|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 348 responses total. |
senna
|
|
response 309 of 348:
| 
Sep 15 00:00 UTC 1999 |
MATRIX ON DVD? WHERE ARE MY SHOES?
I am serious closing agora *now* and buying this.
|
omni
|
|
response 310 of 348:
|
Sep 15 05:56 UTC 1999 |
Don't forget about Uncle Albert.
|
bdh1
|
|
response 311 of 348:
|
Sep 15 07:04 UTC 1999 |
View hidden response.
|
jazz
|
|
response 312 of 348:
|
Sep 15 18:53 UTC 1999 |
Got Matrix?
I also loved "It's all too much", which is a masterpiece of
odered-seeming chaos, and appears only in _Yellow Submarine_ and it's
soundtrack, insofar as I've seen.
|
richard
|
|
response 313 of 348:
|
Sep 15 22:20 UTC 1999 |
Its been reported of course that Keanu Reeves has signed to film not one
but two Matrix sequels back to back next year. They are to be filmed late
this year at the same time with the thought (and this is an interesting
idea) to release both Matrix II and III at the same time. This way
theater owners can play with your minds by not telling you which movie you
are seeing until you are in the theater, or they can switch the endings
around.
|
remmers
|
|
response 314 of 348:
|
Sep 16 01:53 UTC 1999 |
Hm, I will probably stay home so that they can't play with my money.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 315 of 348:
|
Sep 16 02:42 UTC 1999 |
Robert Zemeckis did something like that for the filming of
"Back to the Future" II and III (filmed them at the same time
and then released them almost simultaneously..)
|
senna
|
|
response 316 of 348:
|
Sep 16 03:17 UTC 1999 |
Not for another week. However, I had some computer shopping which that
prompted me to do.
|
aruba
|
|
response 317 of 348:
|
Sep 16 05:51 UTC 1999 |
Re #315: There were about 6 months between the release dates of BTF II and
III (11/22/89 and 5/25/90, according to the IMDB).
|
charcat
|
|
response 318 of 348:
|
Sep 20 06:11 UTC 1999 |
my copy of yellow sub. came in the mail to my door from amazon :) the sound
os great, good surround sound, oh, the pictures were good too :)
,
|
md
|
|
response 319 of 348:
|
Sep 20 13:46 UTC 1999 |
MICKEY BLUE EYES (C) - A hearty laugh or two, but
that's about all, despite the nice cast. The
story and pacing don't sustain your interest. The
directing seemed off the mark in many places: thirty
minutes in, it suddenly dawns on you what the movie's
been trying, clumsily, to make think this or that
character is supposed to be like. Hugh Grant is not
at his best.
200 CIGARETTES (B) - Something I read or heard put
me off about this movie when it was showing in the
theaters. It definitely has its moments, though, if
not its audience. It resembles a '90s teen party
flick in some ways -- think Can't Hardly Wait --
but the characters are mostly early '80s 20-somethings.
Several separate stories intertwine and converge.
Funny in places, touching in places, some stories work,
others fail. It's one of those movies you keep on
recasting it in your head, which is not a good sign.
|
otaking
|
|
response 320 of 348:
|
Sep 20 15:57 UTC 1999 |
ZARDOZ (C-) - I only rate this bad movie this high because it was a fun bad
movie.The plot was very confusing at times. Sean Connery probably regretted
starring in this one. Then again, maybe he liked running around in a red
loincloth throughout the whole film.
|
flem
|
|
response 321 of 348:
|
Sep 20 17:40 UTC 1999 |
re resp:267 I had an amusing few seconds, thinking you were saying
that Philip Glass was stung to death by bees in a former life. It
would explain a lot. :)
|
other
|
|
response 322 of 348:
|
Sep 21 00:18 UTC 1999 |
i loved zardoz. great late-night swill!
|
bdh1
|
|
response 323 of 348:
|
Sep 21 05:45 UTC 1999 |
re#320&322: Yeah. _Zardoz_ was way too kewl. And if you ever thought
about it rather meaningful as well. I especially liked the use of the
7th symphony as well as other classical music in the score.
|
kevco
|
|
response 324 of 348:
|
Sep 21 14:58 UTC 1999 |
Ugh. My friend has Zardoz on video and he loves it. We watched it one
night after the bar. Even with a mild buzz I can't say I enjoyed it.
And I usually would go for that sorta thing.
|
cassia
|
|
response 325 of 348:
|
Sep 21 17:41 UTC 1999 |
I think that Zardoz is not really a movie to enjoy,
but something more like a rite of passage.
Since we are talking of such old films, am I the only
person on earth who LIKED "Hudson Hawk" and "Big Times
in Little China"?
|
mcnally
|
|
response 326 of 348:
|
Sep 21 17:57 UTC 1999 |
No..
|
flem
|
|
response 327 of 348:
|
Sep 21 18:16 UTC 1999 |
When I saw Hudson Hawk for the first time, in the theaters, I didn't
like it at all. I saw most of it again recently on late night cable,
and loved it.
|
aruba
|
|
response 328 of 348:
|
Sep 21 19:20 UTC 1999 |
That's "Big Trouble in Little China", and it's become one of my all-time
favorite movies. "Now I'm gonna tell you about an accident, and I don't wanna
hear 'Act of God'."
|
mooncat
|
|
response 329 of 348:
|
Sep 21 19:46 UTC 1999 |
Cassia- you're not alone. I liked "Hudson Hawk" when I saw it in the
theater, and I really really like "Big Trouble in Little China."
Although, in the last big fight scene- try counting how many knives
Kurt Russell's character pulls out of his boot... It's amusing.
|
otaking
|
|
response 330 of 348:
|
Sep 21 19:51 UTC 1999 |
I liked Hudson Hawk when I watched it with a group of friends. As bad as it
was, Richard Grant played the role he was born to play.
I love "Big Trouble in Little China" and watch it whenever it's on. I just
love how the movie plays with the macho hero stereotype. Too bad they never
made the sequel.
|
cconroy
|
|
response 331 of 348:
|
Sep 21 20:54 UTC 1999 |
Just saw "Strange Days" for the first time. (It came out in '95, and I
had meant to see it then but never got around to it.) *Very* cool.
Great story, with action, sci-fi, suspense and a little bit of romance
all rolled into one. The ending was a little predictable, but by that
point I had become so engrossed in the story that it didn't matter.
It takes place roughly three months from now, during the last two days
of 1999, which makes it all the more realistic. It's certainly worth
renting, and I wouldn't have felt at all disappointed had I paid to see
it in a theater.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 332 of 348:
|
Sep 21 22:09 UTC 1999 |
I would agree that "Strange Days" is a good movie. Realistic, though?
Perhaps in comparison to "1984" or "Space: 1999", or other specifically
time-stamped future scenarios.. Our world is substantially less
screwed up than the one portrayed in the movie..
|
otaking
|
|
response 333 of 348:
|
Sep 22 12:37 UTC 1999 |
Yeah, and those Sony Discmans that record our memories will be out any day
now.
"Space: 1999" did get one thing right. We're very dependent on computers to
the point that a lot of people would be afraid to work without them. It hasn't
reached the point that when a computer says it requires a human decision,
there's a collective thought of "We're screwed!" I've known some people who
kind of forget that not everyone has e-mail though. :)
|
