|
Grex > Cinema > #68: Grex goes to the movies - The Summer Movies Review Item |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 18 new of 323 responses total. |
gelinas
|
|
response 306 of 323:
| 
Sep 15 02:23 UTC 2004 |
On Morning Edition today, one of the stories was on film restoration. 'Twas
noted that Star Wars was so popular that so many copies were made from the
negative that the original is now unusable. There is so much dirt and so
many scratches on _every_ frame that restoration is impossible.
|
twenex
|
|
response 307 of 323:
|
Sep 15 09:15 UTC 2004 |
Oy.
|
gregb
|
|
response 308 of 323:
|
Sep 15 14:11 UTC 2004 |
That's bull. From what I've seen on Bravo and other channels, the
original is used only to create a master copy which is used to make
distributed copies. Also, if restoration was impossible, that means the
DVD set coming out would be pretty crappy, and you know that's not gonna
happen.
|
gull
|
|
response 309 of 323:
|
Sep 15 17:33 UTC 2004 |
The DVD set is based on the 1997 release, not on the original one.
I still think Lucas has a good copy stashed away somewhere that he'll
trot out when it's financially convenient.
|
gregb
|
|
response 310 of 323:
|
Sep 16 16:19 UTC 2004 |
I doubt it. He was never really happy with the original outcome, which
is why he kept fiddling with it. To go back and re-release the
original would be like selling a draft version, in his eyes.
|
mcnally
|
|
response 311 of 323:
|
Sep 16 17:04 UTC 2004 |
re #310: Consensus opinion seems to be that when George Lucas's
artistic integrity has to duke it out with conflicting financial
incentives the artistic integrity rarely wins the fight. I believe
if there's enough money involved he'll overcome his perfectionist
streak.
|
richard
|
|
response 312 of 323:
|
Sep 17 03:45 UTC 2004 |
#311...McNally, that is ridiculous. George Lucas is a billionaire or close
to it. Why would he pick financial incentives over artistic integrity when
he doesn't need the money? He'll never be able to spend the money he has now
in his lifetime. His motivations are artistic, these films are his legacy
and he wants both trilogies to fit together so that future generations will
see the films as a WHOLE six film arc. So he tampers with the older films
to make them fit better. It makes artistic sense.
|
tpryan
|
|
response 313 of 323:
|
Sep 17 16:58 UTC 2004 |
George Lucas's ten year delay in making the first trilogy
was totally financial. The wife he divorced would have California
'community property' of the intellectual property.
Jedi mind trick. Palpatine could do it. After all, Anakin's
mom was the hottest *woman* (with a speaking part) in Episode I.
|
tod
|
|
response 314 of 323:
|
Sep 17 17:48 UTC 2004 |
Sporting wood at Star Wars is just *wrong*, Tim! ;)
|
richard
|
|
response 315 of 323:
|
Sep 18 01:28 UTC 2004 |
re #312...Lucas busy during the delay between the two trilogies. He was
producing the Indiana Jones trilogy. Spielberg directed those movies, but
Lucas was the producer in charge of everything and co-scriptwriter. Those
movies also made a ton of money. Funny he didn't stop working altogether
during his divorce isnt it?
|
tpryan
|
|
response 316 of 323:
|
Sep 18 21:23 UTC 2004 |
Anakin's mom was the only woman (with a speaking part) in Episode I.
(There was a child-queen that had a bigger part).
|
richard
|
|
response 317 of 323:
|
Sep 21 03:35 UTC 2004 |
Interesting, I just read a CNN article about the changes Lucas made
for the DVD editions of the first trilogy. It appears that in the
Empire Strikes Back, the Emperor is in fact (trivia question!) played
by a woman wearing an Emperor mask, with the voice being done by actor
Clive Revill. In Return of the Jedi of course, as well as in the
first trilogy, the Emperor is played by actor Ian McDiarmid. So now,
by the miracle of modern technology, McDiarmid now has the part in
Empire Strikes Back.
Lucas has also been tinkering with Jabba the Hut, and we get a new,
improved, and better Jabba.
|
gull
|
|
response 318 of 323:
|
Sep 21 13:27 UTC 2004 |
Sigh. I liked the original three movies in their original form. I
didn't think the gee-whiz special effects were an improvement.
|
anderyn
|
|
response 319 of 323:
|
Sep 21 14:04 UTC 2004 |
Personally, I would have preferred to get the movies as I saw them originally.
Why mess with success?
|
tpryan
|
|
response 320 of 323:
|
Sep 21 16:39 UTC 2004 |
The song that Sny Snootles does in Jabba's Hut is also different,
as is the Ewok Celebration.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 321 of 323:
|
Sep 21 18:22 UTC 2004 |
You might not have noticed, but the "victory song" from #3 (ROTJ), with the
Ewoks and all, which I did think was "funky", was replaced by a different song
when episodes 4-6 were re-released prior to episode 1.
|
gull
|
|
response 322 of 323:
|
Sep 21 20:02 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gull
|
|
response 323 of 323:
|
Sep 21 20:03 UTC 2004 |
Re resp:320: That was the worst change of all. It doesn't move the plot
along and the aliens are about as convincing as Muppets.
|