You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   256-280   281-305   306-318      
 
Author Message
25 new of 318 responses total.
jep
response 281 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 13:15 UTC 2006

I watch shipping costs very closely when I bid on anything on eBay, as 
well.
keesan
response 282 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 2 15:24 UTC 2006

I bought a camera transfer cable for $0.99 and paid $3 shipping and was happy.
You did not mention the amounts involved, or the weight of the item.
twenex
response 283 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 5 12:08 UTC 2006

IA really BB my computer shut down again?! More details in the micros conf.
richard
response 284 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:22 UTC 2006

IBB they killed off Edgar on '24' last night.  He was one of the best 
characters and will be missed.  I was actually hoping if someone had to 
die on last night's episode, they would have rubbed out Kim Bauer, 
Jack's bratty daughter.  Poor Kiefer saves her life again and again, 
every season, and what does he get for it? No appreciation, I tell ya!  

The body count is rising and the twenty four hour day's not half over 
yet.  At this rate they'll have to get Kiefer an entire new supporting 
cast next season  :)  
tod
response 285 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:28 UTC 2006

I've heard rumors that Chloe is going to avenge Edgar and become a super hero
like Bauer.
marcvh
response 286 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:34 UTC 2006

Well, she did shoot those two guys last season, and she was adequate (if
not heroic) this morning when being pursued.

Kim will probably end up working next to Chloe in the next couple of
hours.  She's a "fully trained CTU analyst" (from day 3, remember?)
and CTU has a bit of a staff shortage all of a sudden.
tod
response 287 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:35 UTC 2006

Will Kim's boyfriend turn out to work for SPECTRE?
rcurl
response 288 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:41 UTC 2006

The bummer for me with 24 is the frequent ad breaks. It makes it all not
worthwhile.
richard
response 289 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:45 UTC 2006

One character I hope they don't kill off this season is Sean Astin's.  
He's been a terrific addition, and we don't yet know just how 
villainous he will turn out to be.  
marcvh
response 290 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:45 UTC 2006

24 is hard to watch without a DVR, not mainly because of the ad breaks
but because of the serial format which makes it difficult to feel caught
up after missing an episode.  But that's also what makes it good.
richard
response 291 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 00:52 UTC 2006

Of course the real suspense on '24' is always will Jack Bauer make it 
through twenty four hours without eating, drinking or taking a crap, 
and still have enough strength left by the end of the last hour to save 
the world.  

I mean the poor guy NEVER has time to eat!   :)
remmers
response 292 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 13:11 UTC 2006

Best way to watch "24" is on DVD.  No ads.  Of course, it means you're
at least a season behind...
richard
response 293 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 15:39 UTC 2006

There have been hints this season of Jack Bauer having vigilante tendencies.
He killed a guy in the season opener that he didnt even need to kill.  Maybe
his daughter dies at the end of the season and he cracks up and turns
vigilante.  Next season then he's the bad guy and Chloe and Tony Almeida are
ordered to go capture him or kill him before he tells the bad guys all his
secrets.

rcurl
response 294 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 16:44 UTC 2006

Now you've  done it - given it all away. But think of all the time I'll save
not watching. 
marcvh
response 295 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 17:26 UTC 2006

Jack's tendency to break the rules in this way is nothing new.

I don't think people would watch the show without Jack, or without him
being the good-guy protagonist.
scholar
response 296 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 18:43 UTC 2006

re. 292:  not if you have connections!
tod
response 297 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 8 21:59 UTC 2006

re #291
He's doing all those things during commercials.
jep
response 298 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 10 21:42 UTC 2006

Earlier I was happy because I got my computer at work up and running 
again.

Now I'm unhappy, because it died again.  A product which I will soon be 
supporting, has killed my computer twice now when I installed it.
keesan
response 299 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 00:51 UTC 2006

It damaged the hardware?  Could it be a bad controller, not a bad drive?  We
can check out the drive for you.  In 2000 someone gave us a 20GB that turned
out to be perfect (except for having Win98FE on it).
jep
response 300 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 11 04:26 UTC 2006

Nah, Sterling Commerce will take care of the problem.  It's a software
problem; some program is conflicting with the one I was trying to install.
jiffer
response 301 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 17 13:19 UTC 2006

IBB I am still waiting for the results of the exit exam. I hate the wait....
I really really hate it. 
slynne
response 302 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 00:35 UTC 2006

 IBB I had a bad day at work. About a year ago, some major changes were
made in my department at work. Changes that I predicted would not work
well. As it happens, I was both right and wrong in my predictions. Our
metrics have gotten worse as I predicted but they are not nearly as bad
as I thought they would be. Apparently they are bad enough though. At a
staff meeting today, we were essentially told to stop being so lazy and
to improve our metrics. Oh well. Eventually, they will have to see that
the problem isnt that the staff is being lazy, it is that they made some
bad decisions. 

 I dont think I am going to change much about how hard I work as a
result of that meeting and I know that my co-workers feel the same way.
I mean, I work pretty hard now. I work harder than I was working a year
ago but I am getting worse numbers. One thing that seems clear though is
that as a team, we will probably not get big raises this year because we
havent even come close to meeting our goals. I dont like that but I know
how the system works and I know that when the non-supervisory staff dont
meet goals and when it is a situation where *no one* has met their
goals, the management dont get raises either. 

Of course, all of this sucks in a way because it could mean our entire
department gets outsourced. I tend to think that isnt going to happen
though because one of the results of their new system is that the new
hires are failing worse than anyone which might mean that if they fire
us all and hire an outside company to do the job, things will be even
worse for the company. We'll see. If we do get layed off, at least for
me, the timing is good. I am only about 12 credits away from *finally*
getting a degree which would theoretically help me in any future job
searches. 

Oh, and it has come to my attention that other people's response to the
metrics has been to start cheating. There is part of me that is kind of
mad about that but part of me wonders if it might be such a bad idea. I
mean, it seems like numbers are all they care about. If I can see the
cheating on the numbers my co-workers do, surely the management sees it
too? 

I am totally reminded of a Dilbert cartoon I have on my wall at work.
Dogbert answers the phone and says "Dogbert's Tech Support" 

 The caller says "I..." 

Dogbert interupts him and says "Shut up and reboot!" 

The caller says "Hey, it wor..." 

Dogbert interupts him again and says, "Shut up and hang up!" 

The final frame has Dogbert thinking, "My average call times are sure
improving"

I guess that is just how it goes when one works for a large company. 

tod
response 303 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 00:44 UTC 2006

Quality vs. quantity
keesan
response 304 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 01:06 UTC 2006

What are 'metrics'?
tod
response 305 of 318: Mark Unseen   Mar 18 01:15 UTC 2006

1
10
100
1000
10000
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   256-280   281-305   306-318      
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss