|
Grex > Agora56 > #31: It is time to get the hell OUT of Iraq! | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 133 responses total. |
drew
|
|
response 32 of 133:
| 
Jan 5 22:05 UTC 2006 |
Well, we're certainly not getting any oil out of it.
|
happyboy
|
|
response 33 of 133:
|
Jan 5 22:47 UTC 2006 |
well, you aren't anyhoo...i'll bet cheney & crew are cleanin up
however.
|
tod
|
|
response 34 of 133:
|
Jan 5 22:54 UTC 2006 |
re #30
Are you engaged in a discussion with me about the existing military presence
in Iraq or are you happier just spouting off about a dead horse we've all
beaten to death?
|
richard
|
|
response 35 of 133:
|
Jan 5 23:09 UTC 2006 |
re #34 Its not a dead horse so long as we're still over there in this
mess. Maybe you are ready to completely forget the reasons that got us
over there, as if they don't matter anymore, but I am not.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 36 of 133:
|
Jan 5 23:20 UTC 2006 |
Tod - and the administration - are trying to make us believe that how we
got into the war is now irelevant and should be forgotten. They don't
apply that to other crimes, felonies for example, which the law does *not*
forget "in order to get on" with things. Why should the administration's
crimes in getting us into the war go unpunished?
|
tod
|
|
response 37 of 133:
|
Jan 6 00:27 UTC 2006 |
*snort*
I'm just not interested in rehashing what is already known. I agree the WMD
chicken little stuff was treasonous. What it has to do with reasonable minds
deciding on a withdrawal from Iraq is miniscule. If you want to be kneejerk
about withdrawal as our Prez was about invasion then you're welcome to stoop
to that level of politics. I would hope that those who replace or reverse
GW Bush's regime would at least show some responsibility and forethought.
|
klg
|
|
response 38 of 133:
|
Jan 6 03:35 UTC 2006 |
Richard LIES. Or maybe he was ASLEEP when the news showed VIDEO of
CONGRESSMEN and SENATORS calling SADDAM an IMMINENT THREAT. SOMETHING
that the president, himself, REFUSED TO DO.
But I HOPE Richard will KEEP IT UP, because the American people know
that people like HIM can't be TRUSTED with their SAFETY and will
continue to VOTE for REPUBLICANS.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 39 of 133:
|
Jan 6 03:51 UTC 2006 |
"Trusted with SAFETY." Nice attempt to inject your false GOP meme. Close,
but no cigar. Now go lie down by your bowl.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 40 of 133:
|
Jan 6 05:29 UTC 2006 |
KLG wants to forget that the then at least somewhat trusted President of the
United States was taken at his word and believed by people that had no other
source of the truth. That hardly excuses Bush and his cabal for lying.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 41 of 133:
|
Jan 6 09:53 UTC 2006 |
I guess masturbationi doesn't work. He's got to beat on other people
now.
|
scholar
|
|
response 42 of 133:
|
Jan 6 11:44 UTC 2006 |
Speaking of which, I'm going to purchase a FLESHLIGHT, which is a piece of
material in a flashlight-looking case that's apparently one of the most
pleasurable things one can find to stick their penis into.
I'm slightly worried about my parents being home when it gets here, but I
figure it'll probably arrive while they're at work.
If not, I guess I can just say it's something for my computer.
Or just not say something at all, though that would arouse suspicion, which,
I'll tell you, isn't quite what I'm trying to arouse here.
And what if my parents are here but get to the door first?!
Oh dear!
But, uh!
That's not very likely to happen, and won't be an absolute disaster even if
it does happen (customs label sez JOKE ITEM, though the FORUMS part of the
Fleshlight company's website includes at least one story of that being changed
to MASSAGE DEVICE by customs).
|
klg
|
|
response 43 of 133:
|
Jan 6 11:44 UTC 2006 |
Curl, are you pleading ignorance or insanity?
The tapes clearly show congressional leaders going far beyond what the
President said. And they show congressional leaders saying the same
things under the Clinton administration.
Don't you think it is time you showed at least a modicum of honesty??
I don't really care, though. It's people such as yourself who
demonstrate why nobody trusts the Democrats anymore. Keep up the good
work (at least through the next election).
|
cyklone
|
|
response 44 of 133:
|
Jan 6 13:42 UTC 2006 |
"Don't you think it is time you showed at least a modicum of honesty??"
That's rich, coming from you.
|
rcurl
|
|
response 45 of 133:
|
Jan 6 15:22 UTC 2006 |
KLG just proves what Abe said: you can fool all the people some of the time.
But we've wised up.
|
tod
|
|
response 46 of 133:
|
Jan 6 18:43 UTC 2006 |
re #42
Are you going to "pack it" even when you do NOT go camping?
|
scholar
|
|
response 47 of 133:
|
Jan 6 21:25 UTC 2006 |
Whoa!
You guys can track my Fleshlight at fedex.com with tracking number
732107442466!
The estimated delivery time is 5:00 PM?! Uh oh! That's right when my parents
will be around! Hopefully that's JUST an estimate?!
|
tod
|
|
response 48 of 133:
|
Jan 6 22:06 UTC 2006 |
Does your dad look like Eugene Levy?
|
scholar
|
|
response 49 of 133:
|
Jan 6 22:08 UTC 2006 |
no. :(
|
rcurl
|
|
response 50 of 133:
|
Jan 6 23:32 UTC 2006 |
Is a Fleshlight AC or DC?
|
scholar
|
|
response 51 of 133:
|
Jan 6 23:51 UTC 2006 |
AHAHAHAHA< IT"S ID AHAHAHA AS IN ID LUBE AHAHBAHA.
|
gull
|
|
response 52 of 133:
|
Jan 7 03:50 UTC 2006 |
It looks like many of the troop deaths have been needless, too:
'A secret Pentagon study, The New York Times reports on Saturday, has
found that as many as 80 percent of the marines who have been killed in
Iraq from wounds to the upper body could have survived if they had had
extra body armor.
'"Such armor has been available since 2003," writes Michael Moss, "but
until recently the Pentagon has largely declined to supply it to troops
despite calls from the field for additional protection, according to
military officials."'
(http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_conte
nt_id
=1001807591)
But then, they volunteered for this, right? I guess that makes their
lives cheap, in the eyes of some.
It seems to me that the question now isn't whether we can establish a
democracy in Iraq, but instead how long we want to stay involved in a
civil war between two rival factions of Islam.
|
richard
|
|
response 53 of 133:
|
Jan 7 16:46 UTC 2006 |
gull said:
"It seems to me that the question now isn't whether we can establish a
democracy in Iraq, but instead how long we want to stay involved in a
civil war between two rival factions of Islam."
Just like Vietnam, where the question became by the early seventies,
not whether we could establish/maintain a democracy in south vietnam,
but how long we wanted to stay involved in a bitter civil war, where
once side was never going to accept our presence there.
|
naftee
|
|
response 54 of 133:
|
Jan 7 20:42 UTC 2006 |
whoa ! scholar !
haven't you heard of fleshlights before ?!
i'm sure they were mentioned on m-net somewhere.
|
scholar
|
|
response 55 of 133:
|
Jan 7 22:52 UTC 2006 |
whoa, oh no!
my fleshight is being held at the border so they can collect 'duties and/or
taxes'!
i hope no-one tries it out!
|
naftee
|
|
response 56 of 133:
|
Jan 8 00:40 UTC 2006 |
what !
i hope the duties aren't expensive
|