You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   286-310   311-335   336-360   361-385   386-388   
 
Author Message
25 new of 388 responses total.
aruba
response 311 of 388: Mark Unseen   May 30 21:52 UTC 2002

No guesses here for a week.
brighn
response 312 of 388: Mark Unseen   May 31 16:53 UTC 2002

cacophony
aruba
response 313 of 388: Mark Unseen   May 31 18:20 UTC 2002

cacophony 0,3
blaise
response 314 of 388: Mark Unseen   May 31 23:14 UTC 2002

employee
blaise
response 315 of 388: Mark Unseen   May 31 23:16 UTC 2002

Grr.  Make that "employees".
aruba
response 316 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 13:10 UTC 2002

employees 1,3
brighn
response 317 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 2 15:56 UTC 2002

referrals
aruba
response 318 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 3 18:32 UTC 2002

referrals 1,0
gelinas
response 319 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 4 03:07 UTC 2002

calumnies
brighn
response 320 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 4 17:17 UTC 2002

clustered
aruba
response 321 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 5 16:25 UTC 2002

calumnies 1,2
clustered 0,1

What's a calumny?
gelinas
response 322 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 04:59 UTC 2002

A false accusation of wrongdoing, usually malicious.

illuminer
brighn
response 323 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 15:39 UTC 2002

Liar! You made that up, Joe, just to get out of a real definition!

amorality
aruba
response 324 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 6 18:03 UTC 2002

illuminer 0,2
amorality 0,3
gelinas
response 325 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 7 04:54 UTC 2002

 :)
aruba
response 326 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 16:00 UTC 2002

No action here for a while.
brighn
response 327 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 17 16:58 UTC 2002

barbarian
aruba
response 328 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 18 13:44 UTC 2002

barbarian  0,1
brighn
response 329 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 17:53 UTC 2002

Since it's been 48 hours without a guess, I can guess again (see #0).
 
moneybags
aruba
response 330 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 19:36 UTC 2002

moneybags  2,2
brighn
response 331 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 20:03 UTC 2002

Hm. Either you've made a mistake in the scoring or I've made a mistake in the
analysis. (Probably the latter. ;} Ah well, I've got a few days to figure it
out.)
brighn
response 332 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 19 20:40 UTC 2002

No, I checked again, and there seems to be a scoring error somewhere.
allusions 1,3
If we loo amorality, illuminer, cacophony, the only possible correctly
positioned letters in allusions are the s's. That means we can rule out all
the other letters in referrals and clustered: acdeflrtu
From faltering>______ing 0 1, we know there's at most one of i,n
From calumnies>____mni_s 1 2, we know there's an m
From barbarian 0 1, we know there's no b
From allusions>____sions 1 3, we know there are two s's and an o
From amorality>_mo___i_y 0 3, we know there's either an i or a y (not both)
(From calumnies, we know there's either an i or an n (not both), so we know
there's no g)
moneybags, there's no e, b, g, a; there's one m, o, s. That leaves n and y.
So we know there's either an n or a y (not both)
It's impossible to have exactly one of (i,n), one of (n,y) and one of (i,y)
at the same time.
aruba
response 333 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 03:21 UTC 2002

Ah, I do see one that I scored wrong.  It should have been

faltering 0,2

Sorry about that.  The program I wrote for the other games doesn't work for
this one, so I have been scoring by hand.  I will try to write a new program
soon, and check all the scoring.
brighn
response 334 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 03:59 UTC 2002

'sok, I botched two or three scores once in this game...
brighn
response 335 of 388: Mark Unseen   Jun 20 16:47 UTC 2002

someone else guess, dagnabbit... 
If it helps people, this is what I think I've figured out as far as the letter
set:
None of: abcdeflnrtuy
One i
One or more gmop
Two or more s
Either an h or a second o
Unknown: jkqvwxz (haven't been used)
Last letter is s
 
That means the letter set is gimopss!? where ! is o or h and ? is in
ghkmpqsvwxz (h only if there are two h's):
gimopssog
gimopssok
gimopssom
gimopssop
gimopssoq
gimopssos
gimopssov
gimopssow
gimopssox
gimopssoz
gimopsshg
gimopsshh
gimopsshk
gimopsshm
gimopsshp
gimopsshq
gimopsshs
gimopsshv
gimopsshw
gimopsshx
gimopsshz

That's assuming my analysis is correct and Mark's scoring is correct. =}
So... somebody guess! =}
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   286-310   311-335   336-360   361-385   386-388   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss