You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-3   3-27   28-52   53-77   78-102   103-127   128-152   153-177   178-202 
 203-227   228-252   253-277   278-293       
 
Author Message
25 new of 293 responses total.
mooncat
response 3 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 16:32 UTC 2002

Backtalk appears to be back up, for the moment, that's how I'm getting 
here.
carson
response 4 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 22:32 UTC 2002

re #1:  (I received a lot of spam today, period.  it was certainly odd
        to see so much directed at my Grex account; usually, at least
        of late, it's been one or two at a time.)
mdw
response 5 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 25 23:25 UTC 2002

The total amount of spam directed at grex seems to have gone *way* up
this week.  In a typical week (say, June 16-23), grex might reject
something like 765 pieces of suspected spam.  Since June 23, (ie, 2
days), grex has rejected 6578 pieces of suspected spam.  As best I can
tell, nearly all of the bounced mail really was spam.  It looked like a
rather large # of open relay hosts had been used, and delivery had been
attempted to more than 2000 grex mail addresses.  A number of different
kinds of spammers may be involved.  I don't have enough data to say
whether this was directed against grex, or is just a smaller part of
some larger spam deluge.
carson
response 6 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 01:51 UTC 2002

(ah.  thanks for the info, Marcus.)
cmcgee
response 7 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 02:10 UTC 2002

Yes, I've been getting spam this week in accounts that seldom have any at
all (here on Grex).
oval
response 8 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 05:11 UTC 2002

i've been bombarded the past few days as well at my panix account. :(

gull
response 9 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 13:12 UTC 2002

Oddly, I've seen a big drop-off in spam at work for no reason I can figure
out.
jhudson
response 10 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 17:14 UTC 2002

I got none. lol
danr
response 11 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 17:32 UTC 2002

resp:9. Spam seems to come and go, like the tides. Today, as you note, 
has been relatively spamless.
russ
response 12 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 22:06 UTC 2002

I had an inordinate amount of spam also, which I forwarded to uce.

I would propose that the federal death penalty be extended to spamming.
We'd be sure to clean out some of the sleazier elements of society. ;-)
eskarina
response 13 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 26 23:23 UTC 2002

I've never gotten any spam on grex.  But I got 20 more than usual on my MSU
account today.
other
response 14 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 05:12 UTC 2002

I receive almost nothing BUT spam on my grex account, so I've changed my 
.forward to uce and am using my upstageleft.net addresses instead.
eskarina
response 15 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 20:39 UTC 2002

did you give out your email address on grex?
carson
response 16 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 27 21:53 UTC 2002

(it's been a long time since I've given out my Grex address for anything,
but I figure spam will be one of the disadvantages of being at the top of
the password file.)  ;)
oval
response 17 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 00:29 UTC 2002

from hubbie:

"i just got some spam relayed through the Defense Intelligence Agency in
Wash DC ..

http://samspade.org/t/whois?a=11.64.149.229&server=magic

good job we (sic) are not fighting a war against spam ;)
"

other
response 18 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 05:19 UTC 2002

It's been a long while since I've given out my Grex address for anything, 
but it is still on my inactive (yet still present) angelfire.com account, 
and it appears on a lot of publicly accessible (and spiderable) Grex 
webpages due to my boardmembership.
oval
response 19 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 08:07 UTC 2002

just passing this along from the panix mod:

":Notice to users running Unix at home (elr) Thu Jun 27 21:09:40 2002

   Panix customers who run home versions of Unix should pay close attention
   to these recent security advisories:
   
     OpenSSH remote root compromise:
        http://www.openssh.org/txt/iss.adv
   
     BSD-based operating system resolver client buffer overflow:
        http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/803539 
   
     Apache chunking remote vulnerability:
           http://httpd.apache.org/info/security_bulletin_20020620.txt
   
   The resolver client buffer overflow is particularly scary, since it
   could theoretically be exploited through a firewall or on a machine
   that is not running any server programs.
"

janc
response 20 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 28 12:49 UTC 2002

I dunno.  If I wanted to send mail to Eric, I'd probably send it to 
other@grex.org even though he has never told me to use that addresss.
other
response 21 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jun 29 05:43 UTC 2002

Well, please send it to upstageleft.net instead.  Any address there will 
do.
jlamb
response 22 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 13:56 UTC 2002

to help prevent spam do not use your grex account to sign up for things on
the internet.  get a yahoo or hotmail account to sign up for these things.
these accounts are always targets of spam anyways!!!.
davel
response 23 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 14:37 UTC 2002

Hmm.  So to reduce the spam I get I should open another account where I'll
get even more spam?  
rcurl
response 24 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 15:37 UTC 2002

You might get *different* spam.....  8^}
mynxcat
response 25 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 15:38 UTC 2002

This response has been erased.

keesan
response 26 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 17:52 UTC 2002

I never ever get spam at my yahoo account or at my ISP, but plenty at grex.
I posted my grex address at my website and get lots of 'small business' spam
as well as the usual porno and mortgage.
catfish
response 27 of 293: Mark Unseen   Jul 1 17:57 UTC 2002

If you post your address at a website, you will always get spammed.
 0-3   3-27   28-52   53-77   78-102   103-127   128-152   153-177   178-202 
 203-227   228-252   253-277   278-293       
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss