You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-3   3-19         
 
Author Message
17 new of 19 responses total.
bdwyer
response 3 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 20:34 UTC 1999

I have to agree with response #1... I was a bit upset that more time wasn't
spent on the eyes, as the eyes (in my opnion) tell the most about somebody..
but after reading the last stanza....  I am left totaly satisfied after
reading this.. well done.
lumen
response 4 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 5 23:37 UTC 1999

resp:2 c'mon, cloud, you haven't answered my question :(
cloud
response 5 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 6 00:54 UTC 1999

Which question?  Why you didn't think of if before?  I thought the question
was rhetorical!  Besides, was it you're question or Julies?!  What's going
on?
lumen
response 6 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 8 22:19 UTC 1999

I was wondering if you were writing about your own face.
cloud
response 7 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 9 01:41 UTC 1999

Yup.  That's me, in all my imperfect glory.
lumen
response 8 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 06:29 UTC 1999

Cool!  Very cool.  I like it-- a poetic character study.
cloud
response 9 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 11 21:21 UTC 1999

Yeah, I got the idea after doing a self portrait... I'm thinking of scanning
a photo of myself and combining the two into a sort of mixed-media thing.
lumen
response 10 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 12 19:42 UTC 1999

That would be very hip.
toking
response 11 of 19: Mark Unseen   Feb 17 18:21 UTC 1999

(linked to the new poetry conf)
cloud
response 12 of 19: Mark Unseen   Mar 30 02:29 UTC 1999

Wow, I just got a message on my phone telling me that his poem had recieved
an Honorable Mention in a poetry contest... National Society of Arts and
Letters?  Something like that... out of fifty-eight poems entered.  It's the
first poetry competition I've ever won in--they want me to read it at this
reception thing.  I'm pretty geeked about it, even if it wasn't first place.

By the way, that mixed media thing I mentioned became item 65, "Forever Jung".
cloud
response 13 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 1 03:00 UTC 1999

Furthermore, it should be duly noted (as I just learned today) that Dan won
first place...  Tell me, mister modesty over there, what poem was it for?
orinoco
response 14 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 1 03:07 UTC 1999

<curses, he blew my cover>
It wz for "Suburban Sestina" - I'm not sure if I've posted it in here or not.
I actually didn't like the poem very much, so I was kind of annoyed that it
won, but I really can't complain... :)
arianna
response 15 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 1 21:41 UTC 1999

"kind of anno0yed that it won?"
dan, you're just *itching* to get cuffed over the head, aren't you?...d=
orinoco
response 16 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 2 18:18 UTC 1999

No, I mean I'm annoyed that _it_, rather than the _other_ poem I submitted,
won.  If I was going to win, I might as well've won with a poem I liked.  But
I'm glad that I won with something at least, so it's all good.  Don't hurt
me. :)
lumen
response 17 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 7 05:00 UTC 1999

Opinion of others does *not* determine the quality of a work.  
Seriously, in the arts in general, many great works have been passed 
over because there wasn't something there for the public to love.

That's the dilemma of the working artist-- should one work for the 
public to make money, or work for one's self?
cloud
response 18 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 11 23:31 UTC 1999

how about a little of both?
lumen
response 19 of 19: Mark Unseen   Apr 13 23:08 UTC 1999

That's generally the key to survival..
 0-3   3-19         
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss