You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   285-309   310-334   335-359   360-384   385-409   410-424 
 
Author Message
25 new of 424 responses total.
jp2
response 310 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 01:27 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

jmsaul
response 311 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 01:32 UTC 2004

I read it.
naftee
response 312 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 01:49 UTC 2004

Yeah it's about as polite as you can get.
aruba
response 313 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 03:27 UTC 2004

I voted "no" on this proposal.
mary
response 314 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 09:56 UTC 2004

I voted yes.
witzbolt
response 315 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 10:16 UTC 2004

I voted "no".
jp2
response 316 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 13:14 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 317 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 13:49 UTC 2004

(It's a form of campaigning, jp2.)
jp2
response 318 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 13:51 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 319 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 14:01 UTC 2004

Glad to be of help. :)
davel
response 320 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 14:03 UTC 2004

Actually, if you go back and look, it's not in the least uncommon for people
to announce how they are voting or have voted.
gull
response 321 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 14:44 UTC 2004

I'll sometimes announce how I intend to vote, but I rarely announce how
I *have* voted.  And I always reserve the right to change my mind.
scott
response 322 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 15:17 UTC 2004

I've seen people announce their vote on previous elections/initiatives.

I voted "no" on this.
jep
response 323 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 16:01 UTC 2004

I don't announce my vote for candidates for Board seats, or endorse 
candidates.  I don't have any similar reservations about proposals, 
though.
keesan
response 324 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 16:48 UTC 2004

People put election signs in their yards so that prospective neighbors will
know whether they fit in.  Jim's street has a lot of flags, relative to the
rest of his area of town (pro-war).  
gelinas
response 325 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:47 UTC 2004

(That is a different perspective on yard signs.)
tod
response 326 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:48 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gull
response 327 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 18:51 UTC 2004

I've been told it does.
tod
response 328 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 19:10 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gull
response 329 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:15 UTC 2004

That's the vibe I've gotten from listening to Bush...
tod
response 330 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 21:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

gelinas
response 331 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 22:22 UTC 2004

No, he joined the Reserves and then skipped out on the meetings.
tod
response 332 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:30 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

cyklone
response 333 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:52 UTC 2004

> Date: 29 Jan 2004 05:45:09 -0000
> From: valerie@unixmama.com
> To: xxxxxxxxxxxx@cyberspace.org
> Subject: a request  

> Hello.  I'm writing with a request that is very important to me.
> I deleted my online baby diary from Grex.  There is a vote that has
> just started, to undelete it, against my wishes.  Please, even if
> you haven't used Grex in a long time, I urge you to log in and vote   
>to leave the baby diary deleted.  The vote also includes John Perry's
> divorce diary, which I deleted at his request, and which he wishes
> to also stay deleted.  I encourage you to log in and vote to leave all
> these items deleted.  My baby diary items contain lots of personal
> information about me and my children that I no longer wish to be
> posted on the Internet.  Even if my items are restored without my
> postings, my baby diary items are still all about me and my children,
> and the other people's postings are full of my personal information
> that I no longer wish to have posted.
>
> Here are the details of what happened: Back in 1997, I started
> keeping an online baby diary on Grex, logging many personal details
> of pregnancy, the births of my children, and many details of raising
> them, and about my personal life.  I originally posted it because
> I thought people who hadn't experienced pregnancy and childbirth
> might be interested to read about these things.  I figured that
> since it was located in a back corner of Grex, the only people who      
> would wade through my baby diary were people who were interested
> enough in parenting to wade through hundreds of postings about messy
> diapers and other topics of interest only to people who were truly
> interested in parenting issues, and also to people who were very
> patient friends of mine who wanted to keep up with my life.
>
> A few weeks ago, I discovered that a parody of my baby diary had
> been running on M-Net for the past 2 1/2 years, without my knowledge.
> (If you would like to see it, it's item 39 in the "Agora" conference
> on M-Net.)  Some of the postings there are funny, some are nasty.
> Finding the parody explained a lot about why the real baby diary
> had, in the past 2 1/2 years, acquired a number of people who didn't
> really seem to be interested in parenting, as you could tell by
> their postings.  They were visiting my baby diary to acquire
> material to parody on M-Net, or better yet to post my words verbatim
> and laugh about how outrageous or personal the information was.      
> The rules of the parody game in M-Net's Agora conference say that
> anything posted anywhere on Grex is open to parodying.  There is
> no way to opt out of being parodied.  That is, if you post anything
> on Grex, the people in M-Net's Agora conference take it as an open
> invitation to parody you.  I wished to opt out.  So I deleted my
> baby diary.  I used my Grex staff access to do it, just as I would
> have done for any user of Grex who asked staff to delete an item that
> was full of his or her personal information that they no longer wanted
> to have online.
>
> When I deleted the baby diaries, someone started a discussion
> in the co-op conference, claiming that my deletion of the baby
> diaries was "root abuse".  User jp2 started a vote, this vote that
> I am writing to you about, to undelete the baby diaries.  His
> reasoning is that since there were other people's words in the baby
> diaries, he claims it was censorship for me to delete their words    
> without their permission.  I find this claim bizarre.  The information
> in those baby diaries is all about me and my children.  If someone
> else had posted my credit card numbers, it would clearly be appropriate
> to delete that posting, because it contained my personal information.
> Most of the postings in the baby diaries are likewise all about my
> personal information.  I no longer wish to have this personal
> information online.
>
> So, if you would log in to Grex and vote "no" on proposal "A",
> I would very much appreciate it.
>
> To vote, log in to Grex, and, type    !vote    from a menu, or
>    vote    from a shell prompt.  Then follow the menus from there.
>
> -Valerie                                                           
tod
response 334 of 424: Mark Unseen   Jan 30 23:57 UTC 2004

This response has been erased.

 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   275-299   285-309   310-334   335-359   360-384   385-409   410-424 
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss