You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-356   357-378    
 
Author Message
25 new of 378 responses total.
slynne
response 282 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 15:50 UTC 2006

resp:281 - jep, you are no where near as fat as I am. You are probably 
40lbs overweight. I am more like 140lbs overweight. 

It is true that fat women get judged more harshly than fat men and face 
more fat prejudice. But that is based more on the notion that fat is 
ugly and that women should be judged more on their looks than men. But 
fat men *do* get judged on their weight even if it is to a lesser 
degree. I guess I wasnt sure it would be a good idea to talk about 
sexism *and* fat-hatred in the same item. 
keesan
response 283 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 16:24 UTC 2006

I managed to view Rane's URL with links (needed javascript).
I think it is saying that if you weight 65-75% of average weight you are 5%
more likely to die within a given period.  If you weigh 75-95% of average you
are 93% as likely to die, implying that average people weigh more than is
health for them (in this group of people anyway, in the US).  If you weight
145-155% of average (50% above average, average being somewhat heavier than
is health) you are 211% as likely to die (about twice as many people will die
if they should have weighed 150 lb to be average and they weight 225 lb, or
75 lb overweight).  If you should have weighed 150 lb but weigh 155-165% of
that, call it 160%, and therefore weigh 240 instead (90 lb overweight), you
are more than twice as likely to die as someone average.  This was for men
ages 15-39.  This was if they kept track of people for only 5 years.

If they followed them up for 15-22 years, people who were 10% or so above the
average weight, and had 10% higher chance of dying within 5 years, had 69%
higher chance of dying within 15-22 years, meaning that if the average weight
for you is 150 lbs, a healthier weight (80%) would be 120 lb (that is probably
me at 5'5"), and if I weighed 10% extra (165 lb) I would be 69% more likely
to die than someone who weighed 150 lb, within 15-20 years, and somewhat less
likely if I weighed 120 lb (and were a man currently aged 15-29, of course).

I think this implies that moderate overweight causes a moderate increase in
chance of dying young (which is low to start with so even doubling does not
make much difference), but as you get into your fifties and sixties, the
cumulative effects of being even 10% above average (which is already
overweight) cause people to die with twice the frequency of people who are
not overweight.  This can be from increased frequency of cancer due to poor
diet (colon cancer, breast cancer), from circulatory problems, diabetes. 
Even if you don't die, you are more likely to have joint problems (knee
replacements, bad back), sleep apnea due to fat interfering with air intake.

I agree with slynne that people should not ridicule someone with a health
problem, and that it is sometimes genetic/metabolic, and losing weight is not
easy, but I don't agree that people should give up trying.  Counting calories
is not the best way of dieting, unless it serves to educate people about which
types of food are high in calories and should mostly be avoided.   A friend
losing weight successfully with the most recent Weight Watchers' diet says
there are categories of food she can eat in unlimited amounts, such as whole
grains (despite having carbohydrates they digest slowly and make you feel
full) as long as she does not eat until it hurts.  Most vegetables and fruits
are okay.  Things made of flour, even whole-wheat, are not, they digest too
quickly.  Liquids should be non-caloric (drink water).  A neighbor is losing
weight because his doctor told him to stop drinking alcohol. 

Overweight people as a category probably get less exercise, which can skew
the statistics.  I agree that fat people who exercise are in some ways
healthier than lazy thin people who don't exercise.  

Quitting smoking has to be much more effective in improving health than any
kind of diet.  Good luck keeping it up, lynne.  
richard
response 284 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 16:26 UTC 2006

Here's a link to a body mass index table, at the national heart, lung and 
blood institute:


http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/bmi_tbl.htm

What is your body mass index?
richard
response 285 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 16:28 UTC 2006

note that this site says the BMI numbers categorize as follows:

Underweight Below 18.5 
Normal 18.5 - 24.9  
Overweight 25.0 - 29.9 
Obesity 30.0 and Above 
 


jadecat
response 286 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 16:32 UTC 2006

One of my role-models for weight loss is an lj person. A little over a
year ago she decided that she was tired of being so obese. She didn't
like having to ask for a seat-belt extender for flights, or that getting
up from sitting on the ground was difficult. So she simply did something
about it. She began working out on a nordic track every day. Then once
the weather got warm she added biking to the nordic track workouts. Over
the summer she logged over 1000 miles on her bike. 

