You are not logged in. Login Now
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   255-279   280-304   305-329   330-354   355-379   380-404   405-429 
 430-454   455-479   480-504   505-529   530-554   555-579   580-604   605-610   
 
Author Message
25 new of 610 responses total.
i
response 280 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 12 01:03 UTC 1998

<chortle>
It's not milk.
lilmo
response 281 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 13 23:43 UTC 1998

Well, I said that I didn't think so, but I figured that I didn't lose
anything by guessing.

Is it human-food?
remmers
response 282 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 14 00:25 UTC 1998

The ratio of protein to fat, and the total absence of carbohydrate,
suggests some kind of meat, or maybe egg, product, one that's not
excessively high in fat. But Valerie's right, meat isn't usually
measured in cups or fractions thereof. So I dunno...
i
response 283 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 14 03:47 UTC 1998

Yes, this food is commonly sold for human consumption.  :)
lilmo
response 284 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 15 23:45 UTC 1998

Is is egg white?
keesan
response 285 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 00:39 UTC 1998

egg replacer?
i
response 286 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 02:32 UTC 1998

This is neither egg white nor egg replacer.
valerie
response 287 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 14:18 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

i
response 288 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 16 22:48 UTC 1998

Total Fat 5g    8%
Saturated Fat 1g        6%
Cholesterol 40mg        13%
 - is how it's laid out on the actual label.  (Anyone else find my
squeeze-it-in style too cryptic?)

Nope, not cocoa mix.  1 T of plain cocoa contains 3g carbohydrates - 2 of
'em fiber.  None o' neither in this stuff.

Keep guessing!  <chortle>
i
response 289 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 20 18:03 UTC 1998

It seems hard to believe that i've actually stumped a bunch of 
red-blooded American cooks with this traditional, mainstream
food......
remmers
response 290 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 21 10:52 UTC 1998

(All the gurus here know what it is, but you've forbidden them from
responding.  ;-)

Actually, I'm stumped at this point...
i
response 291 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 21 23:12 UTC 1998

Verbose hint:
   It appears that the collective council of greater gurus have, in their
assembled wisdom, made many assumptions and ruled out many things without
resorting to the chela's crutch of asking whether their seeming enlighten-
ment is the real McCoy......true, enlightened, and forbearing Buddhas
excepted, of course....
keesan
response 292 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 15:14 UTC 1998

We don't eat traditional mainstream food, or animal products.  Hamburger?
lilmo
response 293 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 22:31 UTC 1998

Is it canned mea of some kind?
lilmo
response 294 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 22:32 UTC 1998

er, meat, that is.
i
response 295 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 22 22:44 UTC 1998

Looks like lilmo's found the right track.  Not hamburger, through.
lilmo
response 296 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 01:37 UTC 1998

Vienna Sausage?  Potted Meat?
i
response 297 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 02:04 UTC 1998

Not Vienna Sausage (loved it as a kid, now i think it's gross).
What's Potted Meat?
omni
response 298 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 05:50 UTC 1998

  It has to be SPAM! SPAM, SPAM, GLORIOUS SPAM!!!
omni
response 299 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 23 05:52 UTC 1998

 Potted Meat is evil. It is made from pig parts that are uh well, better left
unmentioned.
i
response 300 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 24 00:32 UTC 1998

Okay, this is definitely NOT potted meat.
It also is not SPAM (or any of the varieties or knock-offs of SPAM) - way
too little fat & sodium!
valerie
response 301 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 01:47 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

valerie
response 302 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 01:48 UTC 1998

This response has been erased.

scott
response 303 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 20:27 UTC 1998

OK, I hate finding and typing in my own label, but I still want to guess.

Cheese dip?
i
response 304 of 610: Mark Unseen   Sep 28 20:59 UTC 1998

Maybe people need to re-read responses #293 & following...

I second valerie's rejection of Campbell's soup on the ground of 
insufficient sodium.

Nothing wrong with handing off the trophy if you win, scott.  But it's
not cheese anything.

s/nd o/nds o/

<chortle>

(Unlike the previously-known "it's a can", there was a far more subtle 
clue burried in the my plug for this cf. in agora....)
 0-24   25-49   50-74   75-99   100-124   125-149   150-174   175-199   200-224 
 225-249   250-274   255-279   280-304   305-329   330-354   355-379   380-404   405-429 
 430-454   455-479   480-504   505-529   530-554   555-579   580-604   605-610   
Response Not Possible: You are Not Logged In
 

- Backtalk version 1.3.30 - Copyright 1996-2006, Jan Wolter and Steve Weiss