response 3 of 7:

Oct 1 00:05 UTC 1999

I remember it.  I'm not sure if the material itself is different; it 
seems merely to be formatted a different way, to the best of my memory.
Perhaps brighn will point out how it's different?

resp:2 It has retained its shock..

response 5 of 7:

Oct 1 14:10 UTC 1999

Here's the "erotic" part of the original (from item #74):
 
 This things will I remember:
 Sensations of love.
 The sweetness of your perfume.
 The taste of your skin, warm and comforting,
 as you wrapped your arms around me.
 The depth of your eyes,
 and the smooth swell of your breast
 beneath the cool silk
 that brushed against me as we slept.
 The musk of your sex upon my lips,
 your moans, rising from a lilting whisper
 to a crescendo of ecstacy
 that echoed in the night.
 The strength of your muscles,
 your thighs clenched tight around my waist
 as I thrust into you.
  
I'm in a writing group right now, and the critique there was that I was being
too direct and overt... that I should try having just a series of
interconnected images and sensations. That's how it was changed.

response 7 of 7:

Oct 4 20:38 UTC 1999

I disagree.  To me, the series appears to break the flow of the style.