With the work outs and only varying her diet slightly- not starving
herself only working with portion control and with more 'healthy' foods-
she managed to lose a substantial amount of weight. She's healthier and
much happier. Her post about how amazing it was to fly and NOT need the
seatbelt extender was wonderful to read.

She's not 'thin' by any means- but she's also not done yet and is still
working out and is still working on improving her diet. Her husband is
also on this journey- running instead of biking. His posts bitching
about how much he dislikes the workout - he doesn't ever get that
'runner's high'- but he likes the effects. So he keeps going.

Both of these two are entertaining writers to read anyway, but their
'get in shape' journey has been quite helpful and inspiring.
tod
response 287 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 17:28 UTC 2006

re #274
I make pancakes each Saturday for the family.  Its 10-grain pancake mix.
slynne
response 288 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:07 UTC 2006

resp:283 Thanks for an explanation of the numbers. There has been some 
more recent research that seems to contradict some of those numbers but 
only for people at lower BMI than me. One study I will mention though 
is one where they corrected for exercise (I dont have the cite handy 
but hvae it in a book at home if anyone wants it). That study showed no 
significant difference in death rates between obese people who 
exercised and thin people who exercised. One possible theory to take 
away from that is that a lack of exercise causes people to be fatter 
than they otherwise would be and a sendentary lifestyle is unhealthy. 
i.e. It isnt "obesity" that causes health problems but rather a lack of 
exercise causes both health problems and obesity (in groups. there 
probably is some about of natural size diversity in the human species. 
Some people will still have high BMI's even if they exercise.)

That is basically the idea behind the "fitness at any size" movement. I 
generally really like that movement because I think a lot of fat people 
have been shamed so much by society that they are afraid to do things 
like join a gym or be seen in a bathing suit. They think that people 
will laugh at them for being fat and out of shape. I also like that 
movement because a lot of people will decide to start to exercise 
because they want to lose weight. But not everyone loses as much weight 
as they would like and a lot of people get discouraged and quit because 
exercise takes a lot of effort. But exercise is a HUGE benefit. 
Probably even more than losing weight. The thing about the people Anne 
mentions in resp:286 is even if that woman and her husband never 
get "thin", they probably have gotten a lot healthier. 
happyboy
response 289 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:40 UTC 2006

hey lynne, you quit smoking?  
slynne
response 290 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:47 UTC 2006

resp:289 Yes. I had quit for a long time but started again last August. 
But I quit again a week ago. I quit smoking *everything* too, not just 
tobacco. 
scholar
response 291 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:48 UTC 2006

what!

everything?!
richard
response 292 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:48 UTC 2006

It helps to have a job where you move around.  If you are sitting in front
of a computer terminal in a stationary position all day at work, and then you
go home and sit in front of a computer all night, you aren't giving yourself
enough motion to burn calories.  The rise in obesity in recent years and the
rise in the internet correlate.  
keesan
response 293 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 18:56 UTC 2006

Lynne, how much exercise did people get in that study and are you getting as
much as they did?  I don't consider myself to get much exercise, and on a
typical day I would walk or bike a few miles just to get places.  Another
grexer lost weight by using a bike for transportation (then got a job driving
a taxi and bought a car on top of that).  

Exercise also strengthens muscles needed to prevent back injuries, but
overweight is still hard on your joints.

I should go climb 8 flights of stairs (the same one 8 times).  I was going
to do one more every day but got bored after three days.  
slynne
response 294 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 19:32 UTC 2006

I dont recall the amount of exercise the people in that particular 
study got. I have, however, read that people who even just walk for 1/2 
hour three times a week are a LOT healthier than people who dont (and 
that most Americans dont even get that much exercise). I get slightly 
more than that and I definately need to increase the amount of exercise 
I get. FWIW, when I was at my MOST active, I was around 50-60 lbs 
thinner than I am right now which is still significantly overweight. At 
that time, I rode by bike around 16 miles a day five days a week to a 
job where I was physically active (waiting tables). I also would tend 
to do things on the weekends like go on backpacking trips that involved 
walking 15 miles a day with a heavy pack. 

I dont think I would want to do quite that much exercise anymore. What 
I will do as the weather gets warmer is start taking the dogs on longer 
walks. Hopefully I will build up to an hour of walking a day which is 
around 2-3 miles for me. I will also go swimming one or two times a 
week for a couple of hours. That is the level of activity I had a few 
years ago and I felt pretty good with it. I dont expect that amount of 
activity will cause me to lose much weight but I do expect it will have 
a positive impact on my health. 

Just out of curiosity, how much exercise do other grexers get? I have a 
feeling that a lot of us are probably beating the 30 minutes 3 times a 
week standard often used in studies on exercise. I remember in my 
health econ class that there was a correlation to the amount of 
exercise a person got and the amount of education they had (which is 
one possible explanation for why college educated people had better 
health than people without college educations) 



slynne
response 295 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 19:35 UTC 2006

I also wanted to mention that their is a correlation between owning a 
dog and being healthy. Dog owners tend to be healthier than non dog 
owners and I wonder how much of that is that dog owners get more 
exercise than non dog owners. I know I get a lot more exercise owning a 
dog because when I dont take them for regular walks, they start to act 
all crazy. It is a strong motivation to get out of the house and get 
moving. 
jadecat
response 296 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 19:44 UTC 2006

My goal is 30 minutes on an Ellipse 3-4 times a week. I'm not quite
there. ;) Hubby and I are doing little things- like parking the car
further from store doors and walking that extra distance. We also live
on the third floor of an apartment building- so I consider doing laundry
(on the first floor) to be exercise. ;)

And yeah, the two people I wrote about may never be 'skinny' but they
will likely get to healthy and decently muscled. 

resp:295 that makes sense. My friend D is quite slender- but she has a
german shepherd that she takes for an hour plus walk and a 20 minute
walk daily.
scholar
response 297 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 19:47 UTC 2006

i have a friend d!
happyboy
response 298 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 20:01 UTC 2006

lynne, my exercise average:

2 hours of chentaiji stuff daily (i don't do it all at once)
5 3-4 mile doggywalks per week (depending on weather)

i'm slowly losing weight after gaining back 10 or 15 lbs once
the rain started this year.  about a lb. a week?  not keeping
a close tracking of weight loss

if the walk doesn't happen i do 2.5-3 hours of taichi that day.

usually.
marcvh
response 299 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 20:05 UTC 2006

I profoundly doubt that anybody could make a successful long-term exercise
program out of an activity they hate.  I guess maybe some people would
have sufficient self-discipline and masochism but I don't think it would
be sustainable.

I think the vital elements of any program is that:
1. You can do it, meaning that it's within your abilities and the time
   it takes is time that you have
2. You want to do it; you enjoy it enough to keep at it consistently and
   set new goals to motivate yourself
3. You can increase its intensity as your fitness increases

I enjoy walking, but it doesn't work well for me because it doesn't fit
criteria 1 and 3.  Walking enough to provide a significant health
benefit takes more time than I usually have available to dedicate to it,
and once I reach a decent level of fitness then the only way to make
walking challenging is to put on a 40-pound backpack and walk up a
mountain.  That can be fun but I can't do it every day before (or after)
work.
richard
response 300 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 20:05 UTC 2006

re #295, #296  slynne may have a point.  maybe its time for anne and beau to
adopt a dog.  One dog equals much less time needed to be spent on ellipse.
besides somebody needs to move in to keep those cats in place  :)
tod
response 301 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 20:45 UTC 2006

re #277
 resp:266 Ok, what are the risks? Like in a group of a 100 people who are
 morbidly obese, how many of them will be dead by the time they are say
 70 compared to a similar group of people of what you consider to be a
 healthy weight. This seems to be a difficult statistic to find but it
 seems kind of essential to me. I appreciate your good intentions though.

PREMATURE DEATH
An estimated 300,000 deaths per year may be attributable to obesity. 
The risk of death rises with increasing weight. 
Even moderate weight excess (10 to 20 pounds for a person of average height)
increases the risk of death, particularly among adults aged 30 to 64 years.

Individuals who are obese (BMI > 30)* have a 50 to 100% increased risk of
premature death from all causes, compared to individuals with a healthy
weight. 

HEART DISEASE
The incidence of heart disease (heart attack, congestive heart failure, sudden
cardiac death, angina or chest pain, and abnormal heart rhythm) is increased
in persons who are overweight or obese (BMI > 25).* 
High blood pressure is twice as common in adults who are obese than in those
who are at a healthy weight. 
Obesity is associated with elevated triglycerides (blood fat) and decreased
HDL cholesterol ("good cholesterol"). 

DIABETES
A weight gain of 11 to 18 pounds increases a person's risk of developing type
2 diabetes to twice that of individuals who have not gained weight. 
Over 80% of people with diabetes are overweight or obese. 

CANCER
Overweight and obesity are associated with an increased risk for some types
of cancer including endometrial (cancer of the lining of the uterus), colon,
gall bladder, prostate, kidney, and postmenopausal breast cancer. 
Women gaining more than 20 pounds from age 18 to midlife double their risk
of postmenopausal breast cancer, compared to women whose weight remains
stable. 

BREATHING PROBLEMS
Sleep apnea (interrupted breathing while sleeping) is more common in obese
persons. 
Obesity is associated with a higher prevalence of asthma. 

ARTHRITIS
For every 2-pound increase in weight, the risk of developing arthritis is
increased by 9 to 13%. 
Symptoms of arthritis can improve with weight loss. 

REPRODUCTIVE COMPLICATIONS
Complications of pregnancy 
Obesity during pregnancy is associated with increased risk of death in both
the baby and the mother and increases the risk of maternal high blood pressure
by 10 times. 
In addition to many other complications, women who are obese during pregnancy
are more likely to have gestational diabetes and problems with labor and
delivery. 
Infants born to women who are obese during pregnancy are more likely to be
high birthweight and, therefore, may face a higher rate of Cesarean section
delivery and low blood sugar (which can be associated with brain damage and
seizures). 
Obesity during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of birth
defects, particularly neural tube defects, such as spina bifida. 
Obesity in premenopausal women is associated with irregular menstrual cycles
and infertility. 

ADDITIONAL HEALTH CONSEQUENCES
Overweight and obesity are associated with increased risks of gall bladder
disease, incontinence, increased surgical risk, and depression. 
Obesity can affect the quality of life through limited mobility and decreased
physical endurance as well as through social, academic, and job
discrimination. 

CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
Risk factors for heart disease, such as high cholesterol and high blood
pressure, occur with increased frequency in overweight children and
adolescents compared to those with a healthy weight. 
Type 2 diabetes, previously considered an adult disease, has increased
dramatically in children and adolescents. Overweight and obesity are closely
linked to type 2 diabetes. 
Overweight adolescents have a 70% chance of becoming overweight or obese
adults. This increases to 80% if one or more parent is overweight or obese.

The most immediate consequence of overweight, as perceived by children
themselves, is social discrimination. 

BENEFITS OF WEIGHT LOSS
Weight loss, as modest as 5 to 15% of total body weight in a person who is
overweight or obese, reduces the risk factors for some diseases, particularly
heart disease. 
Weight loss can result in lower blood pressure, lower blood sugar, and
improved cholesterol levels. 
A person with a Body Mass Index (BMI) above the healthy weight range* may
benefit from weight loss, especially if he or she has other health risk
factors, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, smoking, diabetes,
a sedentary lifestyle, and a personal and/or family history of heart disease.

http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/topics/obesity/calltoaction/fact_consequences
.htm
jadecat
response 302 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 21:29 UTC 2006

resp:300 Our apartment lease limits us to two pets. We have two. Though
we actually do want to adopt a dog at some point.

And keep the cats in line... heh. That's funny. 
slynne
response 303 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 21:33 UTC 2006

That is my point. The statistics are seldom presented in a meaningful 
way. For example:

"Individuals who are obese (BMI > 30)* have a 50 to 100% increased risk 
of premature death from all causes, compared to individuals with a 
healthy weight." <---- this is a meaningless statistic unless one knows 
what the risk of premature death from all causes is. I mean, if 10 
people out of a 1000 die prematurely and the obesity risk doubles that 
so 20 out of 1000 die prematurely...well that is a very different thing 
than if the original risk of dying prematurely is 495/1000. See what I 
mean? 

Here is what I think. I think it is possible that even with a doubled 
or even tripled risk of premature death, fat people are MORE likely not 
to die prematurely than they are to die prematurely. They just are more 
likely to die prematurely than someone who isnt obese. 

 

slynne
response 304 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 21:40 UTC 2006

Heh. I have a dog who thinks it is her life's mission to keep cats in 
line. She is part Border Collie and "herds" my cat 
glenda
response 305 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 00:50 UTC 2006

If I loose weight and my blood pressure and blood sugar levels drop along with
it, I am in serious trouble.  I have low blood sugar and low blood pressure.
When I was in the hospital for my surgeries in late 2003 and mid 2004 I had
real problems with the nurses and blood pressure.  Since I am overweight they
would always pump the machine up into the 200 range.  My normal pressure runs
in the neighborhood of 105/60. 

Right after STeve's stroke in 2001, our Dr felt that we both fit the profile
of becoming diabetic and put us on a preventative medication without checking
my blood sugar levels.  I didn't think much about it since it is in my
records.  Within a couple of days I was shaky, nauseated, couldn't
concentrate, etc.  I realized what was going on and quit taking them, sent
email to him telling him so and why.  He agreed.

Just because you are overweight doesn't mean that you get the all or any of
the problems associated with it.  Unfortunately, even the medical profession
tends to have the preconceived negatives of being overweight.  The only real
problem I have that can be contributed to my being overweight is the arthritis
in my knees, and only a portion of it.  They were going bad even before I put
on the weight, may actually be part of the reason why I put it on in the first
place.  My knees have been a problem since my early teens, I was very active
in my youth and damaged them often.  The pain in the knees slowed me down as
exercise hurt.  Walking started to hurt before I was 25, I gave up biking
because of it.  I continued to walk until about the time of the June 2004
surgery.  By that point they hurt all the time, moving or not.  Exercise
becomes the last thing you want to do when every step, every movement is
agony.  Even turning over in bed can cause me to wake up crying with the pain.
It then becomes an evil cycle -- no exercise - weight gain, weight gain - more
pain - less exercise.  I seem to have curtailed the gain, now to work on the
loss.  I did do physical therapy in a heated pool a couple of times a week.
It helped with the stiffness and some weight loss, but not the pain. 
Unfortunately, with the semester change my free hours no longer matched the
pool's open hours.  A normal pool doesn't work, cold water causes the muscles
to tighten rather than relax.  The therapy pool is kept at 90 degress, most
people won't tolerate that kind of temps in a pool.
keesan
response 306 of 378: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 01:01 UTC 2006

They measured my blood pressure with an automatic machine that automatically
goes up to 160, not 200, but my pressure is low like yours and the machine
was giving wrong readings so I convinced them to do it manually (and start
at 120 and measure me at 105 or 99).  

What hurts besides your knees?  Maybe there is some upper body exercise that
you could do at home, such as situps or pushups.
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   257-281   282-306   307-331   332-356   357-378    
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss