|
Grex > Coop13 > #75: Member Initative: Restore the Murdered Items | |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 424 responses total. |
albaugh
|
|
response 297 of 424:
| 
Jan 29 19:43 UTC 2004 |
Even though I'm not excited about this whole affair, I guess I recommend a
"Yes" vote on this proposal. That would ostensibly restore things to where
they were before the "unauthorized" item deletions took place. I'm sorry that
staff will have to spend time on this should it pass, but that is not the
fault of the membership - the fault lies elsewhere.
|
jp2
|
|
response 298 of 424:
|
Jan 29 20:06 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 299 of 424:
|
Jan 29 20:13 UTC 2004 |
I voted no on this proposal.
|
jep
|
|
response 300 of 424:
|
Jan 29 21:09 UTC 2004 |
I definitely don't agree with jp2 that the Grex staff has any contempt
for the users. I've never seen any indication that any of the users
feel that way -- until jp2 said it.
Like cmcgee, I voted against this proposal.
|
jp2
|
|
response 301 of 424:
|
Jan 29 21:25 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cmcgee
|
|
response 302 of 424:
|
Jan 29 21:26 UTC 2004 |
Logic and precedent are not the only criteria for making decisions. One of
my favorte "Bill of Rights" lists is in a book on independent thinking.
VIII You have the right to be illogical in making decisions.
A common way for people to manipulate others is by claiming that you cannot
do anything illogical. They try to force you to go against your own values,
which may place a higher priority on relationships and feelings, by insisting
that you must be "logical". Logic and precident are simply -one- way to
make good decisions.
|
polytarp
|
|
response 303 of 424:
|
Jan 29 21:37 UTC 2004 |
ROckon, McGEe
|
jp2
|
|
response 304 of 424:
|
Jan 29 22:04 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 305 of 424:
|
Jan 29 22:13 UTC 2004 |
"Personal favors for favored persons"
|
remmers
|
|
response 306 of 424:
|
Jan 29 23:01 UTC 2004 |
I voted in favor of this.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 307 of 424:
|
Jan 29 23:05 UTC 2004 |
May I draw your attention response 124, above?
|
gelinas
|
|
response 308 of 424:
|
Jan 29 23:19 UTC 2004 |
Re 298: The membership is obviously divided on this question. Is it really
any wonder that the staff is awaiting instruction from the membership?
It seems to me that the real contempt would be pre-empting the membership's
decision.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 309 of 424:
|
Jan 30 01:23 UTC 2004 |
Jamie, being a dick about it may convince some people to vote against your
proposal just to spite you.
|
jp2
|
|
response 310 of 424:
|
Jan 30 01:27 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
jmsaul
|
|
response 311 of 424:
|
Jan 30 01:32 UTC 2004 |
I read it.
|
naftee
|
|
response 312 of 424:
|
Jan 30 01:49 UTC 2004 |
Yeah it's about as polite as you can get.
|
aruba
|
|
response 313 of 424:
|
Jan 30 03:27 UTC 2004 |
I voted "no" on this proposal.
|
mary
|
|
response 314 of 424:
|
Jan 30 09:56 UTC 2004 |
I voted yes.
|
witzbolt
|
|
response 315 of 424:
|
Jan 30 10:16 UTC 2004 |
I voted "no".
|
jp2
|
|
response 316 of 424:
|
Jan 30 13:14 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 317 of 424:
|
Jan 30 13:49 UTC 2004 |
(It's a form of campaigning, jp2.)
|
jp2
|
|
response 318 of 424:
|
Jan 30 13:51 UTC 2004 |
This response has been erased.
|
gelinas
|
|
response 319 of 424:
|
Jan 30 14:01 UTC 2004 |
Glad to be of help. :)
|
davel
|
|
response 320 of 424:
|
Jan 30 14:03 UTC 2004 |
Actually, if you go back and look, it's not in the least uncommon for people
to announce how they are voting or have voted.
|
gull
|
|
response 321 of 424:
|
Jan 30 14:44 UTC 2004 |
I'll sometimes announce how I intend to vote, but I rarely announce how
I *have* voted. And I always reserve the right to change my mind.
|