|
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 64 responses total. |
bhelliom
|
|
response 30 of 64:
| 
Jan 9 15:42 UTC 2004 |
Give a rest folks. You can discuss policy crap in the item for which it
was intended.
I personally do not think that scribbling everything that she has
written was a childish act. If I were to leave under such
circumstances, I'd want everything I'd written to be erased. She wants
a complete break from the syste, and I can't say I blame her. I doubt
she would have done so if she thought the system would be crippled and
it isn't. Beyond that I will make no assumptions. Having said that...
Have some class people, and leave her alone. She's gone, and she can't
answer for herself. Speculating about her motives is pointless.
|
mynxcat
|
|
response 31 of 64:
|
Jan 9 15:54 UTC 2004 |
I can see why she would erase all her posts.
|
other
|
|
response 32 of 64:
|
Jan 9 16:27 UTC 2004 |
Personally, I'd rather just erase all the posts of certain other
users...and then chain those other users into small holes in the
ground for a few years.
|
bhelliom
|
|
response 33 of 64:
|
Jan 9 17:33 UTC 2004 |
I'm seeing a scene from Monty Python now, Eric. You meanie!
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 34 of 64:
|
Jan 10 12:38 UTC 2004 |
resp:29 now you notice that I called you canucklehead. Lots of people
are canuckleheads. One's a friend of mine. Hmm, and I'm an ugly
American apparently. But you'll get over it =P
|
naftee
|
|
response 35 of 64:
|
Jan 10 17:07 UTC 2004 |
Just like you'll get over being a GreXer. Well, you might, but others won't.
|
tod
|
|
response 36 of 64:
|
Jan 10 23:47 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jaklumen
|
|
response 37 of 64:
|
Jan 11 09:56 UTC 2004 |
resp:35 Oh well.
|
tsty
|
|
response 38 of 64:
|
Jan 27 00:12 UTC 2004 |
having caught up, mostly, valerie stated her motives clearly
and concisely in #71.
she was no longer willing to leave open the opportunity for her
words to be abused here or elsewhere.
in her official capacity/capacities though, (and there are SOOOO many!)
valerie maintained her thoughts. very adult quality, that.
i will miss her.
|
albaugh
|
|
response 39 of 64:
|
Jan 27 16:33 UTC 2004 |
It was done childishly, and it was done to grex, which was not where the
dreaded parody items were created.
|
styles
|
|
response 40 of 64:
|
Jan 28 03:39 UTC 2004 |
yes, how dreaded. :(
|
sarahlee
|
|
response 41 of 64:
|
Feb 2 14:58 UTC 2004 |
Valerie has every right to do whatever she likes with her own words.
When I joined Grex, there was nothing saying I would have to give up
rights to my words on Grex. In the absence of such a contract, everyone
here owns what they write. If the majority of Grexers object, then the
rules need to be officially changed to reflect that.
In Valerie's place, I would have done the exact same thing.
|
tod
|
|
response 42 of 64:
|
Feb 2 18:18 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 43 of 64:
|
Feb 2 18:52 UTC 2004 |
re: 41
Do you realize you've just argued against yourself?
|
albaugh
|
|
response 44 of 64:
|
Feb 2 19:55 UTC 2004 |
I think the saying "but nobody doesn't like sarahlee" was just proven wrong...
|
jp2
|
|
response 45 of 64:
|
Feb 2 20:01 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
witzbolt
|
|
response 46 of 64:
|
Feb 2 20:37 UTC 2004 |
i'm ejaculating on your tits.
|
twinkie
|
|
response 47 of 64:
|
Feb 2 20:56 UTC 2004 |
Witzbolt, you're invited too. The Twinkie Conference could use more tits and
ejaculation.
|
witzbolt
|
|
response 48 of 64:
|
Feb 2 21:10 UTC 2004 |
You are an observer of this conference.You are an observer of this
conference.You are an observer of this conference.You are an observer of this
conference.You are an observer of this conference.You are an observer of this
conference.You are an observer of this conference.You are an observer of this
conference.You are an observer of this conference.You are an observer of this
conference.You are an observer of this conference.
|
naftee
|
|
response 49 of 64:
|
Feb 2 21:50 UTC 2004 |
jp2 is m-net's AMBER ASS ADORE
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 50 of 64:
|
Feb 4 23:51 UTC 2004 |
Re #41: The problem was that her items also contained other people's words.
Nobody here would have objected if she only removed her own words,
because as you say she has the right to do whatever she wants with
them.
However -- other people have the same rights she does, and we didn't
want our words deleted.
|
sarahlee
|
|
response 51 of 64:
|
Feb 7 21:20 UTC 2004 |
I'm saying that I may do whatever I wish with my own words. I'm also
saying the creator of an item may delete my words if s/he chooses to
delete the entire item. S/he may not selectively go through an item and
delete my posts, and no one else's, without my permission. I think that
is totally reasonable.
Aren't items deleted all the time, or at least with some regularity? Why
weren't they an issue?
|
naftee
|
|
response 52 of 64:
|
Feb 7 21:35 UTC 2004 |
Because they are usually deleted with a warning and with input from the public
|
boltwitz
|
|
response 53 of 64:
|
Feb 7 21:57 UTC 2004 |
And they aren't deleted regularly.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 54 of 64:
|
Feb 8 07:01 UTC 2004 |
Re #51: A lot of people don't agree that the person who starts an item
should have the right to delete the entire item. Once others have
posted, the item is a group work, and is not their property any
more.
And no, they aren't deleted with any regularity.
|