|
Grex > Coop > #278: Grex Town Hall -- How do we move forward? |  |
|
| Author |
Message |
| 25 new of 357 responses total. |
rcurl
|
|
response 283 of 357:
| 
Jul 1 18:04 UTC 2010 |
They have certainly sopped up a huge amount of user hours.
|
tod
|
|
response 284 of 357:
|
Jul 1 18:11 UTC 2010 |
Whatever happened with this?
#3 Mark A Conger (aruba) Mon, Sep 13, 2004 (12:28)
The executive session the board went into was to discuss a subpoena we
received from a law enforcement agency, relating to a particular user
account. The board read over the subpoena carefully, and agreed to comply
with it. We have now done so.
|
richard
|
|
response 285 of 357:
|
Jul 1 18:40 UTC 2010 |
Was this related to that guy who mostly used mnet and kept constantly
threatening to sue mnet for libel because of discussions about his
rather complicated personal life, accusations that he did this or that
at home, that had taken place on party? Every time he'd get worked up,
he'd say "I'm gonna sue!" If so it might have been his lawyer trying to
get grex party logs where similar discussions might have occurred.
It is rather disturbing that the board chose to meet in 'executive
session', a priviledge not even actually spelled out in the bylaws as
something they could do, and then not discuss the details.
|
tod
|
|
response 286 of 357:
|
Jul 1 18:54 UTC 2010 |
Maybe...I don't recall that guy. What was going on?
|
jep
|
|
response 287 of 357:
|
Jul 1 18:55 UTC 2010 |
Executive or closed sessions are used for personnel issues and discussions
which, for any reason, cannot be made public. Every board has to use them
for some things. If it's rare, I don't see any reason to be concerned
about it.
|
tod
|
|
response 288 of 357:
|
Jul 1 18:59 UTC 2010 |
The board at that time said they would discuss the matter openly after
the legal stuff was over with. I think it's well over with.
|
richard
|
|
response 289 of 357:
|
Jul 1 19:07 UTC 2010 |
re #286 this guy kept threatening to sue mnet, I mean like again and
again, he'd post items on general with what he said were quotes from
legal papers he was always about to file. he and his wife both were
both users as I recall, and he had this narrow view that anything
anybody said in the confs or on party about him, his wife, his kids,
whatever mnet was liable for.
|
richard
|
|
response 290 of 357:
|
Jul 1 20:55 UTC 2010 |
re #284 If the staff conference was ever opened, which has been
requested on numerous occasions, you could go back to that time period
and read the discussions about this issue that are undoubtedly on
there. However 'open' grex is supposed to be though, staff inevitably
drags its feet when it comes to opening the staff conference.
|
kentn
|
|
response 291 of 357:
|
Jul 1 21:56 UTC 2010 |
Re 290: I don't think we're going to open up old staff conferences,
which were responded to under the premise of privacy due to the issues
discussed. If we do open up the staff conference, it'll be with a new
version of the conference, or so was my recollection of the Board's
discussion on the matter.
Re 282: not at all? I doubt that. Note that the (somewhat) in that
response is to indicate I don't believe it's entirely due to this reason
given in the link. There are undoubtedly many reasons why Grex is in
the situation it is today.
|
tod
|
|
response 292 of 357:
|
Jul 1 21:57 UTC 2010 |
re #289
Wow, sounds crazy. I must have not been logging in at that time cuz
I'd remember a weirdo like that.
|
cyklone
|
|
response 293 of 357:
|
Jul 2 00:50 UTC 2010 |
Sounds like Bill Rugg, and I wasn't even on back then; I just remember
the descriptions people posted.
|
richard
|
|
response 294 of 357:
|
Jul 2 02:36 UTC 2010 |
re #293 bingo! you have a good memory. it was guys like bill rugg
that killed mnet, which in its prime was much larger than grex ever
was. there was a time back in the 90's when mnet was huge, had a
potential to be something special. it was guys like bill rugg that
brought it down. he'd only come on grex if mnet was down for a time
but it would have been more than enough for him to fuss if he saw the
same conversations going on here that went on there.
|
tod
|
|
response 295 of 357:
|
Jul 2 03:26 UTC 2010 |
M-Net lost most of its userbase after it crashed from the big hack in 2000.
|
lar
|
|
response 296 of 357:
|
Jul 2 14:33 UTC 2010 |
*cough*
bullshit
|
tod
|
|
response 297 of 357:
|
Jul 3 11:29 UTC 2010 |
vas u there charlie?
|
lar
|
|
response 298 of 357:
|
Jul 3 12:23 UTC 2010 |
yes
|
tod
|
|
response 299 of 357:
|
Jul 3 17:19 UTC 2010 |
Do you remember how many were logged in daily in 99 then how many in 2001?
|
lar
|
|
response 300 of 357:
|
Jul 3 19:01 UTC 2010 |
I remember how many were logged in when I came on in 97. The numbers
had already dropped alot by 99.
|
tod
|
|
response 301 of 357:
|
Jul 3 23:20 UTC 2010 |
I agree
|
lar
|
|
response 302 of 357:
|
Jul 4 00:16 UTC 2010 |
video killed the radio star and HTML killed these kind of systems
|
tod
|
|
response 303 of 357:
|
Jul 5 06:08 UTC 2010 |
AOL killed the INTERNET
|
goose
|
|
response 304 of 357:
|
Jul 7 14:08 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 305 of 357:
|
Jul 7 14:16 UTC 2010 |
This response has been erased.
|
goose
|
|
response 306 of 357:
|
Jul 7 14:18 UTC 2010 |
Man, spend a few years away and you forget how things work.....
But it's interesting to see that you all are discussing the same things you
were discussing 5...no, 7....no, close to 10 years ago. Keep discussing,
maybe things will change. ;-)
|
lar
|
|
response 307 of 357:
|
Jul 7 15:18 UTC 2010 |
LOL
|