of a board member.  I could probably find a way
to deal with this, but I think there are plenty of people who can do the
job as well with less awkwardness.  So for now, I think I'll stick with just
being on staff.
asddsa
response 35 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 20 03:01 UTC 2003

Do you read excerpts from "The C Programming Language" to your kids?
bhelliom
response 36 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 20 14:41 UTC 2003

resp:24 - Thanks, Richard...I think.  We neither or us need a keeper,
though the strategy that you mentioned about reminders makes sense for
anyone that can't right things down.  :)

I'll take a couple of days to think on it.  Last winter was not the best
period of time for me, and I'm still in the process of reconstruction so
to speak.  While this wouldn't impact my ability to be on the board and
attend meetings, I still want to keep things in perspective and that
means taking this into consideration.  I'm also feeling a rather guilty
for my lack of precence on the system lately, and I'd need to reconcile
that with being on the board.  While I would increase my precence on the
system as a board member, grex itself and other users is why I primarily
want to be around.

So I'll take a couple of days, and post my decision then, if that is
acceptable to everyone.
remmers
response 37 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 20 15:29 UTC 2003

Sure, take what time you need.  The drop-dead deadline for accepting
a nomination isn't until November 30, in any case.
davel
response 38 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 13:29 UTC 2003

I'd nominate cross if he were near enough to attend board meetings.
I would also join in seconding a couple of those who haven't responded,
but what's needed is their response, not a second.  (Possibly they're not
reading coop?  Possibly this should be linked to agora?)
mynxcat
response 39 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 14:40 UTC 2003

I believe due to an amendment made some time last year, boardmembers 
can now call into the meetings. I don't know if the infrastructure is 
present at this time, but I guess now's a good time as any to put that 
amendment to work. 

If you're still upto nominating cross, davel, I'll second. (Do I have 
to be a member to second?)

I'd also nominate jp2, if he hadn't pre-empted me and gone ahead. Sure 
he'd be a pain in the posterior, but I believe he would be a real 
value addition to the board. 
cross
response 40 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 14:55 UTC 2003

I'm flattered, but I'm going to respectfully decline due to other time
commitments.  :-)
remmers
response 41 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 15:27 UTC 2003

Re #39:  No seconds are needed.  Self-nomination is allowed.  The only
thing you need to be a member for is to appear on the ballot.  (See #0,
where I said all this.)  Also, jp2 nominated himself already.
remmers
response 42 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 15:32 UTC 2003

Here's a list of everyone nominated so far who has not declined.
People who have accepted their nominations are indicated with a *.

          cmcgee
        * jp2
          kip
          glenda
        * mary
          tod
          bhelliom
          krj
          polygon
          slynne
remmers
response 43 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 15:33 UTC 2003

By the way, thanks to slynne for nominating me, but I'm going to decline.
Doesn't feel right.  Maybe in the future.  (I've served three full terms
in the past.)
glenda
response 44 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 16:35 UTC 2003

Glenda wil accept or decline as soon as she sees what her schedule will look
like.  My current schedule has me either in class or TA for a class every
evening until between 7 and 9.  I could not accept in good conscience if I
don't have some evenings free.
cross
response 45 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 17:15 UTC 2003

Regarding #41; Not for this election.  I nominated jp2, if I'm not mistaken.
Or maybe I just seconded him.

Hell, I don't remember.  my memory is clearly going.
mynxcat
response 46 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 17:31 UTC 2003

I think you niominated and he accepted. Or maybe not. Point is he was 
already nominated by the time I got round to it. That's why I said "he 
pre-empted me..."

Never mind. I'm hoping there is at least one non-local baord member. 
It would be interesting to see how it works out. But with just one non-
local candidate, that might not happen this year
slynne
response 47 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 21:05 UTC 2003

I will accept. However, I am not currently eligable to run as I am not 
a member. I am broke until tomorrow but will paypal my money then. 
remmers
response 48 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 22:35 UTC 2003

Not that it matters much, but jp2 nominated himself and cross seconded.
cross
response 49 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 23:15 UTC 2003

Actually, I think he nominated himself, and then I re-nominated him,
and then he accepted my nomination.  Not that it matters.
jp2
response 50 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 21 23:52 UTC 2003

This response has been erased.

mary
response 51 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 00:27 UTC 2003

Yeah, slynne!  Too cool.
remmers
response 52 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 00:47 UTC 2003

Re #50: I took your statement of intent as a self-nomination.  Of
course, it doesn't matter.
bhelliom
response 53 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 16:18 UTC 2003

I've decided to accept the nomination.  Don't worry, it's not the
headache talking...
aruba
response 54 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 16:51 UTC 2003

Great!
bhelliom
response 55 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 17:57 UTC 2003

About the headache not talking, or about the nomination? ;)
flem
response 56 of 225: Mark Unseen   Oct 22 18:02 UTC 2003

If your headache can speak and post in conferences, you should probably lie
down or something.  :)
 0-24   7-31   32-56   57-81   82-106   107-131   132-156   157-181   182-206 
 207-225          
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss